{ "title": "Anse Cochon inquiry: two-sitting evidence register", "date": "2026-10-14", "source_dates": [ "2026-10-13", "2026-10-14" ], "updated": "2026-10-15", "scope": "All six supplied transcript parts from the public sittings of 13 and 14 October 2026. Editorial paraphrases and exact automated-source excerpts; not a certified transcript or final Commission findings.", "methodology": "Each new claim is an editorial paraphrase, with exact source paragraph text and references to qualifications. Raw excerpts retain automated spelling. No fault findings are inferred. Day 1 core fields are preserved byte-for-byte as JSON values.", "claims": [ { "id": "P1-001", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Collision occurred on night of Saturday 18 July 2026 at Anse Cochon; four deaths, three passengers and one crew; one boat destroyed and the other sank.", "status": "official opening account", "source": "I 00:02:41–00:03:29", "source_anchor": "P1-000241", "caveat": "Opening does not assign destruction/sinking to named boats; not a final finding.", "original": { "id": "P1-001", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:02:41", "end": "00:03:29", "speaker": "Chair", "claim": "Collision occurred on night of Saturday 18 July 2026 at Anse Cochon; four deaths, three passengers and one crew; one boat destroyed and the other sank.", "evidence_status": "official_opening_account", "editorial_note": "Opening does not assign destruction/sinking to named boats; not a final finding.", "entities": [ "Ocean Angel", "Kazoula JR" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-002", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Commission appointed 1 September; oaths taken 8 September; three prior in-camera meetings.", "status": "procedural record", "source": "I 00:03:29–00:04:59", "source_anchor": "P1-000329", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-002", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:03:29", "end": "00:04:59", "speaker": "Chair", "claim": "Commission appointed 1 September; oaths taken 8 September; three prior in-camera meetings.", "evidence_status": "procedural_record", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-003", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Four commissioners include chair Justice Mario Michel, ACP Luke [De Freitas ASR], retired marine superintendent Mr Frederick, maritime consultant [name garbled]; secretary Lenita Joseph and counsel [name garbled].", "status": "procedural record", "source": "I 00:04:16–00:04:59", "source_anchor": "P1-000416", "caveat": "Names must be independently verified; original source says Michelle/Defrightus/Kbad Di/Shahed Shallmine Octav.", "original": { "id": "P1-003", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:04:16", "end": "00:04:59", "speaker": "Chair", "claim": "Four commissioners include chair Justice Mario Michel, ACP Luke [De Freitas ASR], retired marine superintendent Mr Frederick, maritime consultant [name garbled]; secretary Lenita Joseph and counsel [name garbled].", "evidence_status": "procedural_record", "editorial_note": "Names must be independently verified; original source says Michelle/Defrightus/Kbad Di/Shahed Shallmine Octav.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-004", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Mandate includes incident circumstances, maritime legislation reform, SOP/protocol review and recommendations.", "status": "procedural record", "source": "I 00:05:43–00:07:55", "source_anchor": "P1-000543", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-004", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:05:43", "end": "00:07:55", "speaker": "Chair", "claim": "Mandate includes incident circumstances, maritime legislation reform, SOP/protocol review and recommendations.", "evidence_status": "procedural_record", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-005", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Two registered vessels named as Ocean Angel and Kazola JR with registration numbers read aloud.", "status": "document description", "source": "I 00:05:43–00:06:30", "source_anchor": "P1-000543", "caveat": "Do not publish ASR registration numbers without original commission/certificates.", "original": { "id": "P1-005", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:05:43", "end": "00:06:30", "speaker": "Chair", "claim": "Two registered vessels named as Ocean Angel and Kazola JR with registration numbers read aloud.", "evidence_status": "document_description", "editorial_note": "Do not publish ASR registration numbers without original commission/certificates.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-006", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Four deceased described as two young men and two young women.", "status": "official opening account", "source": "I 00:09:20–00:10:08", "source_anchor": "P1-000920", "caveat": "No victim names supplied here.", "original": { "id": "P1-006", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:09:20", "end": "00:10:08", "speaker": "Chair", "claim": "Four deceased described as two young men and two young women.", "evidence_status": "official_opening_account", "editorial_note": "No victim names supplied here.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-007", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Separate criminal charges concern alleged trespass on anchored yacht and grievous harm to its owner.", "status": "official opening account", "source": "I 00:10:08–00:10:50", "source_anchor": "P1-001008", "caveat": "Accused unnamed here; allegations not findings.", "original": { "id": "P1-007", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:10:08", "end": "00:10:50", "speaker": "Chair", "claim": "Separate criminal charges concern alleged trespass on anchored yacht and grievous harm to its owner.", "evidence_status": "official_opening_account", "editorial_note": "Accused unnamed here; allegations not findings.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-008", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal 153 Luciano [Guard/God]", "statement": "Officer from Marine Intelligence and Investigations Unit affirmed as investigator.", "status": "sworn identity", "source": "I 00:17:00–00:20:17", "source_anchor": "P1-001700", "caveat": "Surname uncertain in ASR.", "original": { "id": "P1-008", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:17:00", "end": "00:20:17", "speaker": "Corporal 153 Luciano [Guard/God]", "claim": "Officer from Marine Intelligence and Investigations Unit affirmed as investigator.", "evidence_status": "sworn_identity", "editorial_note": "Surname uncertain in ASR.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-009", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal and Chair", "statement": "Pages 2 and 4 of Pascal statement missing from police copy; officer attributes to copying and confusion over numbering.", "status": "document gap", "source": "I 00:25:10–00:27:42", "source_anchor": "P1-002510", "caveat": "Not evidence of deliberate suppression.", "original": { "id": "P1-009", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:25:10", "end": "00:27:42", "speaker": "Corporal and Chair", "claim": "Pages 2 and 4 of Pascal statement missing from police copy; officer attributes to copying and confusion over numbering.", "evidence_status": "document_gap", "editorial_note": "Not evidence of deliberate suppression.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-010", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair and Corporal", "statement": "Complete four-page Pascal statement located in SLASPA director report and authenticated by investigator.", "status": "document resolution", "source": "I 00:45:21–00:47:17", "source_anchor": "P1-004521", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-010", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:45:21", "end": "00:47:17", "speaker": "Chair and Corporal", "claim": "Complete four-page Pascal statement located in SLASPA director report and authenticated by investigator.", "evidence_status": "document_resolution", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-011", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal", "statement": "Corporal 256 Stannis and Acting Corporal 407 Johnson statements outstanding; other previously missing police statements received.", "status": "sworn investigation status", "source": "I 00:41:43–00:43:56", "source_anchor": "P1-004143", "caveat": "Names and ranks ASR-sensitive.", "original": { "id": "P1-011", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:41:43", "end": "00:43:56", "speaker": "Corporal", "claim": "Corporal 256 Stannis and Acting Corporal 407 Johnson statements outstanding; other previously missing police statements received.", "evidence_status": "sworn_investigation_status", "editorial_note": "Names and ranks ASR-sensitive.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-012", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal", "statement": "Initial Elias Nicholas statement attempt prevented by injuries; no subsequent attempt by hearing morning.", "status": "admission", "source": "I 00:45:21–00:46:16", "source_anchor": "P1-004521", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-012", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:45:21", "end": "00:46:16", "speaker": "Corporal", "claim": "Initial Elias Nicholas statement attempt prevented by injuries; no subsequent attempt by hearing morning.", "evidence_status": "admission", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-013", "part": "I", "speaker": "Commissioner Frederick", "statement": "Requests marine-unit movement diary and government vessel logs; thinks three response vessels used on separate occasions.", "status": "document request", "source": "I 00:47:17–00:49:13", "source_anchor": "P1-004717", "caveat": "Three-vessel count is a commissioner suggestion, not validated fleet manifest.", "original": { "id": "P1-013", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:47:17", "end": "00:49:13", "speaker": "Commissioner Frederick", "claim": "Requests marine-unit movement diary and government vessel logs; thinks three response vessels used on separate occasions.", "evidence_status": "document_request", "editorial_note": "Three-vessel count is a commissioner suggestion, not validated fleet manifest.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-014", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal", "statement": "Police file expected to be completed in two weeks; logs obtainable in a few days.", "status": "sworn investigation status", "source": "I 00:50:35–00:51:43", "source_anchor": "P1-005035", "caveat": "Future estimate, not completion.", "original": { "id": "P1-014", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:50:35", "end": "00:51:43", "speaker": "Corporal", "claim": "Police file expected to be completed in two weeks; logs obtainable in a few days.", "evidence_status": "sworn_investigation_status", "editorial_note": "Future estimate, not completion.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-015", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal", "statement": "Statements from Kazula JR passengers Taylor Rivier and Rome William recorded 29 July; signed copies reportedly ready but uncollected.", "status": "sworn investigation status", "source": "I 00:51:43–00:52:34", "source_anchor": "P1-005143", "caveat": "Names ASR-sensitive; separates recorded interview from signed statement delivery.", "original": { "id": "P1-015", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:51:43", "end": "00:52:34", "speaker": "Corporal", "claim": "Statements from Kazula JR passengers Taylor Rivier and Rome William recorded 29 July; signed copies reportedly ready but uncollected.", "evidence_status": "sworn_investigation_status", "editorial_note": "Names ASR-sensitive; separates recorded interview from signed statement delivery.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-016", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal and Chair", "statement": "Scenes-of-crime report expected within two-week period; investigator will return for substantive evidence.", "status": "sworn investigation status", "source": "I 00:53:58–00:57:13", "source_anchor": "P1-005358", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-016", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:53:58", "end": "00:57:13", "speaker": "Corporal and Chair", "claim": "Scenes-of-crime report expected within two-week period; investigator will return for substantive evidence.", "evidence_status": "sworn_investigation_status", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-017", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal", "statement": "Officer saw SLASPA preliminary report, not final report; says agencies normally conduct maritime investigation jointly.", "status": "sworn investigation status", "source": "I 00:57:13–00:58:41", "source_anchor": "P1-005713", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-017", "source_part": 1, "start": "00:57:13", "end": "00:58:41", "speaker": "Corporal", "claim": "Officer saw SLASPA preliminary report, not final report; says agencies normally conduct maritime investigation jointly.", "evidence_status": "sworn_investigation_status", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-018", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal", "statement": "SLASPA surveyors Peter Joseph and Wilbur [Etienne/ATN] visited scene with investigator; requested statements outstanding.", "status": "sworn investigation status", "source": "I 01:00:24–01:02:54", "source_anchor": "P1-010024", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-018", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:00:24", "end": "01:02:54", "speaker": "Corporal", "claim": "SLASPA surveyors Peter Joseph and Wilbur [Etienne/ATN] visited scene with investigator; requested statements outstanding.", "evidence_status": "sworn_investigation_status", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-019", "part": "I", "speaker": "Corporal", "statement": "Fisheries not approached because boats registered under Maritime Affairs; MRCC contact outside his purview.", "status": "sworn investigation status", "source": "I 01:01:02–01:01:48", "source_anchor": "P1-010102", "caveat": "Does not prove no MRCC contact by any agency.", "original": { "id": "P1-019", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:01:02", "end": "01:01:48", "speaker": "Corporal", "claim": "Fisheries not approached because boats registered under Maritime Affairs; MRCC contact outside his purview.", "evidence_status": "sworn_investigation_status", "editorial_note": "Does not prove no MRCC contact by any agency.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-020", "part": "I", "speaker": "Secretary Lenita Joseph", "statement": "Police Marine/RSS/MRCC SOPs, 18–23 July movement diary, ship logs and boarding forms requested from police Commissioner office were due 7 October and not received.", "status": "procedural record", "source": "I 01:02:54–01:04:40", "source_anchor": "P1-010254", "caveat": "Investigator says he had resupplied own diary.", "original": { "id": "P1-020", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:02:54", "end": "01:04:40", "speaker": "Secretary Lenita Joseph", "claim": "Police Marine/RSS/MRCC SOPs, 18–23 July movement diary, ship logs and boarding forms requested from police Commissioner office were due 7 October and not received.", "evidence_status": "procedural_record", "editorial_note": "Investigator says he had resupplied own diary.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-021", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Adopts 24 July police statement without correction.", "status": "sworn adoption", "source": "I 01:15:13–01:15:46", "source_anchor": "P1-011513", "caveat": "Full written statement not reproduced in transcript.", "original": { "id": "P1-021", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:15:13", "end": "01:15:46", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Adopts 24 July police statement without correction.", "evidence_status": "sworn_adoption", "editorial_note": "Full written statement not reproduced in transcript.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-022", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Tyrone initially drove moderately; Dylan said Tyrone could not push the boat and took over, driving fast.", "status": "eyewitness account disputed", "source": "I 01:21:35–01:22:56", "source_anchor": "P1-012135", "caveat": "Nicholas disputes speed increase and quotation; no instrumental speed.", "original": { "id": "P1-022", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:21:35", "end": "01:22:56", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Tyrone initially drove moderately; Dylan said Tyrone could not push the boat and took over, driving fast.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account_disputed", "editorial_note": "Nicholas disputes speed increase and quotation; no instrumental speed.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-023", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Sat second bench forward of stern captain; two beside her, three behind, two ahead.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:23:35–01:24:41", "source_anchor": "P1-012335", "caveat": "Seat arithmetic yields eight on benches plus captain; identities not supplied.", "original": { "id": "P1-023", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:23:35", "end": "01:24:41", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Sat second bench forward of stern captain; two beside her, three behind, two ahead.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "Seat arithmetic yields eight on benches plus captain; identities not supplied.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-024", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Requested life jacket because unable to swim; captain reassured she was safe with him; no pre-impact life jacket.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:16:47–01:20:00", "source_anchor": "P1-011647", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-024", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:16:47", "end": "01:20:00", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Requested life jacket because unable to swim; captain reassured she was safe with him; no pre-impact life jacket.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-025", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Saw nobody wearing life jacket; could not recall whether stored life jackets were aboard.", "status": "eyewitness account corresponds with admission", "source": "I 01:29:00–01:31:20", "source_anchor": "P1-012900", "caveat": "Keep non-wearing distinct from absence of equipment.", "original": { "id": "P1-025", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:29:00", "end": "01:31:20", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Saw nobody wearing life jacket; could not recall whether stored life jackets were aboard.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account_corresponds_with_admission", "editorial_note": "Keep non-wearing distinct from absence of equipment.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-026", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "No safety briefing; precise departure time not recalled.", "status": "eyewitness account corresponds with admission", "source": "I 01:25:23–01:26:17", "source_anchor": "P1-012523", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-026", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:25:23", "end": "01:26:17", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "No safety briefing; precise departure time not recalled.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account_corresponds_with_admission", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-027", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Boat was white and red; she saw no navigation lights as it approached dock.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:31:20–01:32:09", "source_anchor": "P1-013120", "caveat": "Dylan later admits lights off at departure.", "original": { "id": "P1-027", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:31:20", "end": "01:32:09", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Boat was white and red; she saw no navigation lights as it approached dock.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "Dylan later admits lights off at departure.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-028", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Maintains she saw no navigation lights during voyage up to before collision.", "status": "eyewitness account disputed", "source": "I 01:38:51–01:40:58", "source_anchor": "P1-013851", "caveat": "Location/field of view and light operation unresolved.", "original": { "id": "P1-028", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:38:51", "end": "01:40:58", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Maintains she saw no navigation lights during voyage up to before collision.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account_disputed", "editorial_note": "Location/field of view and light operation unresolved.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-029", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Prior rain, cloudy/dark, sea not calm; bow rose and blocked view; felt bouncing.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:32:38–01:35:24", "source_anchor": "P1-013238", "caveat": "Weather bulletin and measured sea state not in source.", "original": { "id": "P1-029", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:32:38", "end": "01:35:24", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Prior rain, cloudy/dark, sea not calm; bow rose and blocked view; felt bouncing.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "Weather bulletin and measured sea state not in source.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-030", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Last pre-water memory is life-jacket conversation; cannot describe impact; remembers straight course, not zigzagging.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:34:48–01:35:59", "source_anchor": "P1-013448", "caveat": "Do not fabricate impact from memory gap.", "original": { "id": "P1-030", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:34:48", "end": "01:35:59", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Last pre-water memory is life-jacket conversation; cannot describe impact; remembers straight course, not zigzagging.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "Do not fabricate impact from memory gap.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-031", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Southbound boat passed without stopping; prompted separation estimate 15–20 m; later rescue felt hours but others said minutes.", "status": "eyewitness account and hearsay", "source": "I 01:36:35–01:38:03", "source_anchor": "P1-013635", "caveat": "No proof passing crew perceived distress; no reliable elapsed rescue time.", "original": { "id": "P1-031", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:36:35", "end": "01:38:03", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Southbound boat passed without stopping; prompted separation estimate 15–20 m; later rescue felt hours but others said minutes.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account_and_hearsay", "editorial_note": "No proof passing crew perceived distress; no reliable elapsed rescue time.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-032", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Later craft responded to survivor phone light; rescuer recognised as friend from Baron Drive.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:27:21–01:28:06", "source_anchor": "P1-012721", "caveat": "Name and destination incomplete in Part I.", "original": { "id": "P1-032", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:27:21", "end": "01:28:06", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Later craft responded to survivor phone light; rescuer recognised as friend from Baron Drive.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "Name and destination incomplete in Part I.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 adds a Canaries rescue route described by Taylor and Romeon, and a distinct yacht–Ti Kaye route from other Cazorla survivors. Identities and loads must be matched before treating differences as contradictions.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0033", "D2P1-P0130", "D2P3-S037" ] } }, { "id": "P1-033", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Someone handed her life jacket in water; cannot identify who.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:19:35–01:20:00", "source_anchor": "P1-011935", "caveat": "Does not contradict Nicholas claiming to be provider.", "original": { "id": "P1-033", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:19:35", "end": "01:20:00", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Someone handed her life jacket in water; cannot identify who.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "Does not contradict Nicholas claiming to be provider.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-034", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Held floating boat fragment; unsure it was same left-side part she leaned on before collision.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:41:37–01:43:06", "source_anchor": "P1-014137", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-034", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:41:37", "end": "01:43:06", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Held floating boat fragment; unsure it was same left-side part she leaned on before collision.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-035", "part": "I", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "statement": "Tyrone sat on bench ahead after helm change; she observed no lookout communication.", "status": "eyewitness account", "source": "I 01:50:49–01:51:56", "source_anchor": "P1-015049", "caveat": "Not observing lookout activity does not prove no assignment.", "original": { "id": "P1-035", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:50:49", "end": "01:51:56", "speaker": "Roxan Bonapart", "claim": "Tyrone sat on bench ahead after helm change; she observed no lookout communication.", "evidence_status": "eyewitness_account", "editorial_note": "Not observing lookout activity does not prove no assignment.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-036", "part": "I", "speaker": "Secretary and Chair", "statement": "Elias Nicholas identified as another Ocean Angel occupant and present to testify.", "status": "procedural identification", "source": "I 01:59:00–01:59:49", "source_anchor": "P1-015900", "caveat": "Cousin relationship tentatively put by chair; incomplete manifest.", "original": { "id": "P1-036", "source_part": 1, "start": "01:59:00", "end": "01:59:49", "speaker": "Secretary and Chair", "claim": "Elias Nicholas identified as another Ocean Angel occupant and present to testify.", "evidence_status": "procedural_identification", "editorial_note": "Cousin relationship tentatively put by chair; incomplete manifest.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-037", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Adopts 8 September statement; initially offers no corrections; mentions injury-related memory problems.", "status": "sworn adoption", "source": "I 02:03:37–02:05:55", "source_anchor": "P1-020337", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-037", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:03:37", "end": "02:05:55", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Adopts 8 September statement; initially offers no corrections; mentions injury-related memory problems.", "evidence_status": "sworn_adoption", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-038", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Grade II licence; 10-plus years steering boats; three of four company boats operational; took helm near place rendered Anse Mamin.", "status": "sworn account", "source": "I 02:07:07–02:09:34", "source_anchor": "P1-020707", "caveat": "Place spelling and licence scope need source verification.", "original": { "id": "P1-038", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:07:07", "end": "02:09:34", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Grade II licence; 10-plus years steering boats; three of four company boats operational; took helm near place rendered Anse Mamin.", "evidence_status": "sworn_account", "editorial_note": "Place spelling and licence scope need source verification.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-039", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Ocean Angel powered by one 200 hp engine.", "status": "sworn specification", "source": "I 02:09:34–02:10:10", "source_anchor": "P1-020934", "caveat": "No engine make, hull length or construction established.", "original": { "id": "P1-039", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:09:34", "end": "02:10:10", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Ocean Angel powered by one 200 hp engine.", "evidence_status": "sworn_specification", "editorial_note": "No engine make, hull length or construction established.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-040", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Nine total aboard: Nicholas captain, Tyrone first mate, seven passengers.", "status": "admission", "source": "I 02:18:22–02:19:07", "source_anchor": "P1-021822", "caveat": "Transcript often calls all nine passengers; use explicit breakdown.", "original": { "id": "P1-040", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:18:22", "end": "02:19:07", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Nine total aboard: Nicholas captain, Tyrone first mate, seven passengers.", "evidence_status": "admission", "editorial_note": "Transcript often calls all nine passengers; use explicit breakdown.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-041", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "No safety briefing before departure or prior to helm change.", "status": "admission", "source": "I 02:10:10–02:10:58", "source_anchor": "P1-021010", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-041", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:10:10", "end": "02:10:58", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "No safety briefing before departure or prior to helm change.", "evidence_status": "admission", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-042", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Visibility moderate, partly cloudy; Tyrone assigned as lookout after helm change.", "status": "sworn account disputed", "source": "I 02:10:58–02:12:08", "source_anchor": "P1-021058", "caveat": "Passenger did not observe lookout behaviour and described poor visibility.", "original": { "id": "P1-042", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:10:58", "end": "02:12:08", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Visibility moderate, partly cloudy; Tyrone assigned as lookout after helm change.", "evidence_status": "sworn_account_disputed", "editorial_note": "Passenger did not observe lookout behaviour and described poor visibility.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-043", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Saw red and green lights ahead; turned starboard, correcting initial port wording; no report from lookout and no communication to him.", "status": "sworn account", "source": "I 02:15:34–02:18:22", "source_anchor": "P1-021534", "caveat": "No independent track or moment-of-sighting timing.", "original": { "id": "P1-043", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:15:34", "end": "02:18:22", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Saw red and green lights ahead; turned starboard, correcting initial port wording; no report from lookout and no communication to him.", "evidence_status": "sworn_account", "editorial_note": "No independent track or moment-of-sighting timing.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-044", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / commissioner", "statement": "Captain describes variable 3000/3500–4500 rpm; agrees with commissioner-supplied speed estimate 25–35 knots.", "status": "prompted estimate", "source": "I 02:17:51–02:18:22", "source_anchor": "P1-021751", "caveat": "Not GPS evidence; RPM/hp not a reliable stand-alone speed calculation.", "original": { "id": "P1-044", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:17:51", "end": "02:18:22", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / commissioner", "claim": "Captain describes variable 3000/3500–4500 rpm; agrees with commissioner-supplied speed estimate 25–35 knots.", "evidence_status": "prompted_estimate", "editorial_note": "Not GPS evidence; RPM/hp not a reliable stand-alone speed calculation.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-045", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Approximately 15 minutes from helm change near Anse Mamin to collision.", "status": "sworn time estimate", "source": "I 02:19:41–02:20:23", "source_anchor": "P1-021941", "caveat": "NOT an asserted 15 minutes from light sighting to impact; later questioning conflates.", "original": { "id": "P1-045", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:19:41", "end": "02:20:23", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Approximately 15 minutes from helm change near Anse Mamin to collision.", "evidence_status": "sworn_time_estimate", "editorial_note": "NOT an asserted 15 minutes from light sighting to impact; later questioning conflates.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-046", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Did not notify lighthouse or other agency/family of departure despite acknowledged duty to report to lighthouse.", "status": "admission", "source": "I 02:21:09–02:22:10", "source_anchor": "P1-022109", "caveat": "Applicable legal requirement needs verification.", "original": { "id": "P1-046", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:21:09", "end": "02:22:10", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Did not notify lighthouse or other agency/family of departure despite acknowledged duty to report to lighthouse.", "evidence_status": "admission", "editorial_note": "Applicable legal requirement needs verification.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-047", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Estimated 200–300 feet offshore; recalls other boat hitting starboard side.", "status": "sworn estimate disputed", "source": "I 02:27:48–02:28:44", "source_anchor": "P1-022748", "caveat": "Offshore distance is NOT vessel separation.", "original": { "id": "P1-047", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:27:48", "end": "02:28:44", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Estimated 200–300 feet offshore; recalls other boat hitting starboard side.", "evidence_status": "sworn_estimate_disputed", "editorial_note": "Offshore distance is NOT vessel separation.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-048", "part": "I", "speaker": "Commissioner / Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Commissioner says damage suggests Ocean Angel port side and other craft starboard side, a crossing; Nicholas says recollection is starboard but has not seen wreck.", "status": "panel proposition and dispute", "source": "I 02:28:44–02:30:39", "source_anchor": "P1-022844", "caveat": "No underlying forensic exhibit reproduced; not final finding.", "original": { "id": "P1-048", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:28:44", "end": "02:30:39", "speaker": "Commissioner / Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Commissioner says damage suggests Ocean Angel port side and other craft starboard side, a crossing; Nicholas says recollection is starboard but has not seen wreck.", "evidence_status": "panel_proposition_and_dispute", "editorial_note": "No underlying forensic exhibit reproduced; not final finding.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-049", "part": "I", "speaker": "Commissioner / Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Commissioner proposes sharp port turn would avoid impact and selected action caused collision; Nicholas rejects causation conclusion.", "status": "panel counterfactual disputed", "source": "I 02:30:39–02:32:46", "source_anchor": "P1-023039", "caveat": "Do not adopt as proven navigational reconstruction.", "original": { "id": "P1-049", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:30:39", "end": "02:32:46", "speaker": "Commissioner / Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Commissioner proposes sharp port turn would avoid impact and selected action caused collision; Nicholas rejects causation conclusion.", "evidence_status": "panel_counterfactual_disputed", "editorial_note": "Do not adopt as proven navigational reconstruction.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-050", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Nobody wore life jacket; 14 aboard claimed; captain wore none.", "status": "admission and inventory claim", "source": "I 02:33:25–02:34:30", "source_anchor": "P1-023325", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-050", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:33:25", "end": "02:34:30", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Nobody wore life jacket; 14 aboard claimed; captain wore none.", "evidence_status": "admission_and_inventory_claim", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-051", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Claims VHF, first aid and inspection safety equipment aboard; admits no briefing on taking helm and no reason for omission.", "status": "admission and inventory claim", "source": "I 02:34:30–02:36:13", "source_anchor": "P1-023430", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-051", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:34:30", "end": "02:36:13", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Claims VHF, first aid and inspection safety equipment aboard; admits no briefing on taking helm and no reason for omission.", "evidence_status": "admission_and_inventory_claim", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-052", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Navigation lights off from Soufriere departure to helm change; aware but did not correct earlier; claims switched lights on when taking helm.", "status": "admission plus disputed assertion", "source": "I 02:37:40–02:39:27", "source_anchor": "P1-023740", "caveat": "Departure darkness admitted; later operation disputed by passenger.", "original": { "id": "P1-052", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:37:40", "end": "02:39:27", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Navigation lights off from Soufriere departure to helm change; aware but did not correct earlier; claims switched lights on when taking helm.", "evidence_status": "admission_plus_disputed_assertion", "editorial_note": "Departure darkness admitted; later operation disputed by passenger.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-053", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Gave Bonapart one life jacket within estimated five minutes; initially saw only her and cannot account for other seven at that moment.", "status": "sworn rescue account", "source": "I 02:40:08–02:42:37", "source_anchor": "P1-024008", "caveat": "No independent timing; survivor cannot identify provider herself.", "original": { "id": "P1-053", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:40:08", "end": "02:42:37", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Gave Bonapart one life jacket within estimated five minutes; initially saw only her and cannot account for other seven at that moment.", "evidence_status": "sworn_rescue_account", "editorial_note": "No independent timing; survivor cannot identify provider herself.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-054", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Called marine police and Soufriere contacts, left phone with other captain and searched water.", "status": "sworn rescue account", "source": "I 02:42:37–02:44:11", "source_anchor": "P1-024237", "caveat": "Requires calls and response logs for confirmation.", "original": { "id": "P1-054", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:42:37", "end": "02:44:11", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Called marine police and Soufriere contacts, left phone with other captain and searched water.", "evidence_status": "sworn_rescue_account", "editorial_note": "Requires calls and response logs for confirmation.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-055", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Boat cut in half/overturned; bow equipment storage opened and life jackets floated.", "status": "sworn damage account", "source": "I 02:43:26–02:44:52", "source_anchor": "P1-024326", "caveat": "Definitive wreck disposition not established.", "original": { "id": "P1-055", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:43:26", "end": "02:44:52", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Boat cut in half/overturned; bow equipment storage opened and life jackets floated.", "evidence_status": "sworn_damage_account", "editorial_note": "Definitive wreck disposition not established.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-056", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / quoted police statement", "statement": "Oral floating-lifejacket account differs from statement saying he dived to retrieve one; cites injury and exhausting interview.", "status": "material inconsistency", "source": "I 02:44:52–02:47:03", "source_anchor": "P1-024452", "caveat": "Do not label lie; memory explanation not medically assessed.", "original": { "id": "P1-056", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:44:52", "end": "02:47:03", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / quoted police statement", "claim": "Oral floating-lifejacket account differs from statement saying he dived to retrieve one; cites injury and exhausting interview.", "evidence_status": "material_inconsistency", "editorial_note": "Do not label lie; memory explanation not medically assessed.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-057", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Handheld flares aboard but inaccessible in cabin; cannot recall flare training.", "status": "sworn account", "source": "I 02:47:41–02:49:32", "source_anchor": "P1-024741", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-057", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:47:41", "end": "02:49:32", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Handheld flares aboard but inaccessible in cabin; cannot recall flare training.", "evidence_status": "sworn_account", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-058", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Insists lights on and argues passenger could not see forward-mounted lights from seat.", "status": "sworn account disputed", "source": "I 02:49:32–03:01:14", "source_anchor": "P1-024932", "caveat": "Needs geometry and light fixture/electrical evidence; observation vs inference distinction.", "original": { "id": "P1-058", "source_part": 1, "start": "02:49:32", "end": "03:01:14", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Insists lights on and argues passenger could not see forward-mounted lights from seat.", "evidence_status": "sworn_account_disputed", "editorial_note": "Needs geometry and light fixture/electrical evidence; observation vs inference distinction.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-059", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Had two shandy-like cocktails with dinner before trip; denies impairment.", "status": "admission", "source": "I 03:01:14–03:03:44", "source_anchor": "P1-030114", "caveat": "Coffee/water first answer reflected confusion with hearing day. No toxicology; not proof intoxication.", "original": { "id": "P1-059", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:01:14", "end": "03:03:44", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Had two shandy-like cocktails with dinner before trip; denies impairment.", "evidence_status": "admission", "editorial_note": "Coffee/water first answer reflected confusion with hearing day. No toxicology; not proof intoxication.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-060", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Usually reports lighthouse for Castries cruise trips, rarely for Soufriere trips; never questioned about omission.", "status": "admission of practice", "source": "I 03:03:44–03:05:55", "source_anchor": "P1-030344", "caveat": "Verify logs and legal reporting scope.", "original": { "id": "P1-060", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:03:44", "end": "03:05:55", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Usually reports lighthouse for Castries cruise trips, rarely for Soufriere trips; never questioned about omission.", "evidence_status": "admission_of_practice", "editorial_note": "Verify logs and legal reporting scope.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-061", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair / Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Chair puts maximum capacity 12; Nicholas explains 14 jackets as extras.", "status": "document proposition partly acknowledged", "source": "I 03:05:55–03:06:36", "source_anchor": "P1-030555", "caveat": "Verify whether certified limit 12 includes crew.", "original": { "id": "P1-061", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:05:55", "end": "03:06:36", "speaker": "Chair / Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Chair puts maximum capacity 12; Nicholas explains 14 jackets as extras.", "evidence_status": "document_proposition_partly_acknowledged", "editorial_note": "Verify whether certified limit 12 includes crew.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-062", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Denies excessive speed, speed change, push-the-boat quotation and requests to slow down.", "status": "sworn account disputed", "source": "I 03:08:27–03:11:25", "source_anchor": "P1-030827", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-062", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:08:27", "end": "03:11:25", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Denies excessive speed, speed change, push-the-boat quotation and requests to slow down.", "evidence_status": "sworn_account_disputed", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-063", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Navigation lights mounted at edge of bow, on part that went missing.", "status": "sworn configuration claim", "source": "I 03:16:14–03:16:46", "source_anchor": "P1-031614", "caveat": "Exact geometry not documented by photo in transcript.", "original": { "id": "P1-063", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:16:14", "end": "03:16:46", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Navigation lights mounted at edge of bow, on part that went missing.", "evidence_status": "sworn_configuration_claim", "editorial_note": "Exact geometry not documented by photo in transcript.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-064", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / commissioner", "statement": "Sighting separation estimated as three utility poles, later 300 feet; offshore distance initially conflated; 15-minute estimate again describes helm-change route.", "status": "unstable estimates", "source": "I 03:18:01–03:20:24", "source_anchor": "P1-031801", "caveat": "Earlier commissioner estimated same poles 60–75 feet. Do not plot exact encounter.", "original": { "id": "P1-064", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:18:01", "end": "03:20:24", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / commissioner", "claim": "Sighting separation estimated as three utility poles, later 300 feet; offshore distance initially conflated; 15-minute estimate again describes helm-change route.", "evidence_status": "unstable_estimates", "editorial_note": "Earlier commissioner estimated same poles 60–75 feet. Do not plot exact encounter.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-065", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / commissioner", "statement": "Nicholas estimates 20 minutes Soufriere to impact; commissioner claims implies higher speed without establishing route distance.", "status": "sworn estimate and unverified inference", "source": "I 03:22:54–03:25:08", "source_anchor": "P1-032254", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-065", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:22:54", "end": "03:25:08", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / commissioner", "claim": "Nicholas estimates 20 minutes Soufriere to impact; commissioner claims implies higher speed without establishing route distance.", "evidence_status": "sworn_estimate_and_unverified_inference", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-066", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / commissioner", "statement": "Certificate names Graham Matthew as minimum certified crew; Matthew absent; Nicholas says unfamiliar with no-change condition and acknowledges poor judgment allowing Tyrone helm.", "status": "document description and admission", "source": "I 03:25:08–03:28:05", "source_anchor": "P1-032508", "caveat": "Need original certificate and lawful substitution rules.", "original": { "id": "P1-066", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:25:08", "end": "03:28:05", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas / commissioner", "claim": "Certificate names Graham Matthew as minimum certified crew; Matthew absent; Nicholas says unfamiliar with no-change condition and acknowledges poor judgment allowing Tyrone helm.", "evidence_status": "document_description_and_admission", "editorial_note": "Need original certificate and lawful substitution rules.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-067", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "After viewing 23 January 2026 inspection certificate, denies signature is his.", "status": "sworn document challenge", "source": "I 03:28:05–03:30:31", "source_anchor": "P1-032805", "caveat": "Not evidence sufficient to conclude forgery; signatory field and authority unknown.", "original": { "id": "P1-067", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:28:05", "end": "03:30:31", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "After viewing 23 January 2026 inspection certificate, denies signature is his.", "evidence_status": "sworn_document_challenge", "editorial_note": "Not evidence sufficient to conclude forgery; signatory field and authority unknown.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-068", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "No SLASPA officer spoke with him about accident.", "status": "sworn account", "source": "I 03:30:31–03:31:12", "source_anchor": "P1-033031", "caveat": "Does not prove no attempt or indirect use of police statement.", "original": { "id": "P1-068", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:30:31", "end": "03:31:12", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "No SLASPA officer spoke with him about accident.", "evidence_status": "sworn_account", "editorial_note": "Does not prove no attempt or indirect use of police statement.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-069", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Annual renewal inspection confirmed; other dock checks and general SLASPA presence described, but frequency on own vessel uncertain.", "status": "sworn regulatory account", "source": "I 03:31:12–03:35:22", "source_anchor": "P1-033112", "caveat": "Four times a week referred to Soufriere presence, expressly not checks of own vessel.", "original": { "id": "P1-069", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:31:12", "end": "03:35:22", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Annual renewal inspection confirmed; other dock checks and general SLASPA presence described, but frequency on own vessel uncertain.", "evidence_status": "sworn_regulatory_account", "editorial_note": "Four times a week referred to Soufriere presence, expressly not checks of own vessel.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-070", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "On-water encounters with enforcement rare, approximately once per year.", "status": "sworn regulatory account", "source": "I 03:35:22–03:36:08", "source_anchor": "P1-033522", "caveat": "Distinguish from annual inspection and dock presence.", "original": { "id": "P1-070", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:35:22", "end": "03:36:08", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "On-water encounters with enforcement rare, approximately once per year.", "evidence_status": "sworn_regulatory_account", "editorial_note": "Distinguish from annual inspection and dock presence.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-071", "part": "I", "speaker": "Commissioner / Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Graham Matthew said listed as Ocean Angel crew and Kazoula Boatmaster; commissioner infers two craft should not operate together under these conditions.", "status": "document proposition and legal inference", "source": "I 03:36:08–03:38:04", "source_anchor": "P1-033608", "caveat": "Obtain both certificates; no final legal finding.", "original": { "id": "P1-071", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:36:08", "end": "03:38:04", "speaker": "Commissioner / Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Graham Matthew said listed as Ocean Angel crew and Kazoula Boatmaster; commissioner infers two craft should not operate together under these conditions.", "evidence_status": "document_proposition_and_legal_inference", "editorial_note": "Obtain both certificates; no final legal finding.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-072", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Did not conduct usual predeparture equipment check or read weather advisory; unaware of small-craft advisory.", "status": "admission", "source": "I 03:38:04–03:39:27", "source_anchor": "P1-033804", "caveat": "Does not establish exact advisory existed or its terms.", "original": { "id": "P1-072", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:38:04", "end": "03:39:27", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Did not conduct usual predeparture equipment check or read weather advisory; unaware of small-craft advisory.", "evidence_status": "admission", "editorial_note": "Does not establish exact advisory existed or its terms.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-073", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Says sunny day, some rain at night; could not recall last clear memory before impact when asked.", "status": "sworn account", "source": "I 03:39:27–03:40:49", "source_anchor": "P1-033927", "caveat": "", "original": { "id": "P1-073", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:39:27", "end": "03:40:49", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Says sunny day, some rain at night; could not recall last clear memory before impact when asked.", "evidence_status": "sworn_account", "editorial_note": "", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-074", "part": "I", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "statement": "Runs festival transfers into early morning, sometimes 2:30; recalls no enforcement stop; sleeps aboard while waiting.", "status": "sworn general practice", "source": "I 03:50:33–03:53:53", "source_anchor": "P1-035033", "caveat": "Does not establish fatigue on incident trip or illegality of nighttime service.", "original": { "id": "P1-074", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:50:33", "end": "03:53:53", "speaker": "Dylan Nicholas", "claim": "Runs festival transfers into early morning, sometimes 2:30; recalls no enforcement stop; sleeps aboard while waiting.", "evidence_status": "sworn_general_practice", "editorial_note": "Does not establish fatigue on incident trip or illegality of nighttime service.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P1-075", "part": "I", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Nicholas discharged subject to recall; recess announced until 3 p.m.", "status": "procedural record", "source": "I 03:53:53–03:57:30", "source_anchor": "P1-035353", "caveat": "Part I contains no final findings.", "original": { "id": "P1-075", "source_part": 1, "start": "03:53:53", "end": "03:57:30", "speaker": "Chair", "claim": "Nicholas discharged subject to recall; recess announced until 3 p.m.", "evidence_status": "procedural_record", "editorial_note": "Part I contains no final findings.", "entities": [] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C01", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Elias Nicholas identifies himself as a fisherman from Bridge Street; town transcribed as Suare.", "status": "identity testimony", "source": "II P2-001 / P2-U0009", "source_anchor": "P2-001", "caveat": "Confirm town as Soufrière externally; do not silently treat ASR place spelling as authoritative.", "exact_excerpt": "I'm Elias Nicholas. I'm from Suare. Bridge Street.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C01", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "identity testimony", "statement": "Elias Nicholas identifies himself as a fisherman from Bridge Street; town transcribed as Suare.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0009" ], "start_char": 588, "end_char_exclusive": 638, "exact_source_excerpt": "I'm Elias Nicholas. I'm from Suare. Bridge Street.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Confirm town as Soufrière externally; do not silently treat ASR place spelling as authoritative.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-001" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C02", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he had not given police a statement and that no officer came to obtain one.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-001 / P2-U0019, P2-U0020", "source_anchor": "P2-001", "caveat": "Only his account of contact; police collection records have not been examined.", "exact_excerpt": "No officer ever came to check you for a statement? >> No.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C02", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Nicholas says he had not given police a statement and that no officer came to obtain one.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0019", "P2-U0020" ], "start_char": 934, "end_char_exclusive": 991, "exact_source_excerpt": "No officer ever came to check you for a statement? >> No.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Only his account of contact; police collection records have not been examined.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-001" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C03", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he boarded at the Soufrière jetty sometime after 10 p.m. on the Saturday referred to as July 18, 2026.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-002 / P2-U0024, P2-U0025", "source_anchor": "P2-002", "caveat": "Place and year need confirmation from official record; approximate departure time.", "exact_excerpt": "I bought it on the um on board on the jetty in Suare. And about what time was that? >> Around after 10.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C03", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Nicholas says he boarded at the Soufrière jetty sometime after 10 p.m. on the Saturday referred to as July 18, 2026.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0024", "P2-U0025" ], "start_char": 1256, "end_char_exclusive": 1359, "exact_source_excerpt": "I bought it on the um on board on the jetty in Suare. And about what time was that? >> Around after 10.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Place and year need confirmation from official record; approximate departure time.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-002" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C04", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chair and Elias Nicholas", "statement": "The chair reconciles Nicholas's list to nine aboard Ocean Angel: Tyrone, Roxan, Debbie, an unnamed woman from Choiseul, Bradley, Marvin, Marley, Dylan and Nicholas.", "status": "manifest clarification", "source": "II P2-031 / P2-U0522", "source_anchor": "P2-031", "caveat": "First names have ASR variants; woman's origin and every full name require independent confirmation. Earlier answer of eight is corrected by enumeration.", "exact_excerpt": "Tyrone 1, Roxan 2, Debbie 3, A Girl from Shiselle 4, Bradley 5, Marvin 6, Molly 7, or Marley 7, sorry, the captain 8, and I nine.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C04", "person": "Chair and Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "manifest clarification", "statement": "The chair reconciles Nicholas's list to nine aboard Ocean Angel: Tyrone, Roxan, Debbie, an unnamed woman from Choiseul, Bradley, Marvin, Marley, Dylan and Nicholas.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0522" ], "start_char": 34010, "end_char_exclusive": 34139, "exact_source_excerpt": "Tyrone 1, Roxan 2, Debbie 3, A Girl from Shiselle 4, Bradley 5, Marvin 6, Molly 7, or Marley 7, sorry, the captain 8, and I nine.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "First names have ASR variants; woman's origin and every full name require independent confirmation. Earlier answer of eight is corrected by enumeration.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-031" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C05", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas describes Dylan Nicholas as his fifth cousin, and says they are not close.", "status": "relationship testimony", "source": "II P2-003 / P2-U0056, P2-U0057", "source_anchor": "P2-003", "caveat": "Relationship is self-reported.", "exact_excerpt": "What? What are you to him? >> His fifth cousin.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C05", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "relationship testimony", "statement": "Nicholas describes Dylan Nicholas as his fifth cousin, and says they are not close.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0056", "P2-U0057" ], "start_char": 2457, "end_char_exclusive": 2504, "exact_source_excerpt": "What? What are you to him? >> His fifth cousin.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Relationship is self-reported.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-003" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C06", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Tyrone initially operated Ocean Angel; Dylan later took over.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-003, P2-004 / P2-U0070, P2-U0071, P2-U0072, P2-U0073", "source_anchor": "P2-003", "caveat": "Dan/Tyran are ASR variants within a passage consistently about Dylan/Tyrone.", "exact_excerpt": "So Tyran was captain and the boat traveled some distance. >> Yeah. >> Before Dan took over. >> Yes.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C06", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Tyrone initially operated Ocean Angel; Dylan later took over.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0070", "P2-U0071", "P2-U0072", "P2-U0073" ], "start_char": 3058, "end_char_exclusive": 3157, "exact_source_excerpt": "So Tyran was captain and the boat traveled some distance. >> Yeah. >> Before Dan took over. >> Yes.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Dan/Tyran are ASR variants within a passage consistently about Dylan/Tyrone.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-003", "P2-004" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C07", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas recalls Dylan saying words to the effect of let me captain, I will show you how to cap.", "status": "recalled speech", "source": "II P2-004 / P2-U0081", "source_anchor": "P2-004", "caveat": "Quote is reconstructed through examiner repetition and witness agreement, not a recording of the original conversation; exact wording varies.", "exact_excerpt": "He said, \"What? Sorry. Let me captain, I will show you how to cap.\"", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C07", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "recalled speech", "statement": "Nicholas recalls Dylan saying words to the effect of let me captain, I will show you how to cap.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0081" ], "start_char": 3675, "end_char_exclusive": 3742, "exact_source_excerpt": "He said, \"What? Sorry. Let me captain, I will show you how to cap.\"", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Quote is reconstructed through examiner repetition and witness agreement, not a recording of the original conversation; exact wording varies.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-004" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C08", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says Tyrone was taking the boat more easily, while Dylan drove faster.", "status": "subjective speed testimony", "source": "II P2-005 / P2-U0089", "source_anchor": "P2-005", "caveat": "No measured speed is provided. ASR Jill refers contextually to Dylan.", "exact_excerpt": "Ty was taking it more easy on the boot, but Jill was going more faster.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C08", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "subjective speed testimony", "statement": "Nicholas says Tyrone was taking the boat more easily, while Dylan drove faster.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0089" ], "start_char": 4305, "end_char_exclusive": 4376, "exact_source_excerpt": "Ty was taking it more easy on the boot, but Jill was going more faster.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "No measured speed is provided. ASR Jill refers contextually to Dylan.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-005" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C09", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says no navigation lights were observed on Ocean Angel at departure or during the journey.", "status": "firsthand perception", "source": "II P2-017 / P2-U0302, P2-U0303, P2-U0304", "source_anchor": "P2-017", "caveat": "Evidence is witness perception, not a technical inspection or final finding that lights were absent or inoperative.", "exact_excerpt": "Did you observe whether there were any navigation lights when he left when the boat left the port of Sufare? >> No lights, my lady. Did you observe whether the lights were switched on at any time during the journey? >> No, my lady.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C09", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand perception", "statement": "Nicholas says no navigation lights were observed on Ocean Angel at departure or during the journey.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0302", "P2-U0303", "P2-U0304" ], "start_char": 17702, "end_char_exclusive": 17933, "exact_source_excerpt": "Did you observe whether there were any navigation lights when he left when the boat left the port of Sufare? >> No lights, my lady. Did you observe whether the lights were switched on at any time during the journey? >> No, my lady.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Evidence is witness perception, not a technical inspection or final finding that lights were absent or inoperative.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-017" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C10", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he was in the forward left seat with Tyrone beside him; nobody was ahead of them.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-015 / P2-U0276, P2-U0277, P2-U0278", "source_anchor": "P2-015", "caveat": "Specific seat/position needs vessel drawing; initial wording about sitting on the bow was clarified to a forward seat.", "exact_excerpt": "Was he sitting next to you? >> Yes, sir. Was there anybody ahead of you? Was there anybody in front of you on time? >> No.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C10", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Nicholas says he was in the forward left seat with Tyrone beside him; nobody was ahead of them.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0276", "P2-U0277", "P2-U0278" ], "start_char": 15715, "end_char_exclusive": 15837, "exact_source_excerpt": "Was he sitting next to you? >> Yes, sir. Was there anybody ahead of you? Was there anybody in front of you on time? >> No.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Specific seat/position needs vessel drawing; initial wording about sitting on the bow was clarified to a forward seat.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-015" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C11", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says the high bow blocked his view ahead, even while stationary unless he adjusted position.", "status": "firsthand perception", "source": "II P2-014 / P2-U0256", "source_anchor": "P2-014", "caveat": "Cannot infer operator's forward visibility from a passenger's lower seating position.", "exact_excerpt": "That's the design of the boat. The bow is just high.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C11", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand perception", "statement": "Nicholas says the high bow blocked his view ahead, even while stationary unless he adjusted position.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0256" ], "start_char": 14069, "end_char_exclusive": 14121, "exact_source_excerpt": "That's the design of the boat. The bow is just high.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Cannot infer operator's forward visibility from a passenger's lower seating position.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-014" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C12", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he did not see an approaching vessel or its lights before the collision.", "status": "firsthand perception", "source": "II P2-014 / P2-U0261, P2-U0262", "source_anchor": "P2-014", "caveat": "Blocked sightline limits the meaning of this non-observation; it cannot establish that the other vessel had no lights.", "exact_excerpt": "Did you ever see the lights of a vessel coming towards the vessel you were on? >> No, sir.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C12", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand perception", "statement": "Nicholas says he did not see an approaching vessel or its lights before the collision.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0261", "P2-U0262" ], "start_char": 14573, "end_char_exclusive": 14663, "exact_source_excerpt": "Did you ever see the lights of a vessel coming towards the vessel you were on? >> No, sir.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Blocked sightline limits the meaning of this non-observation; it cannot establish that the other vessel had no lights.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-014" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C13", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says Debbie, Roxan and the woman from Choiseul asked Dylan to slow down, saying they could not swim; he says he did not slow or reply.", "status": "recalled speech and conduct", "source": "II P2-016 / P2-U0293", "source_anchor": "P2-016", "caveat": "Serious allegation against Dylan; corroborate with surviving witnesses and give him an opportunity to respond.", "exact_excerpt": "the girls was telling him um Dan, you're going too fast. We cannot swim.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C13", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "recalled speech and conduct", "statement": "Nicholas says Debbie, Roxan and the woman from Choiseul asked Dylan to slow down, saying they could not swim; he says he did not slow or reply.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0293" ], "start_char": 17153, "end_char_exclusive": 17225, "exact_source_excerpt": "the girls was telling him um Dan, you're going too fast. We cannot swim.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Serious allegation against Dylan; corroborate with surviving witnesses and give him an opportunity to respond.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-016" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas and chair", "statement": "Nicholas reaffirms that three women complained about speed. His earlier negative answer addressed a question expressly excluding the women; the later suggestion that he had denied all complaints came in the chair’s restatement.", "status": "clarification", "source": "II P2-033 / P2-U0543, P2-U0544", "source_anchor": "P2-033", "caveat": "Read P2-016, P2-025 and P2-032 alongside this exchange. The earlier question said “Other than the girls”; treating its negative answer as a denial that anyone complained would change its scope. Agreement here followed a compound leading summary. This is not a secure self-contradiction.", "exact_excerpt": "By which I understood you to mean he did not take heed. He did not when they said so, he did not slow down as a result of them saying so. In fact, he didn't say anything. He just continued at his speed. That's what I understood you to be saying when you gave your evidence earlier on. Is that correct? >> That's good.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C14", "person": "Elias Nicholas and chair", "evidence_category": "clarification", "statement": "Nicholas reaffirms that three women complained about speed. His earlier negative answer addressed a question expressly excluding the women; the later suggestion that he had denied all complaints came in the chair’s restatement.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0543", "P2-U0544" ], "start_char": 35399, "end_char_exclusive": 35716, "exact_source_excerpt": "By which I understood you to mean he did not take heed. He did not when they said so, he did not slow down as a result of them saying so. In fact, he didn't say anything. He just continued at his speed. That's what I understood you to be saying when you gave your evidence earlier on. Is that correct? >> That's good.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Read P2-016, P2-025 and P2-032 alongside this exchange. The earlier question said “Other than the girls”; treating its negative answer as a denial that anyone complained would change its scope. Agreement here followed a compound leading summary. This is not a secure self-contradiction.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-033" ], "editorial_context_block_ids": [ "P2-016", "P2-025", "P2-032", "P2-033" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C15", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he received no safety briefing and was not issued a life jacket to wear.", "status": "safety procedure testimony", "source": "II P2-018, P2-019 / P2-U0322, P2-U0323, P2-U0324, P2-U0325", "source_anchor": "P2-018", "caveat": "Does not prove there were no life jackets aboard.", "exact_excerpt": "were you given any safety briefing when you got on the boat? >> Nothing like that, sir? Nothing like that? No. >> No. Were you given a life jacket to put on? >> No sir.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C15", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "safety procedure testimony", "statement": "Nicholas says he received no safety briefing and was not issued a life jacket to wear.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0322", "P2-U0323", "P2-U0324", "P2-U0325" ], "start_char": 19211, "end_char_exclusive": 19379, "exact_source_excerpt": "were you given any safety briefing when you got on the boat? >> Nothing like that, sir? Nothing like that? No. >> No. Were you given a life jacket to put on? >> No sir.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Does not prove there were no life jackets aboard.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-018", "P2-019" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C16", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas describes calm conditions at the jetty but choppy conditions and bouncing outside.", "status": "firsthand perception", "source": "II P2-019 / P2-U0334, P2-U0335", "source_anchor": "P2-019", "caveat": "No measured wave height, wind, visibility or sea-state log.", "exact_excerpt": "It was choppy even at the jetty. >> No, the jetty. No, it was um more calm.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C16", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand perception", "statement": "Nicholas describes calm conditions at the jetty but choppy conditions and bouncing outside.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0334", "P2-U0335" ], "start_char": 19711, "end_char_exclusive": 19786, "exact_source_excerpt": "It was choppy even at the jetty. >> No, the jetty. No, it was um more calm.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "No measured wave height, wind, visibility or sea-state log.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-019" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C17", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas explicitly describes the vessel as stable just before impact.", "status": "testimony requiring clarification", "source": "II P2-019 / P2-U0340, P2-U0341, P2-U0342", "source_anchor": "P2-019", "caveat": "Earlier stable/unstable wording is internally ambiguous: his answer appears to say more stable, while the examiner repeats more unstable. Audio is needed to distinguish transcription error from an examiner’s restatement or a witness change. Do not resolve this against him without verification.", "exact_excerpt": "It was stable. >> It was stable just prior to the empire. >> Stable.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C17", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "testimony requiring clarification", "statement": "Nicholas explicitly describes the vessel as stable just before impact.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0340", "P2-U0341", "P2-U0342" ], "start_char": 20108, "end_char_exclusive": 20176, "exact_source_excerpt": "It was stable. >> It was stable just prior to the empire. >> Stable.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Earlier stable/unstable wording is internally ambiguous: his answer appears to say more stable, while the examiner repeats more unstable. Audio is needed to distinguish transcription error from an examiner’s restatement or a witness change. Do not resolve this against him without verification.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-019" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C18", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas reports no warning, siren, VHF communication, or perceived change of direction/speed before impact.", "status": "firsthand perception", "source": "II P2-025 / P2-U0436, P2-U0437", "source_anchor": "P2-025", "caveat": "Non-observation from injured passenger with restricted view; not proof that no control input occurred.", "exact_excerpt": "before just before the accident or the impact so to speak, did you notice or did you feel the captain did anything with the vessel? Go left, go right, slow down the speed. >> Nothing that I just had a a loud noise.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C18", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand perception", "statement": "Nicholas reports no warning, siren, VHF communication, or perceived change of direction/speed before impact.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0436", "P2-U0437" ], "start_char": 26933, "end_char_exclusive": 27147, "exact_source_excerpt": "before just before the accident or the impact so to speak, did you notice or did you feel the captain did anything with the vessel? Go left, go right, slow down the speed. >> Nothing that I just had a a loud noise.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Non-observation from injured passenger with restricted view; not proof that no control input occurred.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-025" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C19", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "After hearing a loud noise, Nicholas found himself in the water and Ocean Angel capsized.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-005 / P2-U0098", "source_anchor": "P2-005", "caveat": "Cannot infer exact collision geometry from this account.", "exact_excerpt": "when I check myself, I check I I I see water. The book cap size already.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C19", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "After hearing a loud noise, Nicholas found himself in the water and Ocean Angel capsized.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0098" ], "start_char": 4943, "end_char_exclusive": 5015, "exact_source_excerpt": "when I check myself, I check I I I see water. The book cap size already.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Cannot infer exact collision geometry from this account.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-005" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C20", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he grabbed a floating life jacket near Ocean Angel and got onto the capsized craft.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-006 / P2-U0112, P2-U0113, P2-U0114", "source_anchor": "P2-006", "caveat": "Jacket origin is not established. Final sinking or recovery of the vessel is not established.", "exact_excerpt": "you grab the the um the life jacket and you're using it to to float. Uh, you held on to it. Yeah. >> Did Sorry. >> Yeah, that's when I um went up on top of the boat and sit down on it capsized.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C20", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Nicholas says he grabbed a floating life jacket near Ocean Angel and got onto the capsized craft.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0112", "P2-U0113", "P2-U0114" ], "start_char": 5754, "end_char_exclusive": 5947, "exact_source_excerpt": "you grab the the um the life jacket and you're using it to to float. Uh, you held on to it. Yeah. >> Did Sorry. >> Yeah, that's when I um went up on top of the boat and sit down on it capsized.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Jacket origin is not established. Final sinking or recovery of the vessel is not established.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-006" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C21", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas saw several people in the water but could not identify them; he heard one male voice calling for help.", "status": "firsthand perception", "source": "II P2-007 / P2-U0133, P2-U0134", "source_anchor": "P2-007", "caveat": "He does not identify the caller or all people nearby.", "exact_excerpt": "I heard someone was shouting, \"Help! Help!\" Does it sound like a male voice or a female voice? >> A male voice.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C21", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand perception", "statement": "Nicholas saw several people in the water but could not identify them; he heard one male voice calling for help.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0133", "P2-U0134" ], "start_char": 6746, "end_char_exclusive": 6857, "exact_source_excerpt": "I heard someone was shouting, \"Help! Help!\" Does it sound like a male voice or a female voice? >> A male voice.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "He does not identify the caller or all people nearby.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-007" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C22", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas estimates a rescue boat reached him about 15 minutes later.", "status": "time estimate", "source": "II P2-008 / P2-U0150, P2-U0151", "source_anchor": "P2-008", "caveat": "Approximate estimate after injury; not independently timed.", "exact_excerpt": "Around 15 minutes after >> about 15 minutes after.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C22", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "time estimate", "statement": "Nicholas estimates a rescue boat reached him about 15 minutes later.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0150", "P2-U0151" ], "start_char": 7996, "end_char_exclusive": 8046, "exact_source_excerpt": "Around 15 minutes after >> about 15 minutes after.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Approximate estimate after injury; not independently timed.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-008" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 adds a Canaries rescue route described by Taylor and Romeon, and a distinct yacht–Ti Kaye route from other Cazorla survivors. Identities and loads must be matched before treating differences as contradictions.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0033", "D2P1-P0130", "D2P3-S037" ] } }, { "id": "P2-C23", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he and Debbie's body were on the rescue boat with its captain and another person, and were taken to Canaries.", "status": "firsthand testimony with uncertainty", "source": "II P2-009 / P2-U0170, P2-U0171", "source_anchor": "P2-009", "caveat": "He did not know whether Debbie was placed aboard before or after him; death, identity and recovery circumstances need medical/rescue corroboration.", "exact_excerpt": "So it was the captain of the boat. One other person. You and Debbie's body. >> Yeah. That's what I see.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C23", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony with uncertainty", "statement": "Nicholas says he and Debbie's body were on the rescue boat with its captain and another person, and were taken to Canaries.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0170", "P2-U0171" ], "start_char": 8907, "end_char_exclusive": 9010, "exact_source_excerpt": "So it was the captain of the boat. One other person. You and Debbie's body. >> Yeah. That's what I see.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "He did not know whether Debbie was placed aboard before or after him; death, identity and recovery circumstances need medical/rescue corroboration.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-009" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 adds a Canaries rescue route described by Taylor and Romeon, and a distinct yacht–Ti Kaye route from other Cazorla survivors. Identities and loads must be matched before treating differences as contradictions.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0033", "D2P1-P0130", "D2P3-S037" ] } }, { "id": "P2-C24", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas specifically rejects a suggestion that he had said Debbie was on top of the capsized vessel.", "status": "clarification", "source": "II P2-011 / P2-U0203, P2-U0204", "source_anchor": "P2-011", "caveat": "Do not illustrate Debbie on the overturned boat or say she was recovered from it on this evidence.", "exact_excerpt": "You say also that Debbie was on that capsized book. >> No, I never said that.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C24", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "clarification", "statement": "Nicholas specifically rejects a suggestion that he had said Debbie was on top of the capsized vessel.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0203", "P2-U0204" ], "start_char": 11054, "end_char_exclusive": 11131, "exact_source_excerpt": "You say also that Debbie was on that capsized book. >> No, I never said that.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Do not illustrate Debbie on the overturned boat or say she was recovered from it on this evidence.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-011" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C25", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas recalls being landed at Canaries, an ambulance being called, then losing awareness until hospital.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-009 / P2-U0172", "source_anchor": "P2-009", "caveat": "He cannot recount transport from jetty to hospital.", "exact_excerpt": "They dropped us on by the jetty in Canaries and they called for the ambulance.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C25", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Nicholas recalls being landed at Canaries, an ambulance being called, then losing awareness until hospital.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0172" ], "start_char": 9097, "end_char_exclusive": 9175, "exact_source_excerpt": "They dropped us on by the jetty in Canaries and they called for the ambulance.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "He cannot recount transport from jetty to hospital.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-009" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C26", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas reports a broken left leg, a head wound, and surgery to his leg at a facility transcribed Oku.", "status": "injury testimony", "source": "II P2-010 / P2-U0183", "source_anchor": "P2-010", "caveat": "Obtain consent/medical corroboration for detailed medical claims; likely OKEU but not established by this source alone.", "exact_excerpt": "had a broken leg, my left leg.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C26", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "injury testimony", "statement": "Nicholas reports a broken left leg, a head wound, and surgery to his leg at a facility transcribed Oku.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0183" ], "start_char": 10060, "end_char_exclusive": 10090, "exact_source_excerpt": "had a broken leg, my left leg.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Obtain consent/medical corroboration for detailed medical claims; likely OKEU but not established by this source alone.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-010" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C27", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas identifies himself as a passenger, not a crew member or captain.", "status": "clarification", "source": "II P2-028 / P2-U0470, P2-U0471, P2-U0472", "source_anchor": "P2-028", "caveat": "Being a fisherman does not establish that he owed the operational duties of crew on this trip.", "exact_excerpt": "I was a passenger. >> Passenger. >> Not a crew member.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C27", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "clarification", "statement": "Nicholas identifies himself as a passenger, not a crew member or captain.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0470", "P2-U0471", "P2-U0472" ], "start_char": 29916, "end_char_exclusive": 29970, "exact_source_excerpt": "I was a passenger. >> Passenger. >> Not a crew member.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Being a fisherman does not establish that he owed the operational duties of crew on this trip.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-028" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C28", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he did not see anybody relaying observations ahead to the captain.", "status": "firsthand perception", "source": "II P2-022 / P2-U0389, P2-U0390, P2-U0391", "source_anchor": "P2-022", "caveat": "Commissioner inference follows narrower witness evidence; earlier Nicholas said he did not know if anyone was acting as lookout.", "exact_excerpt": "Was there anybody? >> Nobody sir. >> So it would be fair to say that there was not a lookout.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C28", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand perception", "statement": "Nicholas says he did not see anybody relaying observations ahead to the captain.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0389", "P2-U0390", "P2-U0391" ], "start_char": 23452, "end_char_exclusive": 23545, "exact_source_excerpt": "Was there anybody? >> Nobody sir. >> So it would be fair to say that there was not a lookout.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Commissioner inference follows narrower witness evidence; earlier Nicholas said he did not know if anyone was acting as lookout.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-022" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C29", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says Dylan was on the capsized boat attempting a phone call while a male voice called for help.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-024 / P2-U0417, P2-U0418, P2-U0419, P2-U0420", "source_anchor": "P2-024", "caveat": "Ambiguous initial exchange and pronouns; supports attempted calling, not call recipient, success, timing, or abandonment of rescue duty.", "exact_excerpt": "One voice, >> but he was on the boat making some calls. >> That's correct. >> Yes, sir.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C29", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Nicholas says Dylan was on the capsized boat attempting a phone call while a male voice called for help.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0417", "P2-U0418", "P2-U0419", "P2-U0420" ], "start_char": 25479, "end_char_exclusive": 25566, "exact_source_excerpt": "One voice, >> but he was on the boat making some calls. >> That's correct. >> Yes, sir.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Ambiguous initial exchange and pronouns; supports attempted calling, not call recipient, success, timing, or abandonment of rescue duty.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-024" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C30", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas estimates about 20 minutes from departure to collision, with Dylan taking over after a place transcribed Anshass and operating about 15–16 minutes.", "status": "approximate voyage timing", "source": "II P2-030 / P2-U0497, P2-U0498, P2-U0499", "source_anchor": "P2-030", "caveat": "Likely Anse Chastanet requires geographic confirmation; commissioner derives 5 minutes/one-third route and says boat was flying, neither is a measured navigation finding.", "exact_excerpt": "around 15 16 minutes sir >> 15 >> 16 minutes", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C30", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "approximate voyage timing", "statement": "Nicholas estimates about 20 minutes from departure to collision, with Dylan taking over after a place transcribed Anshass and operating about 15–16 minutes.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0497", "P2-U0498", "P2-U0499" ], "start_char": 32401, "end_char_exclusive": 32445, "exact_source_excerpt": "around 15 16 minutes sir >> 15 >> 16 minutes", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Likely Anse Chastanet requires geographic confirmation; commissioner derives 5 minutes/one-third route and says boat was flying, neither is a measured navigation finding.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-030" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C31", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas thinks impact was sideways and on the right because he was seated on the left and believes a head-on or left-side impact would have killed him.", "status": "inference not eyewitness geometry", "source": "II P2-026 / P2-U0444", "source_anchor": "P2-026", "caveat": "He never saw the approaching vessel. Do not present right-side impact as established.", "exact_excerpt": "No, I think I I think it's on the right side. If it was on the left side, I would have be dead.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C31", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "inference not eyewitness geometry", "statement": "Nicholas thinks impact was sideways and on the right because he was seated on the left and believes a head-on or left-side impact would have killed him.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0444" ], "start_char": 27846, "end_char_exclusive": 27941, "exact_source_excerpt": "No, I think I I think it's on the right side. If it was on the left side, I would have be dead.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "He never saw the approaching vessel. Do not present right-side impact as established.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-026" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C32", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says nobody drank, ate or smoked during the voyage, but could not say what others consumed before he boarded.", "status": "firsthand perception with limit", "source": "II P2-026, P2-027 / P2-U0451, P2-U0452, P2-U0453", "source_anchor": "P2-026", "caveat": "No alcohol consumption observed during voyage is not evidence of sobriety before boarding.", "exact_excerpt": "Nobody wasn't drinking anything. No nothing like that >> or eating anything. >> Eating nothing. Not even smoking.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C32", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "firsthand perception with limit", "statement": "Nicholas says nobody drank, ate or smoked during the voyage, but could not say what others consumed before he boarded.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0451", "P2-U0452", "P2-U0453" ], "start_char": 28514, "end_char_exclusive": 28627, "exact_source_excerpt": "Nobody wasn't drinking anything. No nothing like that >> or eating anything. >> Eating nothing. Not even smoking.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "No alcohol consumption observed during voyage is not evidence of sobriety before boarding.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-026", "P2-027" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C33", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says earlier that he did not feel safe; later says he was not really frightened for his life and that the speed was fast but he had no problem.", "status": "state of mind", "source": "II P2-031 / P2-U0509", "source_anchor": "P2-031", "caveat": "Potential tension, not necessarily contradiction: discomfort and fear for life are different questions.", "exact_excerpt": "It was going fast for me, but I didn't I had no problem.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C33", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "state of mind", "statement": "Nicholas says earlier that he did not feel safe; later says he was not really frightened for his life and that the speed was fast but he had no problem.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0509" ], "start_char": 33384, "end_char_exclusive": 33440, "exact_source_excerpt": "It was going fast for me, but I didn't I had no problem.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Potential tension, not necessarily contradiction: discomfort and fear for life are different questions.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-031" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C34", "part": "II", "speaker": "Elias Nicholas", "statement": "Nicholas says he learned at hospital the following day that four people had died.", "status": "hearsay", "source": "II P2-028 / P2-U0468", "source_anchor": "P2-028", "caveat": "Do not use this damaged sentence as independent proof of death toll or identities.", "exact_excerpt": "you I had four people die but even the same night I heard that the next day when I wake up.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C34", "person": "Elias Nicholas", "evidence_category": "hearsay", "statement": "Nicholas says he learned at hospital the following day that four people had died.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0468" ], "start_char": 29665, "end_char_exclusive": 29756, "exact_source_excerpt": "you I had four people die but even the same night I heard that the next day when I wake up.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Do not use this damaged sentence as independent proof of death toll or identities.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-028" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C35", "part": "II", "speaker": "Commission staff", "statement": "Staff announce owner Ireanius Pascal and captain Tyson Hippolit as the two remaining witnesses from Kaza Jr.", "status": "procedural announcement", "source": "II P2-034 / P2-U0557", "source_anchor": "P2-034", "caveat": "Only Tyson testifies before this part ends; Pascal is announced, not heard. Later development: Pascal testifies in Part III (P3-001 onward).", "exact_excerpt": "So the next two persons were from the other vessel Kaza Jr.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C35", "person": "Commission staff", "evidence_category": "procedural announcement", "statement": "Staff announce owner Ireanius Pascal and captain Tyson Hippolit as the two remaining witnesses from Kaza Jr.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0557" ], "start_char": 36860, "end_char_exclusive": 36919, "exact_source_excerpt": "So the next two persons were from the other vessel Kaza Jr.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Only Tyson testifies before this part ends; Pascal is announced, not heard.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-034" ] }, "later_development": "Part III now contains Pascal’s sworn testimony: P3-C01–P3-C02. This entry records the Part II sequence only.", "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C36", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit (spelling unverified)", "statement": "Tyson confirms giving a police statement July 21, 2026, says it is accurate and stands by it.", "status": "adoption of prior police statement", "source": "II P2-035 / P2-U0575, P2-U0576", "source_anchor": "P2-035", "caveat": "The statement text itself is not attached or fully read aloud.", "exact_excerpt": "Did you on the 21st of July 2026 give a statement to the police about what happened on the night of of Saturday 18th July 2026? >> Yes, sir.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C36", "person": "Tyson Hippolit (spelling unverified)", "evidence_category": "adoption of prior police statement", "statement": "Tyson confirms giving a police statement July 21, 2026, says it is accurate and stands by it.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0575", "P2-U0576" ], "start_char": 37582, "end_char_exclusive": 37722, "exact_source_excerpt": "Did you on the 21st of July 2026 give a statement to the police about what happened on the night of of Saturday 18th July 2026? >> Yes, sir.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "The statement text itself is not attached or fully read aloud.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-035" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C37", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit (spelling unverified)", "statement": "Tyson confirms operating Kaza Jr from Soufrière to Gros Islet around 3 p.m., then on its return with nine aboard.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-036 / P2-U0584, P2-U0585, P2-U0586", "source_anchor": "P2-036", "caveat": "Nine is a total count, not a complete manifest in this part. Do not fill names from speculation.", "exact_excerpt": "There were nine of you on the boat headed back to Sufra. >> Yep. >> And that boat was Kazola Jr.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C37", "person": "Tyson Hippolit (spelling unverified)", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Tyson confirms operating Kaza Jr from Soufrière to Gros Islet around 3 p.m., then on its return with nine aboard.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0584", "P2-U0585", "P2-U0586" ], "start_char": 38433, "end_char_exclusive": 38529, "exact_source_excerpt": "There were nine of you on the boat headed back to Sufra. >> Yep. >> And that boat was Kazola Jr.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Nine is a total count, not a complete manifest in this part. Do not fill names from speculation.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-036" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C38", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit and chair", "statement": "After a licence is shown to him, Tyson accepts that his operator licence expired July 18, 2015.", "status": "document shown and admission", "source": "II P2-049 / P2-U0763, P2-U0764", "source_anchor": "P2-049", "caveat": "Underlying licence/exhibit not supplied; strong hearing evidence of expiry, not independent inspection by us.", "exact_excerpt": "your license to operate a boat expired on the 18th of July 2015. We've shown you the documents. You accept that? >> Yeah.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C38", "person": "Tyson Hippolit and chair", "evidence_category": "document shown and admission", "statement": "After a licence is shown to him, Tyson accepts that his operator licence expired July 18, 2015.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0763", "P2-U0764" ], "start_char": 52769, "end_char_exclusive": 52890, "exact_source_excerpt": "your license to operate a boat expired on the 18th of July 2015. We've shown you the documents. You accept that? >> Yeah.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Underlying licence/exhibit not supplied; strong hearing evidence of expiry, not independent inspection by us.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-049" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C39", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson ultimately agrees that he operated boats without a current licence.", "status": "admission", "source": "II P2-049 / P2-U0769", "source_anchor": "P2-049", "caveat": "Broad exchange does not definitively settle all vessel categories or the legal fishing-licence distinction.", "exact_excerpt": "Well, yes. So, yes, you agree that you've been driving boats without a license. Yes.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C39", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "admission", "statement": "Tyson ultimately agrees that he operated boats without a current licence.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0769" ], "start_char": 53562, "end_char_exclusive": 53646, "exact_source_excerpt": "Well, yes. So, yes, you agree that you've been driving boats without a license. Yes.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Broad exchange does not definitively settle all vessel categories or the legal fishing-licence distinction.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-049" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C40", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson says he had driven Kaza Jr about three or four times; he initially presents his other operation as mainly his fishing boat.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-037 / P2-U0617", "source_anchor": "P2-037", "caveat": "No independently verified operating history or count.", "exact_excerpt": "Well, I only drove this boat maybe three three to four times.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C40", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Tyson says he had driven Kaza Jr about three or four times; he initially presents his other operation as mainly his fishing boat.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0617" ], "start_char": 40491, "end_char_exclusive": 40552, "exact_source_excerpt": "Well, I only drove this boat maybe three three to four times.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "No independently verified operating history or count.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-037" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C41", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson accepts consuming at least four Piton beers and denies additional alcoholic drinks.", "status": "admission", "source": "II P2-040 / P2-U0653, P2-U0654", "source_anchor": "P2-040", "caveat": "Brand Piton is inferred from repeated ASR variants. Time window, bottle size and BAC are not established; consumption is not a finding of intoxication or causation.", "exact_excerpt": "Very well. So, but you are agreeing that you had at least four pure bears. >> Mhm.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C41", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "admission", "statement": "Tyson accepts consuming at least four Piton beers and denies additional alcoholic drinks.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0653", "P2-U0654" ], "start_char": 42975, "end_char_exclusive": 43057, "exact_source_excerpt": "Very well. So, but you are agreeing that you had at least four pure bears. >> Mhm.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Brand Piton is inferred from repeated ASR variants. Time window, bottle size and BAC are not established; consumption is not a finding of intoxication or causation.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-040" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C42", "part": "II", "speaker": "Boat owner Pascal, quoted by chair", "statement": "Chair reads owner's statement that he bought at least four Piton beers each for Lester, Nile and Tyson and that they had their own money and bought drinks as well.", "status": "secondhand prior statement", "source": "II P2-051 / P2-U0782", "source_anchor": "P2-051", "caveat": "Owner does not give oral evidence in Part II. Spellings, reference to additional purchases and actual consumption remain contested; Tyson denies extra drinks. Part III update: Pascal gives his own purchase account at P3-011–P3-012.", "exact_excerpt": "I would have purchased at least four pet bears each for Leester, Nile, and Tyson. They had they had their own monies and would have purchased their own drinks as well.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C42", "person": "Boat owner Pascal, quoted by chair", "evidence_category": "secondhand prior statement", "statement": "Chair reads owner's statement that he bought at least four Piton beers each for Lester, Nile and Tyson and that they had their own money and bought drinks as well.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0782" ], "start_char": 55172, "end_char_exclusive": 55339, "exact_source_excerpt": "I would have purchased at least four pet bears each for Leester, Nile, and Tyson. They had they had their own monies and would have purchased their own drinks as well.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Owner does not give oral evidence in Part II. Spellings, reference to additional purchases and actual consumption remain contested; Tyson denies extra drinks.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-051" ] }, "later_development": "Pascal’s oral account of purchases appears in P3-C15; keep the statement quotation and the oral evidence distinct.", "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C43", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson says four beers had no effect on him.", "status": "self-assessment", "source": "II P2-040 / P2-U0656, P2-U0657, P2-U0658, P2-U0659", "source_anchor": "P2-040", "caveat": "A subjective claim, not medical/toxicological proof of unimpaired performance.", "exact_excerpt": "So upon consuming four bears, you does it do anything to you? >> No, man. >> Nothing? >> No.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C43", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "self-assessment", "statement": "Tyson says four beers had no effect on him.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0656", "P2-U0657", "P2-U0658", "P2-U0659" ], "start_char": 43284, "end_char_exclusive": 43376, "exact_source_excerpt": "So upon consuming four bears, you does it do anything to you? >> No, man. >> Nothing? >> No.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "A subjective claim, not medical/toxicological proof of unimpaired performance.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-040" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C44", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Fragmented English/Creole passage mentions a 150-horsepower engine, about 3,000–4,000 rpm and a rough 20–24-knot speed.", "status": "vessel/speed estimate in degraded passage", "source": "II P2-041 / P2-U0667", "source_anchor": "P2-041", "caveat": "Speaker turn boundaries and question/answer allocation are unclear; verify audio/exhibits before using numeric speed or engine model publicly.", "exact_excerpt": "150 horsepower 3,000 35 4,000 what you get maybe roughly let me say 20 24 knots about roughly", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C44", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "vessel/speed estimate in degraded passage", "statement": "Fragmented English/Creole passage mentions a 150-horsepower engine, about 3,000–4,000 rpm and a rough 20–24-knot speed.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0667" ], "start_char": 44181, "end_char_exclusive": 44274, "exact_source_excerpt": "150 horsepower 3,000 35 4,000 what you get maybe roughly let me say 20 24 knots about roughly", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Speaker turn boundaries and question/answer allocation are unclear; verify audio/exhibits before using numeric speed or engine model publicly.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-041" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C45", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson insists Kaza Jr's navigation lights were on and says he saw only shore lights before impact.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-041 / P2-U0672, P2-U0673", "source_anchor": "P2-041", "caveat": "Cannot establish regulatory compliance, light sectors, brightness or independent visibility.", "exact_excerpt": "Navigation light on 100% sure. >> 100% sure.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C45", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Tyson insists Kaza Jr's navigation lights were on and says he saw only shore lights before impact.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0672", "P2-U0673" ], "start_char": 44677, "end_char_exclusive": 44721, "exact_source_excerpt": "Navigation light on 100% sure. >> 100% sure.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Cannot establish regulatory compliance, light sectors, brightness or independent visibility.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-041" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 passengers add accounts of Cazorla’s illuminated lights; Chris describes red, green and white. These observations do not establish visibility sectors, full compliance or Ocean Angel’s light status.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0160", "D2P2-253" ] } }, { "id": "P2-C46", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson estimates being at least three utility-pole distances from shore.", "status": "rough distance estimate", "source": "II P2-042 / P2-U0683, P2-U0684", "source_anchor": "P2-042", "caveat": "Do not convert to metres or plot an exact collision coordinate; pole spacing is unspecified.", "exact_excerpt": "So you say free utility poles at least. It could have been more but >> could have been more", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C46", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "rough distance estimate", "statement": "Tyson estimates being at least three utility-pole distances from shore.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0683", "P2-U0684" ], "start_char": 45226, "end_char_exclusive": 45317, "exact_source_excerpt": "So you say free utility poles at least. It could have been more but >> could have been more", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Do not convert to metres or plot an exact collision coordinate; pole spacing is unspecified.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-042" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C47", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson says he put the boat in neutral immediately after impact.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-043 / P2-U0695", "source_anchor": "P2-043", "caveat": "Subsequent testimony says he entered water seconds later; initial stay phrasing need not mean he remained indefinitely.", "exact_excerpt": "As soon as f neutral one time that's it here. I sleep the same place. Put the boat in neutral and just stay the same place behind my wheel.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C47", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Tyson says he put the boat in neutral immediately after impact.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0695" ], "start_char": 46209, "end_char_exclusive": 46348, "exact_source_excerpt": "As soon as f neutral one time that's it here. I sleep the same place. Put the boat in neutral and just stay the same place behind my wheel.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Subsequent testimony says he entered water seconds later; initial stay phrasing need not mean he remained indefinitely.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-043" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C48", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson says he did not make an emergency call because people needed rescue, and claims he entered the water and saved two lives.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-043 / P2-U0709", "source_anchor": "P2-043", "caveat": "No identities of the two rescued, full rescue sequence or corroboration in Part II.", "exact_excerpt": "the minute I put the boat in neutral I'll say seconds after I fell in water and saved two lives", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C48", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Tyson says he did not make an emergency call because people needed rescue, and claims he entered the water and saved two lives.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0709" ], "start_char": 46909, "end_char_exclusive": 47004, "exact_source_excerpt": "the minute I put the boat in neutral I'll say seconds after I fell in water and saved two lives", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "No identities of the two rescued, full rescue sequence or corroboration in Part II.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-043" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Taylor and Romeon both describe Tyson swimming to them and helping them reach the Ocean Angel fragment; Edward also supports his assistance. This corroborates the rescue account without deciding collision responsibility.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0022", "D2P1-P0123", "D2P2-086" ] } }, { "id": "P2-C49", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson says he had a lookout and that the lookout saw nothing before impact.", "status": "firsthand testimony", "source": "II P2-044 / P2-U0711, P2-U0712, P2-U0713, P2-U0714, P2-U0715", "source_anchor": "P2-044", "caveat": "Lookout identity, position and account are not provided in Part II.", "exact_excerpt": "did you have a lookout on your vessel >> on which one >> on your vessel the vessel that you were captain in did you have a lookout Yeah. >> Did the lookout see anything? >> No.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C49", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "firsthand testimony", "statement": "Tyson says he had a lookout and that the lookout saw nothing before impact.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0711", "P2-U0712", "P2-U0713", "P2-U0714", "P2-U0715" ], "start_char": 47162, "end_char_exclusive": 47338, "exact_source_excerpt": "did you have a lookout on your vessel >> on which one >> on your vessel the vessel that you were captain in did you have a lookout Yeah. >> Did the lookout see anything? >> No.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Lookout identity, position and account are not provided in Part II.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-044" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Butcher/Mavado gives his own evidence on Day 2 and denies being the lookout. Chris ultimately says his lookout description was inferred from the bow seat; Lester does not know of an appointment. Pascal’s Day 1 assignment claim remains part of the record, now disputed.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P2-142", "D2P2-280", "D2P3-S106" ] } }, { "id": "P2-C50", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson accepts not notifying Vigie lighthouse and says many fishermen/water-taxi captains do not follow that practice.", "status": "admission and generalization", "source": "II P2-045 / P2-U0731", "source_anchor": "P2-045", "caveat": "His personal non-reporting is an admission; industry-wide prevalence is his generalized claim, not a measured statistic. Applicable legal reporting requirement requires separate verification.", "exact_excerpt": "No we don't we don't that one we we we don't follow that one. Definitely a lot of us don't follow that one calling VG light whatever we don't", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C50", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "admission and generalization", "statement": "Tyson accepts not notifying Vigie lighthouse and says many fishermen/water-taxi captains do not follow that practice.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0731" ], "start_char": 48972, "end_char_exclusive": 49113, "exact_source_excerpt": "No we don't we don't that one we we we don't follow that one. Definitely a lot of us don't follow that one calling VG light whatever we don't", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "His personal non-reporting is an admission; industry-wide prevalence is his generalized claim, not a measured statistic. Applicable legal reporting requirement requires separate verification.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-045" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C51", "part": "II", "speaker": "Commissioner and Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "A commissioner puts it to Tyson that he had been approached to renew his licence; Tyson does not remember such contact.", "status": "contested proposition", "source": "II P2-046 / P2-U0741", "source_anchor": "P2-046", "caveat": "No approach letter, notice or officer testimony produced in Part II; do not state reminder was proven.", "exact_excerpt": "you were approached between 2015 and 20 and July 20 sorry July 18th 2026 to renew your license and you did not", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C51", "person": "Commissioner and Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "contested proposition", "statement": "A commissioner puts it to Tyson that he had been approached to renew his licence; Tyson does not remember such contact.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0741" ], "start_char": 50190, "end_char_exclusive": 50300, "exact_source_excerpt": "you were approached between 2015 and 20 and July 20 sorry July 18th 2026 to renew your license and you did not", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "No approach letter, notice or officer testimony produced in Part II; do not state reminder was proven.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-046" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C52", "part": "II", "speaker": "Tyson Hippolit", "statement": "Tyson says he does not remember SLASPA maritime personnel or police marine unit approaching him about the expired licence.", "status": "claimed lack of recollection", "source": "II P2-050, P2-051 / P2-U0779, P2-U0780", "source_anchor": "P2-050", "caveat": "This is not proof no approach occurred or that agencies never enforced the requirement.", "exact_excerpt": "You don't remember ever being approached in 11 years about your expired license? >> Nope.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C52", "person": "Tyson Hippolit", "evidence_category": "claimed lack of recollection", "statement": "Tyson says he does not remember SLASPA maritime personnel or police marine unit approaching him about the expired licence.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0779", "P2-U0780" ], "start_char": 54811, "end_char_exclusive": 54900, "exact_source_excerpt": "You don't remember ever being approached in 11 years about your expired license? >> Nope.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "This is not proof no approach occurred or that agencies never enforced the requirement.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-050", "P2-051" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C53", "part": "II", "speaker": "Commissioner", "statement": "Commissioner says annual renewal cost was only $5 and extrapolates $55 over 11 years.", "status": "legal/fee assertion requiring verification", "source": "II P2-048 / P2-U0756", "source_anchor": "P2-048", "caveat": "No statute, fee schedule, currency, licence class or period-specific rate substantiated in Part II; verify before repeating as fact.", "exact_excerpt": "based on the provisions of the law for you it's only $5 per year.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C53", "person": "Commissioner", "evidence_category": "legal/fee assertion requiring verification", "statement": "Commissioner says annual renewal cost was only $5 and extrapolates $55 over 11 years.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0756" ], "start_char": 51898, "end_char_exclusive": 51963, "exact_source_excerpt": "based on the provisions of the law for you it's only $5 per year.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "No statute, fee schedule, currency, licence class or period-specific rate substantiated in Part II; verify before repeating as fact.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-048" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C54", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Chair says commission is gathering facts rather than prosecuting witnesses, and witnesses may be recalled.", "status": "procedural statement", "source": "II P2-051 / P2-U0784", "source_anchor": "P2-051", "caveat": "This oral explanation does not establish legal immunity, evidentiary exclusion or all statutory powers; no final liability finding in Part II.", "exact_excerpt": "We are not trying to ask you questions so that charges can be brought against you. This is not the role of this commission.", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C54", "person": "Chair", "evidence_category": "procedural statement", "statement": "Chair says commission is gathering facts rather than prosecuting witnesses, and witnesses may be recalled.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0784" ], "start_char": 56240, "end_char_exclusive": 56363, "exact_source_excerpt": "We are not trying to ask you questions so that charges can be brought against you. This is not the role of this commission.", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "This oral explanation does not establish legal immunity, evidentiary exclusion or all statutory powers; no final liability finding in Part II.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-051" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P2-C55", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "Part II ends with a 10-minute recess before the announced final witness.", "status": "procedural endpoint", "source": "II P2-051 / P2-U0784", "source_anchor": "P2-051", "caveat": "Third transcript needed; do not imply the day's evidence or inquiry was complete.", "exact_excerpt": "After this, we only have one more witness for the day, but we have to take a short recess for no more than about 10 minutes", "original": { "claim_id": "P2-C55", "person": "Chair", "evidence_category": "procedural endpoint", "statement": "Part II ends with a 10-minute recess before the announced final witness.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_II_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P2-U0784" ], "start_char": 56784, "end_char_exclusive": 56907, "exact_source_excerpt": "After this, we only have one more witness for the day, but we have to take a short recess for no more than about 10 minutes", "audio_timestamp": null, "caveat": "Third transcript needed; do not imply the day's evidence or inquiry was complete.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute explicitly; provisional testimony, not a commission finding.", "reading_block_ids": [ "P2-051" ] }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C01", "part": "III", "speaker": "Ireneius/Irenaeus Pascal", "statement": "Pascal gives sworn oral evidence, identifies as a Soufriere tour operator, and discloses hearing difficulty on his left side.", "status": "identity and sworn appearance", "source": "III P3-001, P3-002 / P3-U0011, P3-U0012, P3-U0013, P3-U0014, P3-U0015, P3-U0016, P3-U0017, P3-U0018, P3-U0019, P3-U0020, P3-U0021, P3-U0022, P3-U0023, P3-U0024", "source_anchor": "P3-001", "caveat": "First name ASR varies. This replaces earlier Parts I–II status that owner had not yet testified.", "exact_excerpt": "Your attention on that of commissioners. Mr. Pascal has indicated that he has a slight um hearing loss in >> Yeah, I have a little hearing problem to the left. So, >> so we would need to speak up just to ensure that he can hear clearly. Are you hearing me loudly and clearly? >> Yes, I do. >> Okay. Can you state your name, your address, and your occupation? >> Um, my name Ireneius Pascal from Bridge Street Sofur, and I'm a tour operator by profession. Did you on the 19th of July 2026 give a statement to the police as to what transpired on the 18th of July 2026? >> Yes, I did. >> Were you shown a copy of this statement this morning? Yes, I do. Well, um it was supposed to be four pages, but I received two pages of it, but I do have a copy >> um with all four. >> Yeah, I have a copy. >> Very well. >> Yes. And you you have read the statement and you're satisfied that it is true and correct? >> Yes, I did. >> Okay. And you wish it to be used uh by this commission?", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C01", "source_part": 3, "person": "Ireneius/Irenaeus Pascal", "evidence_category": "identity and sworn appearance", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Pascal gives sworn oral evidence, identifies as a Soufriere tour operator, and discloses hearing difficulty on his left side.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0011", "P3-U0012", "P3-U0013", "P3-U0014", "P3-U0015", "P3-U0016", "P3-U0017", "P3-U0018", "P3-U0019", "P3-U0020", "P3-U0021", "P3-U0022", "P3-U0023", "P3-U0024" ], "start_char": 439, "end_char_exclusive": 1411, "exact_source_excerpt": "Your attention on that of commissioners. Mr. Pascal has indicated that he has a slight um hearing loss in >> Yeah, I have a little hearing problem to the left. So, >> so we would need to speak up just to ensure that he can hear clearly. Are you hearing me loudly and clearly? >> Yes, I do. >> Okay. Can you state your name, your address, and your occupation? >> Um, my name Ireneius Pascal from Bridge Street Sofur, and I'm a tour operator by profession. Did you on the 19th of July 2026 give a statement to the police as to what transpired on the 18th of July 2026? >> Yes, I did. >> Were you shown a copy of this statement this morning? Yes, I do. Well, um it was supposed to be four pages, but I received two pages of it, but I do have a copy >> um with all four. >> Yeah, I have a copy. >> Very well. >> Yes. And you you have read the statement and you're satisfied that it is true and correct? >> Yes, I did. >> Okay. And you wish it to be used uh by this commission?", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-001", "P3-002" ], "caveat": "First name ASR varies. This replaces earlier Parts I–II status that owner had not yet testified.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C02", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Adopts police statement dated 19 July 2026 as true without alteration; received only two of four pages that morning but says he has all four.", "status": "adoption of police statement", "source": "III P3-001, P3-002 / P3-U0016, P3-U0017, P3-U0018, P3-U0019, P3-U0020, P3-U0021, P3-U0022, P3-U0023, P3-U0024, P3-U0025, P3-U0026, P3-U0027, P3-U0028, P3-U0029, P3-U0030, P3-U0031", "source_anchor": "P3-001", "caveat": "Do not claim he adopted only two pages or that the complete statement was read aloud.", "exact_excerpt": "Did you on the 19th of July 2026 give a statement to the police as to what transpired on the 18th of July 2026? >> Yes, I did. >> Were you shown a copy of this statement this morning? Yes, I do. Well, um it was supposed to be four pages, but I received two pages of it, but I do have a copy >> um with all four. >> Yeah, I have a copy. >> Very well. >> Yes. And you you have read the statement and you're satisfied that it is true and correct? >> Yes, I did. >> Okay. And you wish it to be used uh by this commission? >> Repeat yourself. And you wish it to be used by this commission as evidence? >> Yes. >> Having read the statement, is there anything you need to add to need you need to alter? >> No. >> You're you're satisfied with the statement as >> as read by you? >> Yes, I do.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C02", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "adoption of police statement", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Adopts police statement dated 19 July 2026 as true without alteration; received only two of four pages that morning but says he has all four.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0016", "P3-U0017", "P3-U0018", "P3-U0019", "P3-U0020", "P3-U0021", "P3-U0022", "P3-U0023", "P3-U0024", "P3-U0025", "P3-U0026", "P3-U0027", "P3-U0028", "P3-U0029", "P3-U0030", "P3-U0031" ], "start_char": 894, "end_char_exclusive": 1678, "exact_source_excerpt": "Did you on the 19th of July 2026 give a statement to the police as to what transpired on the 18th of July 2026? >> Yes, I did. >> Were you shown a copy of this statement this morning? Yes, I do. Well, um it was supposed to be four pages, but I received two pages of it, but I do have a copy >> um with all four. >> Yeah, I have a copy. >> Very well. >> Yes. And you you have read the statement and you're satisfied that it is true and correct? >> Yes, I did. >> Okay. And you wish it to be used uh by this commission? >> Repeat yourself. And you wish it to be used by this commission as evidence? >> Yes. >> Having read the statement, is there anything you need to add to need you need to alter? >> No. >> You're you're satisfied with the statement as >> as read by you? >> Yes, I do.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-001", "P3-002" ], "caveat": "Do not claim he adopted only two pages or that the complete statement was read aloud.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C03", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Identifies himself as owner of Cazorla Jr and says he has no captain licence.", "status": "identity and ownership testimony", "source": "III P3-003 / P3-U0041, P3-U0042, P3-U0043, P3-U0044, P3-U0045", "source_anchor": "P3-003", "caveat": "Ownership asserted under oath; vessel ASR Kazola. Ownership without captain licence is not itself a demonstrated offence.", "exact_excerpt": "I'm the owner of Kazola Jr. >> Mhm. Are you Do you also have a captain's license? >> Make your pardon. >> Do you also have a captain's license? >> No, I don't have.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C03", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "identity and ownership testimony", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Identifies himself as owner of Cazorla Jr and says he has no captain licence.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0041", "P3-U0042", "P3-U0043", "P3-U0044", "P3-U0045" ], "start_char": 2211, "end_char_exclusive": 2375, "exact_source_excerpt": "I'm the owner of Kazola Jr. >> Mhm. Are you Do you also have a captain's license? >> Make your pardon. >> Do you also have a captain's license? >> No, I don't have.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-003" ], "caveat": "Ownership asserted under oath; vessel ASR Kazola. Ownership without captain licence is not itself a demonstrated offence.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C04", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Regular captain unavailable after taking his own boat to the planned carnival event; Tyson, part of the social plans, operated instead.", "status": "voyage staffing testimony", "source": "III P3-003, P3-004 / P3-U0041, P3-U0042, P3-U0043, P3-U0044, P3-U0045, P3-U0046, P3-U0047, P3-U0048, P3-U0049, P3-U0050, P3-U0051, P3-U0052, P3-U0053, P3-U0054, P3-U0055, P3-U0056, P3-U0057, P3-U0058, P3-U0059, P3-U0060, P3-U0061, P3-U0062, P3-U0063, P3-U0064, P3-U0065, P3-U0066, P3-U0067, P3-U0068, P3-U0069, P3-U0070", "source_anchor": "P3-003", "caveat": "No-choice phrasing is his justification, not proof no safe alternative existed.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Owner. I'm the owner of Kazola Jr. >> Mhm. Are you Do you also have a captain's license? >> Make your pardon. >> Do you also have a captain's license? >> No, I don't have. >> And what kind of touristic boating events is your boat involved in? >> Um well, we specialize in both. um how would I say um fishing troops like London seats. >> London seats. >> Yeah, I specialize in London. I mean, >> and do you have a full-time captain? >> Yes, I do. >> Um and on the the date the 18th of July 2026, >> he wasn't available. >> He was not available. No. >> So, what arrangements did you make in his place? >> Well, I found out that it was because it was a planned event. The whole thing that happened, it was planned because, you know, Connival have a calendar of events coming, you know. So, we plan ahead and decided to go, but you know, he was supposed to be the captain, but the day of the event, he took his boat, which is a um a day, and he went out to the event on his own. So you know I had left with no choice. Um Tyson was you know among the plans as well. So he just decided to you know captain the boat on that night. >> So the captain you used on the day of the 18th of July 2026 is a captain you usually use or this was the first time? No, he's basically I've used him a few times, you know, but the day of the the event, he's not my um how would I say it? He's not my um my worker. He don't work for me. I just use him time to time. The the night of the the event, I use him. >> When you say a few times in over a season of 10 months, how often do you use his services? >> Rarely, I use him cuz he's not my captain. He's not my captain. I really use him. Like, you know, I don't really use him. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> So, on the day in question, >> were you on the vessel? >> Yes, I was. >> And as the owner, as the owner, are you aware of the process in having guests on your vessel >> or the protocol? Repeat yourself. >> The protocol. Are you aware of the protocols of having guests on your vessel during tours? >> Yes, I do. >> So, can you confirm whether safety briefings were done? >> None. None of none of safety briefings was given. Is there a reason why? ", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C04", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "voyage staffing testimony", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Regular captain unavailable after taking his own boat to the planned carnival event; Tyson, part of the social plans, operated instead.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0041", "P3-U0042", "P3-U0043", "P3-U0044", "P3-U0045", "P3-U0046", "P3-U0047", "P3-U0048", "P3-U0049", "P3-U0050", "P3-U0051", "P3-U0052", "P3-U0053", "P3-U0054", "P3-U0055", "P3-U0056", "P3-U0057", "P3-U0058", "P3-U0059", "P3-U0060", "P3-U0061", "P3-U0062", "P3-U0063", "P3-U0064", "P3-U0065", "P3-U0066", "P3-U0067", "P3-U0068", "P3-U0069", "P3-U0070" ], "start_char": 2201, "end_char_exclusive": 4374, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Owner. I'm the owner of Kazola Jr. >> Mhm. Are you Do you also have a captain's license? >> Make your pardon. >> Do you also have a captain's license? >> No, I don't have. >> And what kind of touristic boating events is your boat involved in? >> Um well, we specialize in both. um how would I say um fishing troops like London seats. >> London seats. >> Yeah, I specialize in London. I mean, >> and do you have a full-time captain? >> Yes, I do. >> Um and on the the date the 18th of July 2026, >> he wasn't available. >> He was not available. No. >> So, what arrangements did you make in his place? >> Well, I found out that it was because it was a planned event. The whole thing that happened, it was planned because, you know, Connival have a calendar of events coming, you know. So, we plan ahead and decided to go, but you know, he was supposed to be the captain, but the day of the event, he took his boat, which is a um a day, and he went out to the event on his own. So you know I had left with no choice. Um Tyson was you know among the plans as well. So he just decided to you know captain the boat on that night. >> So the captain you used on the day of the 18th of July 2026 is a captain you usually use or this was the first time? No, he's basically I've used him a few times, you know, but the day of the the event, he's not my um how would I say it? He's not my um my worker. He don't work for me. I just use him time to time. The the night of the the event, I use him. >> When you say a few times in over a season of 10 months, how often do you use his services? >> Rarely, I use him cuz he's not my captain. He's not my captain. I really use him. Like, you know, I don't really use him. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> So, on the day in question, >> were you on the vessel? >> Yes, I was. >> And as the owner, as the owner, are you aware of the process in having guests on your vessel >> or the protocol? Repeat yourself. >> The protocol. Are you aware of the protocols of having guests on your vessel during tours? >> Yes, I do. >> So, can you confirm whether safety briefings were done? >> None. None of none of safety briefings was given. Is there a reason why? ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-003", "P3-004" ], "caveat": "No-choice phrasing is his justification, not proof no safe alternative existed.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C05", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says Tyson is not his employee or regular captain but he has used him a few times.", "status": "employment and experience testimony", "source": "III P3-004 / P3-U0057, P3-U0058, P3-U0059", "source_anchor": "P3-004", "caveat": "Frequency not quantified reliably; this is not first-ever use.", "exact_excerpt": "So the captain you used on the day of the 18th of July 2026 is a captain you usually use or this was the first time? No, he's basically I've used him a few times, you know, but the day of the the event, he's not my um how would I say it? He's not my um my worker. He don't work for me. I just use him time to time. The the night of the the event, I use him. >> When you say a few times in over a season of 10 months, how often do you use his services? >> Rarely, I use him cuz he's not my captain. He's not my captain. I really use him. Like, you know, I don't really use him.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C05", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "employment and experience testimony", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says Tyson is not his employee or regular captain but he has used him a few times.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0057", "P3-U0058", "P3-U0059" ], "start_char": 3331, "end_char_exclusive": 3907, "exact_source_excerpt": "So the captain you used on the day of the 18th of July 2026 is a captain you usually use or this was the first time? No, he's basically I've used him a few times, you know, but the day of the the event, he's not my um how would I say it? He's not my um my worker. He don't work for me. I just use him time to time. The the night of the the event, I use him. >> When you say a few times in over a season of 10 months, how often do you use his services? >> Rarely, I use him cuz he's not my captain. He's not my captain. I really use him. Like, you know, I don't really use him.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-004" ], "caveat": "Frequency not quantified reliably; this is not first-ever use.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C06", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Was aboard and admits no safety briefing on this voyage.", "status": "operational admission", "source": "III P3-004, P3-005, P3-006 / P3-U0063, P3-U0064, P3-U0065, P3-U0066, P3-U0067, P3-U0068, P3-U0069, P3-U0070, P3-U0071, P3-U0072, P3-U0073, P3-U0074, P3-U0075, P3-U0076, P3-U0077, P3-U0078, P3-U0079", "source_anchor": "P3-004", "caveat": "Use a direct admission about this trip; broader practice allegations require separate attribution.", "exact_excerpt": "were you on the vessel? >> Yes, I was. >> And as the owner, as the owner, are you aware of the process in having guests on your vessel >> or the protocol? Repeat yourself. >> The protocol. Are you aware of the protocols of having guests on your vessel during tours? >> Yes, I do. >> So, can you confirm whether safety briefings were done? >> None. None of none of safety briefings was given. Is there a reason why? >> Well, I believe that's just a a weeping like we don't really, you know, take serious, you know, us. So that's why I think that's the purpose of that to, you know, reinforce those stuff and for us to do the things the right way cuz I could be honest with you. If I'm being honest with you, the majority, we don't do that. We don't brief you know especially when it's not commercial use like you know using for guests and it's locals we just do things you know so that's >> so when you have organized tours >> Mhm. >> for tourists do you do safety briefings? >> Yes. So I do cuz I'm the saleserson at the beach and I conduct everything. So basically when I go out of guests I'll tell them that live vest is mandatory especially when you're doing snorkeling. So I'd brief them accordingly and tell them what cuz also on my boat there's a big sign at the front where it's stated um live vest is mandatory as well. >> Okay. So you do safety briefings for tourists, but for localized events, >> Yeah. >> you do not have safety briefings. >> We didn't we didn't do that at all that day.", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C06", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "operational admission", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Was aboard and admits no safety briefing on this voyage.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0063", "P3-U0064", "P3-U0065", "P3-U0066", "P3-U0067", "P3-U0068", "P3-U0069", "P3-U0070", "P3-U0071", "P3-U0072", "P3-U0073", "P3-U0074", "P3-U0075", "P3-U0076", "P3-U0077", "P3-U0078", "P3-U0079" ], "start_char": 3959, "end_char_exclusive": 5456, "exact_source_excerpt": "were you on the vessel? >> Yes, I was. >> And as the owner, as the owner, are you aware of the process in having guests on your vessel >> or the protocol? Repeat yourself. >> The protocol. Are you aware of the protocols of having guests on your vessel during tours? >> Yes, I do. >> So, can you confirm whether safety briefings were done? >> None. None of none of safety briefings was given. Is there a reason why? >> Well, I believe that's just a a weeping like we don't really, you know, take serious, you know, us. So that's why I think that's the purpose of that to, you know, reinforce those stuff and for us to do the things the right way cuz I could be honest with you. If I'm being honest with you, the majority, we don't do that. We don't brief you know especially when it's not commercial use like you know using for guests and it's locals we just do things you know so that's >> so when you have organized tours >> Mhm. >> for tourists do you do safety briefings? >> Yes. So I do cuz I'm the saleserson at the beach and I conduct everything. So basically when I go out of guests I'll tell them that live vest is mandatory especially when you're doing snorkeling. So I'd brief them accordingly and tell them what cuz also on my boat there's a big sign at the front where it's stated um live vest is mandatory as well. >> Okay. So you do safety briefings for tourists, but for localized events, >> Yeah. >> you do not have safety briefings. >> We didn't we didn't do that at all that day.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-004", "P3-005", "P3-006" ], "caveat": "Use a direct admission about this trip; broader practice allegations require separate attribution.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C07", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Describes giving tourist safety briefings and having a life-vest-mandatory sign; says local trips often do not receive these practices.", "status": "claimed different safety practices", "source": "III P3-005, P3-006 / P3-U0071, P3-U0072, P3-U0073, P3-U0074, P3-U0075, P3-U0076, P3-U0077, P3-U0078, P3-U0079, P3-U0080, P3-U0081, P3-U0082, P3-U0083, P3-U0084, P3-U0085, P3-U0086, P3-U0087", "source_anchor": "P3-005", "caveat": "His generalized description is not an industry audit. Later resists examiner framing but maintains omission.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Well, I believe that's just a a weeping like we don't really, you know, take serious, you know, us. So that's why I think that's the purpose of that to, you know, reinforce those stuff and for us to do the things the right way cuz I could be honest with you. If I'm being honest with you, the majority, we don't do that. We don't brief you know especially when it's not commercial use like you know using for guests and it's locals we just do things you know so that's >> so when you have organized tours >> Mhm. >> for tourists do you do safety briefings? >> Yes. So I do cuz I'm the saleserson at the beach and I conduct everything. So basically when I go out of guests I'll tell them that live vest is mandatory especially when you're doing snorkeling. So I'd brief them accordingly and tell them what cuz also on my boat there's a big sign at the front where it's stated um live vest is mandatory as well. >> Okay. So you do safety briefings for tourists, but for localized events, >> Yeah. >> you do not have safety briefings. >> We didn't we didn't do that at all that day. >> Okay. And as the owner of the vessel, do you have a designated lookout person on your vessel? Well, yes, cuz I do have my captain and crew which work for me as well. I have a captain and crew. Well, I keep I I have a few guys who works for me as well, you know, but I have a valid captain license holder who's captain in my boat and um a crew member. Now, I'm seeing you all have some new laws in terms of having license for crew. >> I'm sorry, I didn't hear what you just said. I said there's a new protocol with having a license for crew and with that being said that you know my my guys who works for me I have two captain works for me but I don't have none of them doesn't have a a crew license. >> You have two captains working for you? >> Yeah two captains >> but none of them have >> a crew license because they have a they have a a license to captain the boat. >> Okay. So, who was the designated lookout person on the vessel >> on the night ", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_generalization", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C07", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "claimed different safety practices", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_generalization", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Describes giving tourist safety briefings and having a life-vest-mandatory sign; says local trips often do not receive these practices.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0071", "P3-U0072", "P3-U0073", "P3-U0074", "P3-U0075", "P3-U0076", "P3-U0077", "P3-U0078", "P3-U0079", "P3-U0080", "P3-U0081", "P3-U0082", "P3-U0083", "P3-U0084", "P3-U0085", "P3-U0086", "P3-U0087" ], "start_char": 4374, "end_char_exclusive": 6410, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Well, I believe that's just a a weeping like we don't really, you know, take serious, you know, us. So that's why I think that's the purpose of that to, you know, reinforce those stuff and for us to do the things the right way cuz I could be honest with you. If I'm being honest with you, the majority, we don't do that. We don't brief you know especially when it's not commercial use like you know using for guests and it's locals we just do things you know so that's >> so when you have organized tours >> Mhm. >> for tourists do you do safety briefings? >> Yes. So I do cuz I'm the saleserson at the beach and I conduct everything. So basically when I go out of guests I'll tell them that live vest is mandatory especially when you're doing snorkeling. So I'd brief them accordingly and tell them what cuz also on my boat there's a big sign at the front where it's stated um live vest is mandatory as well. >> Okay. So you do safety briefings for tourists, but for localized events, >> Yeah. >> you do not have safety briefings. >> We didn't we didn't do that at all that day. >> Okay. And as the owner of the vessel, do you have a designated lookout person on your vessel? Well, yes, cuz I do have my captain and crew which work for me as well. I have a captain and crew. Well, I keep I I have a few guys who works for me as well, you know, but I have a valid captain license holder who's captain in my boat and um a crew member. Now, I'm seeing you all have some new laws in terms of having license for crew. >> I'm sorry, I didn't hear what you just said. I said there's a new protocol with having a license for crew and with that being said that you know my my guys who works for me I have two captain works for me but I don't have none of them doesn't have a a crew license. >> You have two captains working for you? >> Yeah two captains >> but none of them have >> a crew license because they have a they have a a license to captain the boat. >> Okay. So, who was the designated lookout person on the vessel >> on the night ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-005", "P3-006" ], "caveat": "His generalized description is not an industry audit. Later resists examiner framing but maintains omission.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C08", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says he uses captains with captain licences but none has a separate crew licence; describes crew licensing as a new protocol.", "status": "licensing understanding", "source": "III P3-006 / P3-U0079, P3-U0080, P3-U0081, P3-U0082, P3-U0083, P3-U0084, P3-U0085, P3-U0086, P3-U0087", "source_anchor": "P3-006", "caveat": "No law or commencement date established by this assertion; do not describe as verified new legislation.", "exact_excerpt": ">> We didn't we didn't do that at all that day. >> Okay. And as the owner of the vessel, do you have a designated lookout person on your vessel? Well, yes, cuz I do have my captain and crew which work for me as well. I have a captain and crew. Well, I keep I I have a few guys who works for me as well, you know, but I have a valid captain license holder who's captain in my boat and um a crew member. Now, I'm seeing you all have some new laws in terms of having license for crew. >> I'm sorry, I didn't hear what you just said. I said there's a new protocol with having a license for crew and with that being said that you know my my guys who works for me I have two captain works for me but I don't have none of them doesn't have a a crew license. >> You have two captains working for you? >> Yeah two captains >> but none of them have >> a crew license because they have a they have a a license to captain the boat. >> Okay. So, who was the designated lookout person on the vessel >> on the night ", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C08", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "licensing understanding", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says he uses captains with captain licences but none has a separate crew licence; describes crew licensing as a new protocol.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0079", "P3-U0080", "P3-U0081", "P3-U0082", "P3-U0083", "P3-U0084", "P3-U0085", "P3-U0086", "P3-U0087" ], "start_char": 5409, "end_char_exclusive": 6410, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> We didn't we didn't do that at all that day. >> Okay. And as the owner of the vessel, do you have a designated lookout person on your vessel? Well, yes, cuz I do have my captain and crew which work for me as well. I have a captain and crew. Well, I keep I I have a few guys who works for me as well, you know, but I have a valid captain license holder who's captain in my boat and um a crew member. Now, I'm seeing you all have some new laws in terms of having license for crew. >> I'm sorry, I didn't hear what you just said. I said there's a new protocol with having a license for crew and with that being said that you know my my guys who works for me I have two captain works for me but I don't have none of them doesn't have a a crew license. >> You have two captains working for you? >> Yeah two captains >> but none of them have >> a crew license because they have a they have a a license to captain the boat. >> Okay. So, who was the designated lookout person on the vessel >> on the night ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-006" ], "caveat": "No law or commencement date established by this assertion; do not describe as verified new legislation.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C09", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "No designated lookout on outbound trip; a man called Mado/Mavado acted as lookout on the southbound return.", "status": "lookout admission", "source": "III P3-007 / P3-U0089, P3-U0090, P3-U0091, P3-U0092, P3-U0093, P3-U0094, P3-U0095, P3-U0096", "source_anchor": "P3-007", "caveat": "Later linked to Janelle/Jonel Butcher; do not report no lookout for the collision leg.", "exact_excerpt": "We did not um to be honest with you, I had no lookout because it was, you know, as I said, it was a day we just go and just go have fun. We never know it would happen like that. So, I didn't have a um lookout person when we were leaving. But on the way back, we had one which was one of the guys that you know follow us on the way back. >> And who was that? >> Mado. >> Yeah. His name is Jel. Jel something. Yeah. >> So Mado was the local >> person on the way back to Sufra. >> On the way head coming down from the north heading >> leaving the north to go to our destination Sufra. Mada was the person looking out on that night.", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C09", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "lookout admission", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "No designated lookout on outbound trip; a man called Mado/Mavado acted as lookout on the southbound return.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0089", "P3-U0090", "P3-U0091", "P3-U0092", "P3-U0093", "P3-U0094", "P3-U0095", "P3-U0096" ], "start_char": 6448, "end_char_exclusive": 7076, "exact_source_excerpt": "We did not um to be honest with you, I had no lookout because it was, you know, as I said, it was a day we just go and just go have fun. We never know it would happen like that. So, I didn't have a um lookout person when we were leaving. But on the way back, we had one which was one of the guys that you know follow us on the way back. >> And who was that? >> Mado. >> Yeah. His name is Jel. Jel something. Yeah. >> So Mado was the local >> person on the way back to Sufra. >> On the way head coming down from the north heading >> leaving the north to go to our destination Sufra. Mada was the person looking out on that night.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-007" ], "caveat": "Later linked to Janelle/Jonel Butcher; do not report no lookout for the collision leg.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Butcher/Mavado gives his own evidence on Day 2 and denies being the lookout. Chris ultimately says his lookout description was inferred from the bow seat; Lester does not know of an appointment. Pascal’s Day 1 assignment claim remains part of the record, now disputed.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P2-142", "D2P2-280", "D2P3-S106" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C10", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says VHF radio worked but was not used and lighthouse was not informed; clarifies lights/navigation aids worked and were used from departure.", "status": "equipment and reporting testimony", "source": "III P3-007, P3-008 / P3-U0097, P3-U0098, P3-U0099, P3-U0100, P3-U0101, P3-U0102, P3-U0103, P3-U0104, P3-U0105, P3-U0106", "source_anchor": "P3-007", "caveat": "The initial not-at-use phrase is corrected in the next answer. No independent electrical test here.", "exact_excerpt": "And the night in question, were all the systems on your vessel working? >> Um, to be honest with you, I do have my VHF radio, which wasn't been used that night. Captain didn't use it. Nobody use it. Um, I do have my live vest. I have my um fire extinguishers and my lights front and back. So the night it just wasn't at use. We didn't tell anyone like the light off to inform the light off that we were coming. None of that happened. >> So the night in question, your navigational aids on the vessel were working but not used >> properly worked and it was at use from the time we left. >> Okay. And the VHF was working. >> It was working. We didn't use >> we didn't use it. But as I said, it's not a me thing. I'm not just trying and you know, it's not a me thing. It's something I think majority of us honestly have a habit of doing like we don't really inform the light. >> Okay. >> Which we supposed to we don't do it. It's just a we thing. And I think that's the reason why you all are here to enforce on the law on doing that. So >> So you confirmed there was no safety briefings.", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_equipment_claim", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C10", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "equipment and reporting testimony", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_equipment_claim", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says VHF radio worked but was not used and lighthouse was not informed; clarifies lights/navigation aids worked and were used from departure.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0097", "P3-U0098", "P3-U0099", "P3-U0100", "P3-U0101", "P3-U0102", "P3-U0103", "P3-U0104", "P3-U0105", "P3-U0106" ], "start_char": 7080, "end_char_exclusive": 8165, "exact_source_excerpt": "And the night in question, were all the systems on your vessel working? >> Um, to be honest with you, I do have my VHF radio, which wasn't been used that night. Captain didn't use it. Nobody use it. Um, I do have my live vest. I have my um fire extinguishers and my lights front and back. So the night it just wasn't at use. We didn't tell anyone like the light off to inform the light off that we were coming. None of that happened. >> So the night in question, your navigational aids on the vessel were working but not used >> properly worked and it was at use from the time we left. >> Okay. And the VHF was working. >> It was working. We didn't use >> we didn't use it. But as I said, it's not a me thing. I'm not just trying and you know, it's not a me thing. It's something I think majority of us honestly have a habit of doing like we don't really inform the light. >> Okay. >> Which we supposed to we don't do it. It's just a we thing. And I think that's the reason why you all are here to enforce on the law on doing that. So >> So you confirmed there was no safety briefings.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-007", "P3-008" ], "caveat": "The initial not-at-use phrase is corrected in the next answer. No independent electrical test here.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 passengers add accounts of Cazorla’s illuminated lights; Chris describes red, green and white. These observations do not establish visibility sectors, full compliance or Ocean Angel’s light status.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0160", "D2P2-253" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C11", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says jackets were not generally issued, but Roman William requested one roughly ten minutes before the collision.", "status": "life-jacket practice and survivor account", "source": "III P3-008 / P3-U0108, P3-U0109", "source_anchor": "P3-008", "caveat": "Later says girlfriend Taylor requested it; his suggestion Roman might otherwise have died is counterfactual, not evidence Roman died.", "exact_excerpt": "Are you aware whether or not life jackets were issued on that night? >> And I'm being honest with you. As I said, no live vest were issued at the time, but one individual asked for a live vest minutes before the collision. And I don't even know what led him to ask for that live at that time because I'm going to be honest, he would be one of the persons being un alive. He asked for the live vest 10 minutes before the collision. And that's Mr. Roman. Mr. Roman William.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C11", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "life-jacket practice and survivor account", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says jackets were not generally issued, but Roman William requested one roughly ten minutes before the collision.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0108", "P3-U0109" ], "start_char": 8192, "end_char_exclusive": 8663, "exact_source_excerpt": "Are you aware whether or not life jackets were issued on that night? >> And I'm being honest with you. As I said, no live vest were issued at the time, but one individual asked for a live vest minutes before the collision. And I don't even know what led him to ask for that live at that time because I'm going to be honest, he would be one of the persons being un alive. He asked for the live vest 10 minutes before the collision. And that's Mr. Roman. Mr. Roman William.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-008" ], "caveat": "Later says girlfriend Taylor requested it; his suggestion Roman might otherwise have died is counterfactual, not evidence Roman died.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 identifies the wearer as Romeon Williams. Taylor and Romeon describe her relaying the request and helping him put it on. Their approximately 2–5/about 5 minute interval differs from Pascal’s estimate. Later claims about a girl wearing it are qualified as assumption.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0119", "D2P1-P0156", "D2P2-191" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C12", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "No flares were aboard that night.", "status": "safety-equipment admission", "source": "III P3-009 / P3-U0114, P3-U0115", "source_anchor": "P3-009", "caveat": "Different from Ocean Angel claim of inaccessible flares; keep boats separate.", "exact_excerpt": "among the safety equipment. Is do you have a any a flare gun and flares? >> Um being honest um the night we didn't have any flares on board.", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C12", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "safety-equipment admission", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "No flares were aboard that night.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0114", "P3-U0115" ], "start_char": 9103, "end_char_exclusive": 9243, "exact_source_excerpt": "among the safety equipment. Is do you have a any a flare gun and flares? >> Um being honest um the night we didn't have any flares on board.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-009" ], "caveat": "Different from Ocean Angel claim of inaccessible flares; keep boats separate.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C13", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says he checks forecasts for tourist tours but did not do so for this local outing.", "status": "weather-check admission", "source": "III P3-009, P3-010 / P3-U0115, P3-U0116, P3-U0117, P3-U0118, P3-U0119, P3-U0120", "source_anchor": "P3-009", "caveat": "Relate to official regional advisory without claiming its forecast was measured at impact.", "exact_excerpt": "In terms of standard oper operating procedures, do you normally review the marine or the weather forecast before you venture out on your vessel? >> Repeat yourself. >> As part of your SOPs, your standard operating procedures. >> Mhm. Do you normally get a copy of the marine or weather report before your vessel ventures out? >> Well, um, again for my guest, I always check weather forecast because sometimes it could affect it could affect my tours as well. So, I just look out for that. But I didn't look out when we have locals. I don't I don't really do that. >> So, do you consider locals your guests? Well, we it wasn't as I said if um if I'm operating commotionally commercially I'll say yes they're my guest but you know in that event but we heading out to a party I wouldn't say they are guest", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C13", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "weather-check admission", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says he checks forecasts for tourist tours but did not do so for this local outing.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0115", "P3-U0116", "P3-U0117", "P3-U0118", "P3-U0119", "P3-U0120" ], "start_char": 9244, "end_char_exclusive": 10046, "exact_source_excerpt": "In terms of standard oper operating procedures, do you normally review the marine or the weather forecast before you venture out on your vessel? >> Repeat yourself. >> As part of your SOPs, your standard operating procedures. >> Mhm. Do you normally get a copy of the marine or weather report before your vessel ventures out? >> Well, um, again for my guest, I always check weather forecast because sometimes it could affect it could affect my tours as well. So, I just look out for that. But I didn't look out when we have locals. I don't I don't really do that. >> So, do you consider locals your guests? Well, we it wasn't as I said if um if I'm operating commotionally commercially I'll say yes they're my guest but you know in that event but we heading out to a party I wouldn't say they are guest", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-009", "P3-010" ], "caveat": "Relate to official regional advisory without claiming its forecast was measured at impact.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Describes dark clouds and choppy seas; says he asked Tyson to slow because he was going more than moderate speed and waves posed danger.", "status": "sea/weather and speed account", "source": "III P3-010, P3-011 / P3-U0120, P3-U0121, P3-U0122, P3-U0123, P3-U0124, P3-U0125, P3-U0126, P3-U0127, P3-U0128, P3-U0129, P3-U0130, P3-U0131, P3-U0132", "source_anchor": "P3-010", "caveat": "No numerical speed or measured sea state; owner observation, not collision-causation finding.", "exact_excerpt": ">> So, do you consider locals your guests? Well, we it wasn't as I said if um if I'm operating commotionally commercially I'll say yes they're my guest but you know in that event but we heading out to a party I wouldn't say they are guest >> so what was the weather like that night that day and night >> well day in the day it was good um well the sea was kind of choppy >> Mhm. In the day, the weather was okay in the day, but the night it was kind of dark, you know, some dark clouds, you know. Um, also she was choppy. And at one point, I'm being honest cuz it's only the trophy. All right. when we were leaving um Rodney or Gile um captain was you know going a little more than moderate all right and I had to stop him and I have people that could attest to that I had to tell him that you know take it easy because it's kind of choppy and you can't ride those wave with speed cuz you know it could we have nine of us on board it could cause you know even without coll co colliding with anybody body it could just sink sometime take a wave so I had to call on on him and tell him you know he has to take it easy >> and who was the captain at the time >> it was Tyson Tyson captain go and come back >> and that's Tyson Hippolith >> Tyson Hippolith yeah >> during the course of that evening did you consume any alcoholic beverages >> yes I did yes I and I could clearly remember what I was consuming that night. >> And did you consume any alcohol with your captain? >> No. Well, I was the one who I purchased as I said clearly in my statement that I purchase um like three four bears for each of them cuz you know when I go out I always you know take care I I I'm the one who spending you know so you know everything was on me. So, I bought like three or four rounds of drinks which was bez. And I had like a glass like glass of um I think it was Bonte and Cranberry that night. Yeah, Bonte and Cranberry I had that night. I only had maybe three four glass. I not a heavy drinker. I drink occasionally. But it's normal if you go out with your captains while on a tour that you buy drinks for them. >> They go pardon. ", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C14", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "sea/weather and speed account", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Describes dark clouds and choppy seas; says he asked Tyson to slow because he was going more than moderate speed and waves posed danger.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0120", "P3-U0121", "P3-U0122", "P3-U0123", "P3-U0124", "P3-U0125", "P3-U0126", "P3-U0127", "P3-U0128", "P3-U0129", "P3-U0130", "P3-U0131", "P3-U0132" ], "start_char": 9808, "end_char_exclusive": 11927, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> So, do you consider locals your guests? Well, we it wasn't as I said if um if I'm operating commotionally commercially I'll say yes they're my guest but you know in that event but we heading out to a party I wouldn't say they are guest >> so what was the weather like that night that day and night >> well day in the day it was good um well the sea was kind of choppy >> Mhm. In the day, the weather was okay in the day, but the night it was kind of dark, you know, some dark clouds, you know. Um, also she was choppy. And at one point, I'm being honest cuz it's only the trophy. All right. when we were leaving um Rodney or Gile um captain was you know going a little more than moderate all right and I had to stop him and I have people that could attest to that I had to tell him that you know take it easy because it's kind of choppy and you can't ride those wave with speed cuz you know it could we have nine of us on board it could cause you know even without coll co colliding with anybody body it could just sink sometime take a wave so I had to call on on him and tell him you know he has to take it easy >> and who was the captain at the time >> it was Tyson Tyson captain go and come back >> and that's Tyson Hippolith >> Tyson Hippolith yeah >> during the course of that evening did you consume any alcoholic beverages >> yes I did yes I and I could clearly remember what I was consuming that night. >> And did you consume any alcohol with your captain? >> No. Well, I was the one who I purchased as I said clearly in my statement that I purchase um like three four bears for each of them cuz you know when I go out I always you know take care I I I'm the one who spending you know so you know everything was on me. So, I bought like three or four rounds of drinks which was bez. And I had like a glass like glass of um I think it was Bonte and Cranberry that night. Yeah, Bonte and Cranberry I had that night. I only had maybe three four glass. I not a heavy drinker. I drink occasionally. But it's normal if you go out with your captains while on a tour that you buy drinks for them. >> They go pardon. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-010", "P3-011" ], "caveat": "No numerical speed or measured sea state; owner observation, not collision-causation finding.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C15", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says he bought three or four rounds of beers for companions and himself had about three or four Bounty-and-cranberry drinks, brand transcription uncertain.", "status": "alcohol purchase and consumption admission", "source": "III P3-011, P3-012 / P3-U0124, P3-U0125, P3-U0126, P3-U0127, P3-U0128, P3-U0129, P3-U0130, P3-U0131, P3-U0132, P3-U0133, P3-U0134, P3-U0135, P3-U0136, P3-U0137, P3-U0138, P3-U0139, P3-U0140, P3-U0141", "source_anchor": "P3-011", "caveat": "No drink size, strength or timing; no impairment established. Do not confuse his drinks with Tyson's beers.", "exact_excerpt": ">> and who was the captain at the time >> it was Tyson Tyson captain go and come back >> and that's Tyson Hippolith >> Tyson Hippolith yeah >> during the course of that evening did you consume any alcoholic beverages >> yes I did yes I and I could clearly remember what I was consuming that night. >> And did you consume any alcohol with your captain? >> No. Well, I was the one who I purchased as I said clearly in my statement that I purchase um like three four bears for each of them cuz you know when I go out I always you know take care I I I'm the one who spending you know so you know everything was on me. So, I bought like three or four rounds of drinks which was bez. And I had like a glass like glass of um I think it was Bonte and Cranberry that night. Yeah, Bonte and Cranberry I had that night. I only had maybe three four glass. I not a heavy drinker. I drink occasionally. But it's normal if you go out with your captains while on a tour that you buy drinks for them. >> They go pardon. >> I said, is it normal >> when you go out on tours with your captain that you buy alcoholic beverages for them? >> No, not all the time. There's a place and time for all that. As I said, that night it was a event. We went to a event and we went and, you know, have a good time. But in still having a good time, I was vigilant because as I said, I I was the one buying the drinks. So, you know, I we didn't consume too many cuz I know what it could do when you're drinking and driving. >> So, I just have two more questions. Um, >> no problem. >> Is it normal for you to extend these services during the festive season, for example, carnival, jazz, etc. Do you normally do these tours at night? >> Yes, I do. >> And how late do you stay on the water? >> Well, to be honest, as I say, I'm the owner, so I basically don't really navigate at night. I usually send my captain and crew to do the work and I just stay back. So, I don't really navigate at night. So what's the normal time they would stay out extending these services into the night or early morning? ", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C15", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "alcohol purchase and consumption admission", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says he bought three or four rounds of beers for companions and himself had about three or four Bounty-and-cranberry drinks, brand transcription uncertain.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0124", "P3-U0125", "P3-U0126", "P3-U0127", "P3-U0128", "P3-U0129", "P3-U0130", "P3-U0131", "P3-U0132", "P3-U0133", "P3-U0134", "P3-U0135", "P3-U0136", "P3-U0137", "P3-U0138", "P3-U0139", "P3-U0140", "P3-U0141" ], "start_char": 10924, "end_char_exclusive": 12987, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> and who was the captain at the time >> it was Tyson Tyson captain go and come back >> and that's Tyson Hippolith >> Tyson Hippolith yeah >> during the course of that evening did you consume any alcoholic beverages >> yes I did yes I and I could clearly remember what I was consuming that night. >> And did you consume any alcohol with your captain? >> No. Well, I was the one who I purchased as I said clearly in my statement that I purchase um like three four bears for each of them cuz you know when I go out I always you know take care I I I'm the one who spending you know so you know everything was on me. So, I bought like three or four rounds of drinks which was bez. And I had like a glass like glass of um I think it was Bonte and Cranberry that night. Yeah, Bonte and Cranberry I had that night. I only had maybe three four glass. I not a heavy drinker. I drink occasionally. But it's normal if you go out with your captains while on a tour that you buy drinks for them. >> They go pardon. >> I said, is it normal >> when you go out on tours with your captain that you buy alcoholic beverages for them? >> No, not all the time. There's a place and time for all that. As I said, that night it was a event. We went to a event and we went and, you know, have a good time. But in still having a good time, I was vigilant because as I said, I I was the one buying the drinks. So, you know, I we didn't consume too many cuz I know what it could do when you're drinking and driving. >> So, I just have two more questions. Um, >> no problem. >> Is it normal for you to extend these services during the festive season, for example, carnival, jazz, etc. Do you normally do these tours at night? >> Yes, I do. >> And how late do you stay on the water? >> Well, to be honest, as I say, I'm the owner, so I basically don't really navigate at night. I usually send my captain and crew to do the work and I just stay back. So, I don't really navigate at night. So what's the normal time they would stay out extending these services into the night or early morning? ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-011", "P3-012" ], "caveat": "No drink size, strength or timing; no impairment established. Do not confuse his drinks with Tyson's beers.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C16", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Business provides festival night services sometimes until 2–3 a.m.; owner usually sends captain and crew rather than accompanying them.", "status": "general night-service practice", "source": "III P3-012, P3-013 / P3-U0133, P3-U0134, P3-U0135, P3-U0136, P3-U0137, P3-U0138, P3-U0139, P3-U0140, P3-U0141, P3-U0142, P3-U0143, P3-U0144, P3-U0145, P3-U0146, P3-U0147, P3-U0148, P3-U0149, P3-U0150, P3-U0151, P3-U0152", "source_anchor": "P3-012", "caveat": "General practice, not an exact return time for this voyage.", "exact_excerpt": ">> I said, is it normal >> when you go out on tours with your captain that you buy alcoholic beverages for them? >> No, not all the time. There's a place and time for all that. As I said, that night it was a event. We went to a event and we went and, you know, have a good time. But in still having a good time, I was vigilant because as I said, I I was the one buying the drinks. So, you know, I we didn't consume too many cuz I know what it could do when you're drinking and driving. >> So, I just have two more questions. Um, >> no problem. >> Is it normal for you to extend these services during the festive season, for example, carnival, jazz, etc. Do you normally do these tours at night? >> Yes, I do. >> And how late do you stay on the water? >> Well, to be honest, as I say, I'm the owner, so I basically don't really navigate at night. I usually send my captain and crew to do the work and I just stay back. So, I don't really navigate at night. So what's the normal time they would stay out extending these services into the night or early morning? >> Well, it depend on what time the events done. >> Yeah. So 2 3 4 in the morning. >> 2 in the morning. Sometime most events is 2:00 in the morning, you know, 3:00 in the morning, you know, it depend. And what's the frequency of you being stopped underwater by SLASPA or the marine police when engaging in these services? >> Um, I've never encountered any anyone never encountered any stops from the marine police when doing those. >> So they've never stopped you on the water and asked for license. No, I think I've stopped maybe once cuz you know I do things as I should. So I don't think you know I've been stopped of more than once or twice. >> Sure. >> Just a minute. Not more than once or twice in two weeks or in 2 years or or 20 years? >> Take a pattern. >> When you say you've been stopped not more than once or twice, >> is that once or twice in a week? once or twice in a year once or twice every five years. >> If my business has been in operation like the boat business has been in operation for like four or five years, I'll definitely see maybe not four or five years maybe twice I've been stopped or once. I don't get myself in problem with the police. I do what I have to do in short on time, service on time. I do what I have to do on time. And anybody who knows me could attest to, you know, me taking care of my business. ", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C16", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "general night-service practice", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Business provides festival night services sometimes until 2–3 a.m.; owner usually sends captain and crew rather than accompanying them.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0133", "P3-U0134", "P3-U0135", "P3-U0136", "P3-U0137", "P3-U0138", "P3-U0139", "P3-U0140", "P3-U0141", "P3-U0142", "P3-U0143", "P3-U0144", "P3-U0145", "P3-U0146", "P3-U0147", "P3-U0148", "P3-U0149", "P3-U0150", "P3-U0151", "P3-U0152" ], "start_char": 11927, "end_char_exclusive": 14329, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> I said, is it normal >> when you go out on tours with your captain that you buy alcoholic beverages for them? >> No, not all the time. There's a place and time for all that. As I said, that night it was a event. We went to a event and we went and, you know, have a good time. But in still having a good time, I was vigilant because as I said, I I was the one buying the drinks. So, you know, I we didn't consume too many cuz I know what it could do when you're drinking and driving. >> So, I just have two more questions. Um, >> no problem. >> Is it normal for you to extend these services during the festive season, for example, carnival, jazz, etc. Do you normally do these tours at night? >> Yes, I do. >> And how late do you stay on the water? >> Well, to be honest, as I say, I'm the owner, so I basically don't really navigate at night. I usually send my captain and crew to do the work and I just stay back. So, I don't really navigate at night. So what's the normal time they would stay out extending these services into the night or early morning? >> Well, it depend on what time the events done. >> Yeah. So 2 3 4 in the morning. >> 2 in the morning. Sometime most events is 2:00 in the morning, you know, 3:00 in the morning, you know, it depend. And what's the frequency of you being stopped underwater by SLASPA or the marine police when engaging in these services? >> Um, I've never encountered any anyone never encountered any stops from the marine police when doing those. >> So they've never stopped you on the water and asked for license. No, I think I've stopped maybe once cuz you know I do things as I should. So I don't think you know I've been stopped of more than once or twice. >> Sure. >> Just a minute. Not more than once or twice in two weeks or in 2 years or or 20 years? >> Take a pattern. >> When you say you've been stopped not more than once or twice, >> is that once or twice in a week? once or twice in a year once or twice every five years. >> If my business has been in operation like the boat business has been in operation for like four or five years, I'll definitely see maybe not four or five years maybe twice I've been stopped or once. I don't get myself in problem with the police. I do what I have to do in short on time, service on time. I do what I have to do on time. And anybody who knows me could attest to, you know, me taking care of my business. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-012", "P3-013" ], "caveat": "General practice, not an exact return time for this voyage.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C17", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Initially says never stopped, then estimates once or twice during four or five years of boating business.", "status": "enforcement-contact recollection", "source": "III P3-013 / P3-U0142, P3-U0143, P3-U0144, P3-U0145, P3-U0146, P3-U0147, P3-U0148, P3-U0149, P3-U0150, P3-U0151, P3-U0152", "source_anchor": "P3-013", "caveat": "Corrected rough recollection; not documented inspection frequency or evidence zero enforcement.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Well, it depend on what time the events done. >> Yeah. So 2 3 4 in the morning. >> 2 in the morning. Sometime most events is 2:00 in the morning, you know, 3:00 in the morning, you know, it depend. And what's the frequency of you being stopped underwater by SLASPA or the marine police when engaging in these services? >> Um, I've never encountered any anyone never encountered any stops from the marine police when doing those. >> So they've never stopped you on the water and asked for license. No, I think I've stopped maybe once cuz you know I do things as I should. So I don't think you know I've been stopped of more than once or twice. >> Sure. >> Just a minute. Not more than once or twice in two weeks or in 2 years or or 20 years? >> Take a pattern. >> When you say you've been stopped not more than once or twice, >> is that once or twice in a week? once or twice in a year once or twice every five years. >> If my business has been in operation like the boat business has been in operation for like four or five years, I'll definitely see maybe not four or five years maybe twice I've been stopped or once. I don't get myself in problem with the police. I do what I have to do in short on time, service on time. I do what I have to do on time. And anybody who knows me could attest to, you know, me taking care of my business. ", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C17", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "enforcement-contact recollection", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Initially says never stopped, then estimates once or twice during four or five years of boating business.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0142", "P3-U0143", "P3-U0144", "P3-U0145", "P3-U0146", "P3-U0147", "P3-U0148", "P3-U0149", "P3-U0150", "P3-U0151", "P3-U0152" ], "start_char": 12987, "end_char_exclusive": 14329, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Well, it depend on what time the events done. >> Yeah. So 2 3 4 in the morning. >> 2 in the morning. Sometime most events is 2:00 in the morning, you know, 3:00 in the morning, you know, it depend. And what's the frequency of you being stopped underwater by SLASPA or the marine police when engaging in these services? >> Um, I've never encountered any anyone never encountered any stops from the marine police when doing those. >> So they've never stopped you on the water and asked for license. No, I think I've stopped maybe once cuz you know I do things as I should. So I don't think you know I've been stopped of more than once or twice. >> Sure. >> Just a minute. Not more than once or twice in two weeks or in 2 years or or 20 years? >> Take a pattern. >> When you say you've been stopped not more than once or twice, >> is that once or twice in a week? once or twice in a year once or twice every five years. >> If my business has been in operation like the boat business has been in operation for like four or five years, I'll definitely see maybe not four or five years maybe twice I've been stopped or once. I don't get myself in problem with the police. I do what I have to do in short on time, service on time. I do what I have to do on time. And anybody who knows me could attest to, you know, me taking care of my business. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-013" ], "caveat": "Corrected rough recollection; not documented inspection frequency or evidence zero enforcement.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C18", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "From his seat saw dark clouds, shore lights and choppy water, with limited visibility.", "status": "personal visibility account", "source": "III P3-014 / P3-U0153, P3-U0154, P3-U0155, P3-U0156, P3-U0157, P3-U0158, P3-U0159, P3-U0160, P3-U0161, P3-U0162, P3-U0163, P3-U0164, P3-U0165, P3-U0166, P3-U0167", "source_anchor": "P3-014", "caveat": "His position and hearing impairment constrain perception; does not measure captain's or lookout's sightline.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Okay. >> Yeah. >> And the final question from me, can you just summarize briefly the series of events right before the incident? Um >> what you remember in terms of visual in terms of visibility? >> Oh, the night of the event. >> Yeah. The of the incident. >> The day of the incident. >> Yeah. >> Like you mean like um visibility wise? >> Yes. >> Well, as I said, it was dark to be honest with you. And where I was seated, you know, I could have just seen dark clouds and like um how you call that lights from the shoreline and choppy like see was choppy but visibility wise like it was kind of dark. So it was dark but it was you could have still see a bit a little bit visible as well but >> the weather was dark. >> Yeah. Low visibility. >> Yeah. >> A bit of shoreline. And then what happened in terms of the impact? Just describe your Well, the impact to be honest. As I said, I've I can have a little hearing problem. So, I only heard a sound. I don't know how loud it was cuz you know when you have a little air problem you might not hear it as normal as the next person but I just heard a noise and then you know I was shift to other seat and that was it. ", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C18", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "personal visibility account", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "From his seat saw dark clouds, shore lights and choppy water, with limited visibility.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0153", "P3-U0154", "P3-U0155", "P3-U0156", "P3-U0157", "P3-U0158", "P3-U0159", "P3-U0160", "P3-U0161", "P3-U0162", "P3-U0163", "P3-U0164", "P3-U0165", "P3-U0166", "P3-U0167" ], "start_char": 14329, "end_char_exclusive": 15495, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Okay. >> Yeah. >> And the final question from me, can you just summarize briefly the series of events right before the incident? Um >> what you remember in terms of visual in terms of visibility? >> Oh, the night of the event. >> Yeah. The of the incident. >> The day of the incident. >> Yeah. >> Like you mean like um visibility wise? >> Yes. >> Well, as I said, it was dark to be honest with you. And where I was seated, you know, I could have just seen dark clouds and like um how you call that lights from the shoreline and choppy like see was choppy but visibility wise like it was kind of dark. So it was dark but it was you could have still see a bit a little bit visible as well but >> the weather was dark. >> Yeah. Low visibility. >> Yeah. >> A bit of shoreline. And then what happened in terms of the impact? Just describe your Well, the impact to be honest. As I said, I've I can have a little hearing problem. So, I only heard a sound. I don't know how loud it was cuz you know when you have a little air problem you might not hear it as normal as the next person but I just heard a noise and then you know I was shift to other seat and that was it. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-014" ], "caveat": "His position and hearing impairment constrain perception; does not measure captain's or lookout's sightline.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C19", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Assumed Tyson licensed from his known boating history; made no licence check.", "status": "operator-licence checking admission", "source": "III P3-015, P3-016, P3-017, P3-018 / P3-U0172, P3-U0173, P3-U0174, P3-U0175, P3-U0176, P3-U0177, P3-U0178, P3-U0179, P3-U0180, P3-U0181, P3-U0182, P3-U0183, P3-U0184, P3-U0185, P3-U0186, P3-U0187, P3-U0188, P3-U0189, P3-U0190, P3-U0191, P3-U0192, P3-U0193, P3-U0194, P3-U0195", "source_anchor": "P3-015", "caveat": "Says he did not know licence had expired. Do not transform this into admission of knowingly employing an expired-license operator.", "exact_excerpt": "But were you aware of the fact that you were employing somebody to to captain a boat who whose license expired 11 years ago? >> But I'm being honest with you. I know this guy for a while and I know he's been driving boats. So I'm making assumption that he has a license. You understand? And as I said the night it wasn't him was supposed to drive my boat. So you're saying you know he drives boats. Does Can I take that? You mean you know he drives passenger boats for >> No, his boat. He has his boat and I know him for I know Tyson from Donkeers cuz we stay in the same area. >> So I know him driving. >> He a fishing boat or a passenger boat? >> Oh, >> he has a fishing boat or a passenger boat? >> He has a fishing boat presently. I don't know how long he has it for but before the passion before his boat I know him to captain like um Exodus I don't know if you know about those company um Exodus that's for Tom and them >> that's back then like years maybe have decades >> that's before 2015 when he was >> well I don't I to be honest with you I don't know I as I said I just know him to captain those boats which I know is licensed boats that operate in the tourist industry so I'm assuming He do has a license. >> So I'm trying to understand you you know him to be regularly captaining these um passenger boats. You know him to be regularly captaining these boats. Why you thought he must have a license? >> Repeat yourself. >> You know is it that you're saying that he know you know he regularly captaining these passenger boats and therefore you thought he had a license? >> Yes. And how regularly would you say he captains boats? >> Well, as I said, that's don't care. That's like decades ago. But presently, as he owns his boat, I could attest that I haven't seen him drive a boat apart from his boat. That's what I could say. I haven't seen if he does it. Maybe at the moment, I didn't see. But I'm telling you, apart from his boat, cuz he drive his boat, he has his fishing boat where he go to sea. And I could see that, you know, apart from his boat, I haven't seen him drive any other boat to be honest with you. >> Yet you put him in charge of carrying nine passengers on your boat. >> Yeah. >> Cuz as I said, I know him to be driving boats. >> Yeah. what you said since he had his fishing boat, you hardly see driving boat. >> The guy's a guy's, as I said, the guy is well known for driving boats. I've known him for decades. As I said, he's drive boats bigger than what I gave him. So, he's more than capable than bringing those passengers cuz he's he drive boats bigger than my boat. Double engine, center console. >> Yeah. But for 11 years he was doing so without the legal authorization to do so. And you have engaged him without him having the legal authorization to be engaged in what you engaged him to do. Well, I wasn't a That's what I'm saying. I wasn't aware cuz he's not my captain. He's not my personal captain. I don't use him. I don't use him. As I tell you, the night it just happened that the other guy took his boat and went to the event. So I left with no choice and then we use him. He went. He's not my captain. >> And it never occurred to you to find out whether he's licensed to be on the water driving a boat like that. Never occurred to you to to do any checks or to inquire whether he's licensed to do what you were asking him to do. >> I've never made any check on whether he can do it. But from my knowledge, what I've seen, I gave him the benefit of the doubt that I know he can. So, as I said, that's what happened the night. And yeah,", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C19", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "operator-licence checking admission", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Assumed Tyson licensed from his known boating history; made no licence check.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0172", "P3-U0173", "P3-U0174", "P3-U0175", "P3-U0176", "P3-U0177", "P3-U0178", "P3-U0179", "P3-U0180", "P3-U0181", "P3-U0182", "P3-U0183", "P3-U0184", "P3-U0185", "P3-U0186", "P3-U0187", "P3-U0188", "P3-U0189", "P3-U0190", "P3-U0191", "P3-U0192", "P3-U0193", "P3-U0194", "P3-U0195" ], "start_char": 16077, "end_char_exclusive": 19660, "exact_source_excerpt": "But were you aware of the fact that you were employing somebody to to captain a boat who whose license expired 11 years ago? >> But I'm being honest with you. I know this guy for a while and I know he's been driving boats. So I'm making assumption that he has a license. You understand? And as I said the night it wasn't him was supposed to drive my boat. So you're saying you know he drives boats. Does Can I take that? You mean you know he drives passenger boats for >> No, his boat. He has his boat and I know him for I know Tyson from Donkeers cuz we stay in the same area. >> So I know him driving. >> He a fishing boat or a passenger boat? >> Oh, >> he has a fishing boat or a passenger boat? >> He has a fishing boat presently. I don't know how long he has it for but before the passion before his boat I know him to captain like um Exodus I don't know if you know about those company um Exodus that's for Tom and them >> that's back then like years maybe have decades >> that's before 2015 when he was >> well I don't I to be honest with you I don't know I as I said I just know him to captain those boats which I know is licensed boats that operate in the tourist industry so I'm assuming He do has a license. >> So I'm trying to understand you you know him to be regularly captaining these um passenger boats. You know him to be regularly captaining these boats. Why you thought he must have a license? >> Repeat yourself. >> You know is it that you're saying that he know you know he regularly captaining these passenger boats and therefore you thought he had a license? >> Yes. And how regularly would you say he captains boats? >> Well, as I said, that's don't care. That's like decades ago. But presently, as he owns his boat, I could attest that I haven't seen him drive a boat apart from his boat. That's what I could say. I haven't seen if he does it. Maybe at the moment, I didn't see. But I'm telling you, apart from his boat, cuz he drive his boat, he has his fishing boat where he go to sea. And I could see that, you know, apart from his boat, I haven't seen him drive any other boat to be honest with you. >> Yet you put him in charge of carrying nine passengers on your boat. >> Yeah. >> Cuz as I said, I know him to be driving boats. >> Yeah. what you said since he had his fishing boat, you hardly see driving boat. >> The guy's a guy's, as I said, the guy is well known for driving boats. I've known him for decades. As I said, he's drive boats bigger than what I gave him. So, he's more than capable than bringing those passengers cuz he's he drive boats bigger than my boat. Double engine, center console. >> Yeah. But for 11 years he was doing so without the legal authorization to do so. And you have engaged him without him having the legal authorization to be engaged in what you engaged him to do. Well, I wasn't a That's what I'm saying. I wasn't aware cuz he's not my captain. He's not my personal captain. I don't use him. I don't use him. As I tell you, the night it just happened that the other guy took his boat and went to the event. So I left with no choice and then we use him. He went. He's not my captain. >> And it never occurred to you to find out whether he's licensed to be on the water driving a boat like that. Never occurred to you to to do any checks or to inquire whether he's licensed to do what you were asking him to do. >> I've never made any check on whether he can do it. But from my knowledge, what I've seen, I gave him the benefit of the doubt that I know he can. So, as I said, that's what happened the night. And yeah,", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-015", "P3-016", "P3-017", "P3-018" ], "caveat": "Says he did not know licence had expired. Do not transform this into admission of knowingly employing an expired-license operator.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C20", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Recalls Tyson operating Exodus vessels long ago, but recently personally observed him mainly on his own fishing boat.", "status": "recalled operator experience", "source": "III P3-016, P3-017 / P3-U0174, P3-U0175, P3-U0176, P3-U0177, P3-U0178, P3-U0179, P3-U0180, P3-U0181, P3-U0182, P3-U0183, P3-U0184, P3-U0185, P3-U0186, P3-U0187, P3-U0188, P3-U0189, P3-U0190, P3-U0191, P3-U0192", "source_anchor": "P3-016", "caveat": "Unverified historical experience and commercial company connection; not proof of continuous eleven-year passenger operation.", "exact_excerpt": ">> No, his boat. He has his boat and I know him for I know Tyson from Donkeers cuz we stay in the same area. >> So I know him driving. >> He a fishing boat or a passenger boat? >> Oh, >> he has a fishing boat or a passenger boat? >> He has a fishing boat presently. I don't know how long he has it for but before the passion before his boat I know him to captain like um Exodus I don't know if you know about those company um Exodus that's for Tom and them >> that's back then like years maybe have decades >> that's before 2015 when he was >> well I don't I to be honest with you I don't know I as I said I just know him to captain those boats which I know is licensed boats that operate in the tourist industry so I'm assuming He do has a license. >> So I'm trying to understand you you know him to be regularly captaining these um passenger boats. You know him to be regularly captaining these boats. Why you thought he must have a license? >> Repeat yourself. >> You know is it that you're saying that he know you know he regularly captaining these passenger boats and therefore you thought he had a license? >> Yes. And how regularly would you say he captains boats? >> Well, as I said, that's don't care. That's like decades ago. But presently, as he owns his boat, I could attest that I haven't seen him drive a boat apart from his boat. That's what I could say. I haven't seen if he does it. Maybe at the moment, I didn't see. But I'm telling you, apart from his boat, cuz he drive his boat, he has his fishing boat where he go to sea. And I could see that, you know, apart from his boat, I haven't seen him drive any other boat to be honest with you. >> Yet you put him in charge of carrying nine passengers on your boat. >> Yeah. >> Cuz as I said, I know him to be driving boats. >> Yeah. what you said since he had his fishing boat, you hardly see driving boat. >> The guy's a guy's, as I said, the guy is well known for driving boats. I've known him for decades. As I said, he's drive boats bigger than what I gave him. So, he's more than capable than bringing those passengers cuz he's he drive boats bigger than my boat. Double engine, center console. ", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C20", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "recalled operator experience", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Recalls Tyson operating Exodus vessels long ago, but recently personally observed him mainly on his own fishing boat.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0174", "P3-U0175", "P3-U0176", "P3-U0177", "P3-U0178", "P3-U0179", "P3-U0180", "P3-U0181", "P3-U0182", "P3-U0183", "P3-U0184", "P3-U0185", "P3-U0186", "P3-U0187", "P3-U0188", "P3-U0189", "P3-U0190", "P3-U0191", "P3-U0192" ], "start_char": 16546, "end_char_exclusive": 18712, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> No, his boat. He has his boat and I know him for I know Tyson from Donkeers cuz we stay in the same area. >> So I know him driving. >> He a fishing boat or a passenger boat? >> Oh, >> he has a fishing boat or a passenger boat? >> He has a fishing boat presently. I don't know how long he has it for but before the passion before his boat I know him to captain like um Exodus I don't know if you know about those company um Exodus that's for Tom and them >> that's back then like years maybe have decades >> that's before 2015 when he was >> well I don't I to be honest with you I don't know I as I said I just know him to captain those boats which I know is licensed boats that operate in the tourist industry so I'm assuming He do has a license. >> So I'm trying to understand you you know him to be regularly captaining these um passenger boats. You know him to be regularly captaining these boats. Why you thought he must have a license? >> Repeat yourself. >> You know is it that you're saying that he know you know he regularly captaining these passenger boats and therefore you thought he had a license? >> Yes. And how regularly would you say he captains boats? >> Well, as I said, that's don't care. That's like decades ago. But presently, as he owns his boat, I could attest that I haven't seen him drive a boat apart from his boat. That's what I could say. I haven't seen if he does it. Maybe at the moment, I didn't see. But I'm telling you, apart from his boat, cuz he drive his boat, he has his fishing boat where he go to sea. And I could see that, you know, apart from his boat, I haven't seen him drive any other boat to be honest with you. >> Yet you put him in charge of carrying nine passengers on your boat. >> Yeah. >> Cuz as I said, I know him to be driving boats. >> Yeah. what you said since he had his fishing boat, you hardly see driving boat. >> The guy's a guy's, as I said, the guy is well known for driving boats. I've known him for decades. As I said, he's drive boats bigger than what I gave him. So, he's more than capable than bringing those passengers cuz he's he drive boats bigger than my boat. Double engine, center console. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-016", "P3-017" ], "caveat": "Unverified historical experience and commercial company connection; not proof of continuous eleven-year passenger operation.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C21", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says Tyson immediately complied with his slowdown request near Windjammer.", "status": "response-to-warning testimony", "source": "III P3-018, P3-019 / P3-U0196, P3-U0197, P3-U0198, P3-U0199, P3-U0200", "source_anchor": "P3-018", "caveat": "This differs from ignored-warning allegations aboard Ocean Angel. Do not mix them.", "exact_excerpt": "Mr. Pascal, you said at some point you would have asked Tyson to take it easy because you felt with the sea conditions he was operating a bit too fast. >> Yes, I did. >> Did he comply? >> Yes, he did immediately. Can you tell us by way of identifying a point a point along the shoreline a point along the coast where that would have happened? >> Um I'll say around Winjama area live wind jama. So it wasn't not it wasn't too far away from when we just left around Winjama area and about in terms of time about how long before the accident would you say that was? um be honest being honest from the time I told him not that we started driving he started driving at a more moderate speed so I think we took like maybe I'll say maybe close to an hour to reach before the the um the accident maybe 50 approximate 50 to an hour 50 minutes to an hour", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C21", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "response-to-warning testimony", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says Tyson immediately complied with his slowdown request near Windjammer.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0196", "P3-U0197", "P3-U0198", "P3-U0199", "P3-U0200" ], "start_char": 19664, "end_char_exclusive": 20508, "exact_source_excerpt": "Mr. Pascal, you said at some point you would have asked Tyson to take it easy because you felt with the sea conditions he was operating a bit too fast. >> Yes, I did. >> Did he comply? >> Yes, he did immediately. Can you tell us by way of identifying a point a point along the shoreline a point along the coast where that would have happened? >> Um I'll say around Winjama area live wind jama. So it wasn't not it wasn't too far away from when we just left around Winjama area and about in terms of time about how long before the accident would you say that was? um be honest being honest from the time I told him not that we started driving he started driving at a more moderate speed so I think we took like maybe I'll say maybe close to an hour to reach before the the um the accident maybe 50 approximate 50 to an hour 50 minutes to an hour", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-018", "P3-019" ], "caveat": "This differs from ignored-warning allegations aboard Ocean Angel. Do not mix them.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Romeon and Chris support an instruction to slow and immediate compliance. Romeon says the reduced speed continued to impact. These accounts do not independently fix the instruction at Windjammer or establish measured speed.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0155", "D2P2-266" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C22", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Estimates fifty minutes to one hour from asking Tyson to slow near Windjammer until collision.", "status": "approximate interval", "source": "III P3-019 / P3-U0200", "source_anchor": "P3-019", "caveat": "Not initially whole-voyage duration; later time estimates vary.", "exact_excerpt": "and about in terms of time about how long before the accident would you say that was? um be honest being honest from the time I told him not that we started driving he started driving at a more moderate speed so I think we took like maybe I'll say maybe close to an hour to reach before the the um the accident maybe 50 approximate 50 to an hour 50 minutes to an hour", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C22", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "approximate interval", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Estimates fifty minutes to one hour from asking Tyson to slow near Windjammer until collision.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0200" ], "start_char": 20141, "end_char_exclusive": 20508, "exact_source_excerpt": "and about in terms of time about how long before the accident would you say that was? um be honest being honest from the time I told him not that we started driving he started driving at a more moderate speed so I think we took like maybe I'll say maybe close to an hour to reach before the the um the accident maybe 50 approximate 50 to an hour 50 minutes to an hour", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-019" ], "caveat": "Not initially whole-voyage duration; later time estimates vary.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Romeon and Chris support an instruction to slow and immediate compliance. Romeon says the reduced speed continued to impact. These accounts do not independently fix the instruction at Windjammer or establish measured speed.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0155", "D2P2-266" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C23", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Lookout sat high forward near the bow from departure; owner thought view clear; reports no warning of another vessel.", "status": "lookout position and warning account", "source": "III P3-019, P3-020 / P3-U0200, P3-U0201, P3-U0202, P3-U0203, P3-U0204, P3-U0205, P3-U0206, P3-U0207, P3-U0208, P3-U0209, P3-U0210, P3-U0211, P3-U0212", "source_anchor": "P3-019", "caveat": "Later qualifies certainty as assumption; no direct lookout evidence in Part III.", "exact_excerpt": "You indicated that one Mado would have been your lookout. >> Yes, I could attest to that. >> Where does the lookout usually place him or herself? Well, on that vessel, >> that specific individual, for some reason, I don't know, he loves sitting. There's I how would I explain it to the front of the boat, there's a seat before the bow, and there's a piece of stick, a line like this long. I think it's to to um adjust the boat or um make the boat like stronger, I think. So, they place a piece of fiberglass is seated right on top of that. So that's close to the top where he could see anything that come >> and I'm asking again during the journey >> and just prior to the accident was that where he was seated where you just described >> that's where he was seated from the time we left the port um Gul whatever the destination may And in your estimation, was could there have been anything impeding his view to the front? >> Repeat yourself. >> In your estimation, >> Mhm. >> is there any do you believe there could have been anything preventing him from seeing ahead? >> Um, no. where where he was seated. He could have seen anything. From your recollection, did Mado sound any warning to the captain of an oncoming vessel? >> No. Mr. Chair,", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C23", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "lookout position and warning account", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Lookout sat high forward near the bow from departure; owner thought view clear; reports no warning of another vessel.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0200", "P3-U0201", "P3-U0202", "P3-U0203", "P3-U0204", "P3-U0205", "P3-U0206", "P3-U0207", "P3-U0208", "P3-U0209", "P3-U0210", "P3-U0211", "P3-U0212" ], "start_char": 20512, "end_char_exclusive": 21756, "exact_source_excerpt": "You indicated that one Mado would have been your lookout. >> Yes, I could attest to that. >> Where does the lookout usually place him or herself? Well, on that vessel, >> that specific individual, for some reason, I don't know, he loves sitting. There's I how would I explain it to the front of the boat, there's a seat before the bow, and there's a piece of stick, a line like this long. I think it's to to um adjust the boat or um make the boat like stronger, I think. So, they place a piece of fiberglass is seated right on top of that. So that's close to the top where he could see anything that come >> and I'm asking again during the journey >> and just prior to the accident was that where he was seated where you just described >> that's where he was seated from the time we left the port um Gul whatever the destination may And in your estimation, was could there have been anything impeding his view to the front? >> Repeat yourself. >> In your estimation, >> Mhm. >> is there any do you believe there could have been anything preventing him from seeing ahead? >> Um, no. where where he was seated. He could have seen anything. From your recollection, did Mado sound any warning to the captain of an oncoming vessel? >> No. Mr. Chair,", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-019", "P3-020" ], "caveat": "Later qualifies certainty as assumption; no direct lookout evidence in Part III.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Butcher/Mavado gives his own evidence on Day 2 and denies being the lookout. Chris ultimately says his lookout description was inferred from the bow seat; Lester does not know of an appointment. Pascal’s Day 1 assignment claim remains part of the record, now disputed.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P2-142", "D2P2-280", "D2P3-S106" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C24", "part": "III", "speaker": "Unidentified commission officer; Pascal confirms", "statement": "Hearing identifies Mado/Mavado as Janelle Butcher; Pascal accepts but says he did not know the government name.", "status": "formal alias clarification", "source": "III P3-020, P3-021 / P3-U0212, P3-U0213, P3-U0214, P3-U0215, P3-U0216, P3-U0217, P3-U0218, P3-U0219, P3-U0220, P3-U0221", "source_anchor": "P3-020", "caveat": "Full name appears Jonel/Jel/Janelle variants. Formal alias link reliable in context; spelling needs witness list.", "exact_excerpt": "just for the record because I realize we are using aliases. Just for the record, I want to establish that Mado is one and the same as Janelle Butcher. >> His name >> Mado. You said his name is Mado. >> I want to establish that Mado and Janelle Butcher >> is one of the same person. >> He's the Janelle Butcher. >> Okay. >> Yeah. But you know Yeah. >> Yeah. So since you were using aliases, I just need for the record to establish that, please. >> Yeah, I don't know his government's name because you know what?", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for identification exchange; low for officer identity", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C24", "source_part": 3, "person": "Unidentified commission officer; Pascal confirms", "evidence_category": "formal alias clarification", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for identification exchange; low for officer identity", "statement": "Hearing identifies Mado/Mavado as Janelle Butcher; Pascal accepts but says he did not know the government name.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0212", "P3-U0213", "P3-U0214", "P3-U0215", "P3-U0216", "P3-U0217", "P3-U0218", "P3-U0219", "P3-U0220", "P3-U0221" ], "start_char": 21760, "end_char_exclusive": 22270, "exact_source_excerpt": "just for the record because I realize we are using aliases. Just for the record, I want to establish that Mado is one and the same as Janelle Butcher. >> His name >> Mado. You said his name is Mado. >> I want to establish that Mado and Janelle Butcher >> is one of the same person. >> He's the Janelle Butcher. >> Okay. >> Yeah. But you know Yeah. >> Yeah. So since you were using aliases, I just need for the record to establish that, please. >> Yeah, I don't know his government's name because you know what?", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-020", "P3-021" ], "caveat": "Full name appears Jonel/Jel/Janelle variants. Formal alias link reliable in context; spelling needs witness list.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C25", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says Taylor supplied funds for herself and her boyfriend; answers he still would not have done safety protocols if all locals had paid.", "status": "payment and trip-character clarification", "source": "III P3-021, P3-022, P3-023 / P3-U0228, P3-U0229, P3-U0230, P3-U0231, P3-U0232, P3-U0233, P3-U0234, P3-U0235, P3-U0236, P3-U0237, P3-U0238, P3-U0239, P3-U0240, P3-U0241, P3-U0242, P3-U0243, P3-U0244, P3-U0245, P3-U0246, P3-U0247, P3-U0248, P3-U0249, P3-U0250, P3-U0251, P3-U0252, P3-U0253, P3-U0254, P3-U0255, P3-U0256, P3-U0257, P3-U0258, P3-U0259", "source_anchor": "P3-021", "caveat": "Amount, fare agreement and trip legal classification unresolved. Claim that it was entirely unpaid is no longer supportable.", "exact_excerpt": "Earlier you said that um the trip on the night in question was not commercial. >> Mhm. >> It was not a paid trip. Well, um, a two two or three. No, it was how would I say Taylor and her boyfriend, but Taylor was the person who gave me some funds for bringing them up. Because what what what the distinction I want to make, you said um you would sometimes or most times adhere to safety protocols such as briefings and the like. >> Mhm. >> When you have guests >> Mhm. >> on on trips. >> Mhm. >> I take it that that's for money. >> Mhm. >> When you have people on board for money. >> It's not for money. It's just I >> Listen listen closely. >> The night in question. >> Yeah. You said that one of your main reasons for not adhering to safety protocols was because it was a trip for fun. >> No, no, no, no, no, no. Not not no. You have it all wrong. Not because of that. >> Not totally wrong about that. I didn't meant that that way. At no point in time I said such. >> Okay. You said if we were operating commercially, I would do protocols. >> Mhm. >> That night we were going out to party. So I did not use the protocols. >> Yeah. But I didn't meant it that way where you know I just don't do protocols for locals and I only do it for >> No, I am I'm still going to ask you. >> Mhm. >> If all the locals on your boat on that night >> had paid you >> Mhm. >> had paid you for taking them to Gilelay and back >> you collected fees from them. >> Mhm. >> Would you have done the protocol? >> No. That's what I'm saying. Why? >> Cuz you know, as I tell you, it's just just something we just don't do within ourselves. That's what I'm trying to say. I said it earlier on. Just like indicating the lighthouse, that's something. It's a a weing. We don't do it. It's there. We the laws are there, but we don't do it. Like it's just within us. We don't do it. The majority, I could say that we don't adhere to the um the lighthouse. We don't inform the lighthouse. We don't we don't we don't inform them. We don't do safety briefings. We don't put live vest on passengers.", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_generalization", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C25", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "payment and trip-character clarification", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_generalization", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says Taylor supplied funds for herself and her boyfriend; answers he still would not have done safety protocols if all locals had paid.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0228", "P3-U0229", "P3-U0230", "P3-U0231", "P3-U0232", "P3-U0233", "P3-U0234", "P3-U0235", "P3-U0236", "P3-U0237", "P3-U0238", "P3-U0239", "P3-U0240", "P3-U0241", "P3-U0242", "P3-U0243", "P3-U0244", "P3-U0245", "P3-U0246", "P3-U0247", "P3-U0248", "P3-U0249", "P3-U0250", "P3-U0251", "P3-U0252", "P3-U0253", "P3-U0254", "P3-U0255", "P3-U0256", "P3-U0257", "P3-U0258", "P3-U0259" ], "start_char": 22761, "end_char_exclusive": 24824, "exact_source_excerpt": "Earlier you said that um the trip on the night in question was not commercial. >> Mhm. >> It was not a paid trip. Well, um, a two two or three. No, it was how would I say Taylor and her boyfriend, but Taylor was the person who gave me some funds for bringing them up. Because what what what the distinction I want to make, you said um you would sometimes or most times adhere to safety protocols such as briefings and the like. >> Mhm. >> When you have guests >> Mhm. >> on on trips. >> Mhm. >> I take it that that's for money. >> Mhm. >> When you have people on board for money. >> It's not for money. It's just I >> Listen listen closely. >> The night in question. >> Yeah. You said that one of your main reasons for not adhering to safety protocols was because it was a trip for fun. >> No, no, no, no, no, no. Not not no. You have it all wrong. Not because of that. >> Not totally wrong about that. I didn't meant that that way. At no point in time I said such. >> Okay. You said if we were operating commercially, I would do protocols. >> Mhm. >> That night we were going out to party. So I did not use the protocols. >> Yeah. But I didn't meant it that way where you know I just don't do protocols for locals and I only do it for >> No, I am I'm still going to ask you. >> Mhm. >> If all the locals on your boat on that night >> had paid you >> Mhm. >> had paid you for taking them to Gilelay and back >> you collected fees from them. >> Mhm. >> Would you have done the protocol? >> No. That's what I'm saying. Why? >> Cuz you know, as I tell you, it's just just something we just don't do within ourselves. That's what I'm trying to say. I said it earlier on. Just like indicating the lighthouse, that's something. It's a a weing. We don't do it. It's there. We the laws are there, but we don't do it. Like it's just within us. We don't do it. The majority, I could say that we don't adhere to the um the lighthouse. We don't inform the lighthouse. We don't we don't we don't inform them. We don't do safety briefings. We don't put live vest on passengers.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-021", "P3-022", "P3-023" ], "caveat": "Amount, fare agreement and trip legal classification unresolved. Claim that it was entirely unpaid is no longer supportable.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C26", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Had not personally asked lookout what he saw; says captain asked and lookout said he saw nothing.", "status": "lookout follow-up admission and hearsay", "source": "III P3-024, P3-025 / P3-U0268, P3-U0269, P3-U0270, P3-U0271, P3-U0272, P3-U0273, P3-U0274, P3-U0275, P3-U0276, P3-U0277, P3-U0278, P3-U0279", "source_anchor": "P3-024", "caveat": "This is reported discussion, not lookout's sworn evidence. Later says he overheard discussions himself.", "exact_excerpt": "Would you be able to explain at all why? Have you had any discussion with him on that? Would you be able to explain at all why he saw nothing? >> I cannot answer that. >> You cannot answer that. Have you had any discussion with him on it? >> Oh, Janelle. >> Yes. >> No. >> But I will ask you, you have a lookout who gave no warning to the captain. Your vessel is involved in a boating collision. >> Mhm. where four persons have lost their lives unfortunately. >> Mhm. >> And as the lookout, you have not made it your business to find out from him what happened on that night, what he saw, what he did not see. >> Well, the captain the captain think the captain asked him, you know, was he able to see anything? He said he never saw anything. But not you. You didn't have that conversation with him. >> No, I haven't. No.", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_hearsay", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C26", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "lookout follow-up admission and hearsay", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_hearsay", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Had not personally asked lookout what he saw; says captain asked and lookout said he saw nothing.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0268", "P3-U0269", "P3-U0270", "P3-U0271", "P3-U0272", "P3-U0273", "P3-U0274", "P3-U0275", "P3-U0276", "P3-U0277", "P3-U0278", "P3-U0279" ], "start_char": 25600, "end_char_exclusive": 26420, "exact_source_excerpt": "Would you be able to explain at all why? Have you had any discussion with him on that? Would you be able to explain at all why he saw nothing? >> I cannot answer that. >> You cannot answer that. Have you had any discussion with him on it? >> Oh, Janelle. >> Yes. >> No. >> But I will ask you, you have a lookout who gave no warning to the captain. Your vessel is involved in a boating collision. >> Mhm. where four persons have lost their lives unfortunately. >> Mhm. >> And as the lookout, you have not made it your business to find out from him what happened on that night, what he saw, what he did not see. >> Well, the captain the captain think the captain asked him, you know, was he able to see anything? He said he never saw anything. But not you. You didn't have that conversation with him. >> No, I haven't. No.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-024", "P3-025" ], "caveat": "This is reported discussion, not lookout's sworn evidence. Later says he overheard discussions himself.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Butcher/Mavado gives his own evidence on Day 2 and denies being the lookout. Chris ultimately says his lookout description was inferred from the bow seat; Lester does not know of an appointment. Pascal’s Day 1 assignment claim remains part of the record, now disputed.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P2-142", "D2P2-280", "D2P3-S106" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C27", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Sat immediately ahead of console, could not see beyond bow, and impact propelled him one seat forward.", "status": "seat/sightline and impact testimony", "source": "III P3-025, P3-026, P3-027 / P3-U0279, P3-U0280, P3-U0281, P3-U0282, P3-U0283, P3-U0284, P3-U0285, P3-U0286, P3-U0287, P3-U0288, P3-U0289, P3-U0290, P3-U0291, P3-U0292, P3-U0293, P3-U0294, P3-U0295, P3-U0296, P3-U0297, P3-U0298, P3-U0299, P3-U0300, P3-U0301, P3-U0302, P3-U0303, P3-U0304, P3-U0305", "source_anchor": "P3-025", "caveat": "He heard a sound but cannot judge its loudness due to hearing difficulty. No contact-side eyewitness description.", "exact_excerpt": "From where you were seated on the vessel, how far ahead of you could you have seen? >> Repeat yourself. >> From where you were seated >> on the vessel, how far ahead of you could you have seen? Um, well, the bow of the boat and the lights on the shoreline, not at the front of me because I couldn't see where I'm seated. I can I can see anything at the front of me. >> So you could not see beyond the bow? >> No, I couldn't see nothing beyond the bow. In your experience as a boat owner, as one who has been out there on the sea on similar trips, um, is it a common thing or should I say, do you know of any other instances where a lookout would be in your estimation perfectly placed? to possibly see what was happening ahead yet did not. Do you know of any other such incidents? Is it something common >> what this incident happened? >> No. No. That a lookout can be perfectly positioned on the vessel yet not able to pick up danger ahead. Is that something for for some reason in in in maritime travel that can happen? That is possible. >> Well, in the day in the daytime, well, in the night time, if person doesn't have a light that nowhere a lookout could see something that's coming, it doesn't have a light. >> But would that also not depend on visibility? Well, as I said, it was the visibility was a little a little poor as well, but it was enough to see. Was enough to see because as I said, I was seeing on the shoreline just that it was just dark that day. The visibility was enough to see. It was clear enough to see. But I'm asking have have you ever performed the role of a lookout? >> Um yes I before I become a boat owner have >> um at night around that same time. >> Daytime. >> Only daytime. >> Daytime. Yeah. Yeah. Can you describe the impact in terms of force? Well, as I said, in terms of force, I cannot answer that based on my hearing problem. So, as I said earlier on, I just heard a I heard a sound. I don't know how loud it was. >> Okay. So, let me let me ask you the question another way. >> So, the two vessels have collided. >> Mhm. >> How how heavy was you? I'm sure you would have jolted. You would have jerked. >> Yeah. I >> How how how heavy was that from your standpoint? >> And what rate you looking at like >> I don't know. You tell me. I I >> no but I I can just say because from where I was seated I was seated right um in front of the captain the seat in front of the console that's where I was seated after the impact I flew over onto the second seat. So just a seat apart from where I was seated. So you could just imagine the impact what that would send me over. >> Is that a seat forward or a sit back? >> No, a seat forward. >> A seat forward. We have the second seat.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C27", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "seat/sightline and impact testimony", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Sat immediately ahead of console, could not see beyond bow, and impact propelled him one seat forward.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0279", "P3-U0280", "P3-U0281", "P3-U0282", "P3-U0283", "P3-U0284", "P3-U0285", "P3-U0286", "P3-U0287", "P3-U0288", "P3-U0289", "P3-U0290", "P3-U0291", "P3-U0292", "P3-U0293", "P3-U0294", "P3-U0295", "P3-U0296", "P3-U0297", "P3-U0298", "P3-U0299", "P3-U0300", "P3-U0301", "P3-U0302", "P3-U0303", "P3-U0304", "P3-U0305" ], "start_char": 26421, "end_char_exclusive": 29134, "exact_source_excerpt": "From where you were seated on the vessel, how far ahead of you could you have seen? >> Repeat yourself. >> From where you were seated >> on the vessel, how far ahead of you could you have seen? Um, well, the bow of the boat and the lights on the shoreline, not at the front of me because I couldn't see where I'm seated. I can I can see anything at the front of me. >> So you could not see beyond the bow? >> No, I couldn't see nothing beyond the bow. In your experience as a boat owner, as one who has been out there on the sea on similar trips, um, is it a common thing or should I say, do you know of any other instances where a lookout would be in your estimation perfectly placed? to possibly see what was happening ahead yet did not. Do you know of any other such incidents? Is it something common >> what this incident happened? >> No. No. That a lookout can be perfectly positioned on the vessel yet not able to pick up danger ahead. Is that something for for some reason in in in maritime travel that can happen? That is possible. >> Well, in the day in the daytime, well, in the night time, if person doesn't have a light that nowhere a lookout could see something that's coming, it doesn't have a light. >> But would that also not depend on visibility? Well, as I said, it was the visibility was a little a little poor as well, but it was enough to see. Was enough to see because as I said, I was seeing on the shoreline just that it was just dark that day. The visibility was enough to see. It was clear enough to see. But I'm asking have have you ever performed the role of a lookout? >> Um yes I before I become a boat owner have >> um at night around that same time. >> Daytime. >> Only daytime. >> Daytime. Yeah. Yeah. Can you describe the impact in terms of force? Well, as I said, in terms of force, I cannot answer that based on my hearing problem. So, as I said earlier on, I just heard a I heard a sound. I don't know how loud it was. >> Okay. So, let me let me ask you the question another way. >> So, the two vessels have collided. >> Mhm. >> How how heavy was you? I'm sure you would have jolted. You would have jerked. >> Yeah. I >> How how how heavy was that from your standpoint? >> And what rate you looking at like >> I don't know. You tell me. I I >> no but I I can just say because from where I was seated I was seated right um in front of the captain the seat in front of the console that's where I was seated after the impact I flew over onto the second seat. So just a seat apart from where I was seated. So you could just imagine the impact what that would send me over. >> Is that a seat forward or a sit back? >> No, a seat forward. >> A seat forward. We have the second seat.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-025", "P3-026", "P3-027" ], "caveat": "He heard a sound but cannot judge its loudness due to hearing difficulty. No contact-side eyewitness description.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C28", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says Tyson did not increase speed after slowing; boat later stopped so a requested life jacket could be obtained.", "status": "speed and jacket-stop testimony", "source": "III P3-027 / P3-U0305, P3-U0306, P3-U0307, P3-U0308, P3-U0309", "source_anchor": "P3-027", "caveat": "A material qualification to earlier faster-than-moderate account; no numeric speed supplied.", "exact_excerpt": "So after you asked your captain to slow down a near wind jammer, you said he complied. >> Yeah. Yeah, he did. He did. Did he at any point after that compliance after he slowed down? >> Mhm. >> Did he at any point increase his speed again? >> No, he didn't. Even um at the time when I tell him slow down, he did he he did slow down. And there was a next there was a next um how would I say that? There's a next time we had to stop to take the live vest for one of the guys that asked for the live vest.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C28", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "speed and jacket-stop testimony", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says Tyson did not increase speed after slowing; boat later stopped so a requested life jacket could be obtained.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0305", "P3-U0306", "P3-U0307", "P3-U0308", "P3-U0309" ], "start_char": 29135, "end_char_exclusive": 29636, "exact_source_excerpt": "So after you asked your captain to slow down a near wind jammer, you said he complied. >> Yeah. Yeah, he did. He did. Did he at any point after that compliance after he slowed down? >> Mhm. >> Did he at any point increase his speed again? >> No, he didn't. Even um at the time when I tell him slow down, he did he he did slow down. And there was a next there was a next um how would I say that? There's a next time we had to stop to take the live vest for one of the guys that asked for the live vest.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-027" ], "caveat": "A material qualification to earlier faster-than-moderate account; no numeric speed supplied.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 identifies the wearer as Romeon Williams. Taylor and Romeon describe her relaying the request and helping him put it on. Their approximately 2–5/about 5 minute interval differs from Pascal’s estimate. Later claims about a girl wearing it are qualified as assumption.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0119", "D2P1-P0156", "D2P2-191" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C29", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Clarifies Taylor River, Roman's girlfriend, asked for his jacket, about ten–twenty minutes after the slowdown.", "status": "life-jacket requester correction", "source": "III P3-028 / P3-U0310, P3-U0311, P3-U0312, P3-U0313, P3-U0314, P3-U0315, P3-U0316, P3-U0317", "source_anchor": "P3-028", "caveat": "Conflicts or is difficult to reconcile with initial ten minutes before impact given fifty–sixty-minute post-slowdown interval. Times are approximate.", "exact_excerpt": "No, no, no, no. When I when I tell the captain slow down because of the swells of the sea, he didn't ask for it. You know, he asked for it maybe I'll say 10 20 minutes after. >> Yeah, that's what I'm asking. So, he would have asked for the life vest after you asked the captain to slow down >> after. Not immediately, but after. Yeah, after. >> It wasn't even the one who asked me for the live vest. It was his girlfriend that asked me for the live saw him which was Taylor. >> What's the girlfriend's name? >> Taylor River. >> Taylor. >> Taylor. Yeah.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C29", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "life-jacket requester correction", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Clarifies Taylor River, Roman's girlfriend, asked for his jacket, about ten–twenty minutes after the slowdown.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0310", "P3-U0311", "P3-U0312", "P3-U0313", "P3-U0314", "P3-U0315", "P3-U0316", "P3-U0317" ], "start_char": 29733, "end_char_exclusive": 30285, "exact_source_excerpt": "No, no, no, no. When I when I tell the captain slow down because of the swells of the sea, he didn't ask for it. You know, he asked for it maybe I'll say 10 20 minutes after. >> Yeah, that's what I'm asking. So, he would have asked for the life vest after you asked the captain to slow down >> after. Not immediately, but after. Yeah, after. >> It wasn't even the one who asked me for the live vest. It was his girlfriend that asked me for the live saw him which was Taylor. >> What's the girlfriend's name? >> Taylor River. >> Taylor. >> Taylor. Yeah.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-028" ], "caveat": "Conflicts or is difficult to reconcile with initial ten minutes before impact given fifty–sixty-minute post-slowdown interval. Times are approximate.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 identifies the wearer as Romeon Williams. Taylor and Romeon describe her relaying the request and helping him put it on. Their approximately 2–5/about 5 minute interval differs from Pascal’s estimate. Later claims about a girl wearing it are qualified as assumption.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P1-P0119", "D2P1-P0156", "D2P2-191" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C30", "part": "III", "speaker": "Chair and Pascal", "statement": "Chair challenges licence checking, alcohol purchase, absent briefing and jackets; Pascal reiterates Tyson not regular captain and acknowledges hearing concerns.", "status": "procedural scrutiny and response", "source": "III P3-029, P3-030 / P3-U0322, P3-U0323, P3-U0324, P3-U0325, P3-U0326, P3-U0327", "source_anchor": "P3-029", "caveat": "Chair's statement that safety briefings avoid what happened is a general assertion, not a causal finding that briefing would prevent collision.", "exact_excerpt": ">> But what I'm saying is that I'm not aware that he doesn't have a license for period of time. You did nothing to ascertain to to ensure that before you put the lives of nine persons in the hands of this man that he was in fact qualified to captain a boat. Well, at at that time, as I said, it's you know, event we going to and it's not, you know, people we we um how would I say guess about you speak about this as if well, I mean, since it's a fat you're going to, >> it's it's not as if people's lives are involved in that. Four people died, you know, as a result of that collision. >> It's nothing to be taken lightly, you know, that yeah, we're just going to affect. So, that's okay. It's not okay. Security briefings and safety protocols. Safety briefings and protocols are to be carried out precisely to avoid what happened happening. It doesn't matter whether you're talking about tourists or persons you're doing chores from or your best friends and neighbors and family members. I understood >> what matters is that the lives of nine persons are on the line and you have you have engaged a person to captain the boat to carry those nine persons to and from um Suare and and Gile without ascertaining whether that person was legally qualified to do so. >> Yes. But as I said earlier on, I understood clearly what you were saying. But the time, as I said, Tyson is not my captain. He's not my captain. >> Yes, he was your captain on that night when you engaged him to entrust nine lives in his hands. He was your captain. You caused him to become your captain 11 years after he ceased to be legally entitled to do so. Also, you were purchasing alcoholic beverages no less than four for that person in whose hands you were going to entrust the nine lives. You also did not cause any security, any safety briefings or protocols to be followed. You also did not cause the nine people on board to to wear life live life jackets or even to make them aware that they should do so. Apart from one man who whose girlfriend said he couldn't swim and asked for a life vest for him. These are very very serious matters and I'm a little concerned that you seem to treat them as if we were just going to a fence. So that's okay. Four people died. ", "epistemic_status": "panel_proposition", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high by sequence and chair address", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C30", "source_part": 3, "person": "Chair and Pascal", "evidence_category": "procedural scrutiny and response", "epistemic_status": "panel_proposition", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high by sequence and chair address", "statement": "Chair challenges licence checking, alcohol purchase, absent briefing and jackets; Pascal reiterates Tyson not regular captain and acknowledges hearing concerns.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0322", "P3-U0323", "P3-U0324", "P3-U0325", "P3-U0326", "P3-U0327" ], "start_char": 30827, "end_char_exclusive": 33070, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> But what I'm saying is that I'm not aware that he doesn't have a license for period of time. You did nothing to ascertain to to ensure that before you put the lives of nine persons in the hands of this man that he was in fact qualified to captain a boat. Well, at at that time, as I said, it's you know, event we going to and it's not, you know, people we we um how would I say guess about you speak about this as if well, I mean, since it's a fat you're going to, >> it's it's not as if people's lives are involved in that. Four people died, you know, as a result of that collision. >> It's nothing to be taken lightly, you know, that yeah, we're just going to affect. So, that's okay. It's not okay. Security briefings and safety protocols. Safety briefings and protocols are to be carried out precisely to avoid what happened happening. It doesn't matter whether you're talking about tourists or persons you're doing chores from or your best friends and neighbors and family members. I understood >> what matters is that the lives of nine persons are on the line and you have you have engaged a person to captain the boat to carry those nine persons to and from um Suare and and Gile without ascertaining whether that person was legally qualified to do so. >> Yes. But as I said earlier on, I understood clearly what you were saying. But the time, as I said, Tyson is not my captain. He's not my captain. >> Yes, he was your captain on that night when you engaged him to entrust nine lives in his hands. He was your captain. You caused him to become your captain 11 years after he ceased to be legally entitled to do so. Also, you were purchasing alcoholic beverages no less than four for that person in whose hands you were going to entrust the nine lives. You also did not cause any security, any safety briefings or protocols to be followed. You also did not cause the nine people on board to to wear life live life jackets or even to make them aware that they should do so. Apart from one man who whose girlfriend said he couldn't swim and asked for a life vest for him. These are very very serious matters and I'm a little concerned that you seem to treat them as if we were just going to a fence. So that's okay. Four people died. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-029", "P3-030" ], "caveat": "Chair's statement that safety briefings avoid what happened is a general assertion, not a causal finding that briefing would prevent collision.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C31", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Retracts assertion lookout could see anything, replacing it with assumption about lit objects; cannot answer whether lookout could detect an unlit vessel.", "status": "qualification of lookout inference", "source": "III P3-031, P3-032, P3-033 / P3-U0339, P3-U0340, P3-U0341, P3-U0342, P3-U0343, P3-U0344, P3-U0345, P3-U0346, P3-U0347, P3-U0348, P3-U0349, P3-U0350, P3-U0351, P3-U0352, P3-U0353, P3-U0354, P3-U0355, P3-U0356, P3-U0357, P3-U0358, P3-U0359, P3-U0360, P3-U0361, P3-U0362, P3-U0363, P3-U0364, P3-U0365, P3-U0366, P3-U0367, P3-U0368, P3-U0369", "source_anchor": "P3-031", "caveat": "This is a material clarification. Do not quote the earlier absolute while suppressing qualification.", "exact_excerpt": "Well, from where he was sitting, that question would have to be something you ask him because where he was seated, he alone could see what he could see. >> Yeah. with you. I'm going on your statement. >> Mhm. >> That from where Mavado was sitting, >> he could see anything. >> Yeah. Because where he was, >> this is what you said. >> Mhm. >> Cuz where he was seated, um, well, let's let me refuse. I would assume he can see whatever's coming in front of him. I'll retract my statement. >> Okay. >> I would assume you'll be able to see what's coming ahead of him. And if the boat had navigation lights >> Mhm. >> you would say that there's no way he would not have seen it. >> No way. >> And if it did not have navigation lights and you had navigation lights >> and he was at that well pushed where he was, do you >> on the other boat? >> Do you believe that he may still have been able to see that other boat coming even without its navigation light? >> You mean like if he was on the other boat? >> No. No. He seated in a position on your boat. Mhm. >> where he can see anything. >> Mhm. >> I'm asking you whether even if that oncoming boat did not have navigation lights on, >> could he would he have discerned an oncoming uh object coming towards your boat? >> That from some distance away? >> That I cannot answer for you because as I said, he's the one that seen he could tell you what he could have possibly seen. But I know on that night it was a bit visible. So that question in regards to Mo I cannot answer it. Cannot answer it if he could have seen. I just know for sure where he was seated if there was any oncoming thing with lights he would have seen. >> So you've altered it really to say that that from where he was seated he could see any oncoming object with lights. >> With lights. But in terms of whether he might have seen that oncoming uh vessel without lights, you're saying that part >> I cannot answer. >> I cannot answer that because >> that's adequate.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C31", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "qualification of lookout inference", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Retracts assertion lookout could see anything, replacing it with assumption about lit objects; cannot answer whether lookout could detect an unlit vessel.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0339", "P3-U0340", "P3-U0341", "P3-U0342", "P3-U0343", "P3-U0344", "P3-U0345", "P3-U0346", "P3-U0347", "P3-U0348", "P3-U0349", "P3-U0350", "P3-U0351", "P3-U0352", "P3-U0353", "P3-U0354", "P3-U0355", "P3-U0356", "P3-U0357", "P3-U0358", "P3-U0359", "P3-U0360", "P3-U0361", "P3-U0362", "P3-U0363", "P3-U0364", "P3-U0365", "P3-U0366", "P3-U0367", "P3-U0368", "P3-U0369" ], "start_char": 34020, "end_char_exclusive": 35999, "exact_source_excerpt": "Well, from where he was sitting, that question would have to be something you ask him because where he was seated, he alone could see what he could see. >> Yeah. with you. I'm going on your statement. >> Mhm. >> That from where Mavado was sitting, >> he could see anything. >> Yeah. Because where he was, >> this is what you said. >> Mhm. >> Cuz where he was seated, um, well, let's let me refuse. I would assume he can see whatever's coming in front of him. I'll retract my statement. >> Okay. >> I would assume you'll be able to see what's coming ahead of him. And if the boat had navigation lights >> Mhm. >> you would say that there's no way he would not have seen it. >> No way. >> And if it did not have navigation lights and you had navigation lights >> and he was at that well pushed where he was, do you >> on the other boat? >> Do you believe that he may still have been able to see that other boat coming even without its navigation light? >> You mean like if he was on the other boat? >> No. No. He seated in a position on your boat. Mhm. >> where he can see anything. >> Mhm. >> I'm asking you whether even if that oncoming boat did not have navigation lights on, >> could he would he have discerned an oncoming uh object coming towards your boat? >> That from some distance away? >> That I cannot answer for you because as I said, he's the one that seen he could tell you what he could have possibly seen. But I know on that night it was a bit visible. So that question in regards to Mo I cannot answer it. Cannot answer it if he could have seen. I just know for sure where he was seated if there was any oncoming thing with lights he would have seen. >> So you've altered it really to say that that from where he was seated he could see any oncoming object with lights. >> With lights. But in terms of whether he might have seen that oncoming uh vessel without lights, you're saying that part >> I cannot answer. >> I cannot answer that because >> that's adequate.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-031", "P3-032", "P3-033" ], "caveat": "This is a material clarification. Do not quote the earlier absolute while suppressing qualification.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Butcher/Mavado gives his own evidence on Day 2 and denies being the lookout. Chris ultimately says his lookout description was inferred from the bow seat; Lester does not know of an appointment. Pascal’s Day 1 assignment claim remains part of the record, now disputed.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P2-142", "D2P2-280", "D2P3-S106" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C32", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says he named Graham Matthew as Boatmaster and regular captain Daryl Paul as crew after SLASPA requested a higher licence grade for captain.", "status": "certification arrangement admission", "source": "III P3-033, P3-034, P3-035 / P3-U0371, P3-U0372, P3-U0373, P3-U0374, P3-U0375, P3-U0376, P3-U0377, P3-U0378, P3-U0379, P3-U0380, P3-U0381, P3-U0382, P3-U0383, P3-U0384, P3-U0385, P3-U0386, P3-U0387, P3-U0388, P3-U0389, P3-U0390, P3-U0391, P3-U0392, P3-U0393, P3-U0394, P3-U0395, P3-U0396, P3-U0397, P3-U0398, P3-U0399, P3-U0400, P3-U0401, P3-U0402, P3-U0403, P3-U0404, P3-U0405, P3-U0406, P3-U0407, P3-U0408, P3-U0409, P3-U0410, P3-U0411, P3-U0412, P3-U0413, P3-U0414, P3-U0415, P3-U0416, P3-U0417, P3-U0418", "source_anchor": "P3-033", "caveat": "Names/grades unstable; no full licensing exhibit in supplied text. Graham is not a new separate person when ASR later says Charles.", "exact_excerpt": "Mr. Pascal, who is the registered B boat master for your vessel? Um, so with that being said, Daryl is my captain, registered captain, but I think the time I was supposed to reg um, how would I say it? Go to slasper, they was asking me for um, I think a grid two uh, grid two or grid grid three or grid two captain. And then at that point I end up um because I wanted to insure the boat. So I end up calling um Graham Mafra. Graham Mafra I could recall that I end up he has a higher grid than Dariel. So I end up putting him as the captain and I had um Darl as the crew. >> Right. So, you said on the night of the incident? >> Mhm. >> Your regular captain could not go because he went with his own boat. >> Yeah, he went with his own boat. >> Who is your regular captain? >> Well, it's Darla. Daryl what? Daryl Paul. So you're saying in the statement just prior that you could not have registered and inshot the boat >> with Daryl because of his level boat license. Yes, that's >> so you used Graham Matthew. >> Yes. >> However, you continue to use Darl Paul who because of his the level of his license certification >> would not have been accepted as the boat captain. >> Mhm. >> You agree? >> Repeat yourself. >> I am saying you could not have registered Darl Paul >> as the boat captain. >> Yeah. because of the level of his certification. >> Yes, the captain. >> Is that correct? >> Yes. >> That that Slasper and the insurance would not accept Daryl Paul. >> No, no, not the insurance. The insurance accept him. It's just um Slasper. >> So, Slasper would not >> Slasper tell me um my captain need a um license certificate like a grade two or grade whatever. Okay, good. So, Darl Paul did not have that. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. So, you used Graham Matthew >> Mhm. >> to get the boat registered. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> Mhm. >> But yet continued with Darl Paul >> who is not certified. >> He's certified. >> Yeah. But let's go again. >> He's certified and he could he could operate in the waters. >> Okay. So, why? >> They just asked me that. I don't know for what reason. They just tell me um my captain needs like a grid too, but he could operate in the waters. He could operate in the waters. So that is something we we that is something we need some clarity on, Mr. um >> Yes, you could you could clarify with them. He could operate in a waters. He's >> Yeah, but but he's still not registered as your boat captain. >> Repeat yourself. >> He's not registered as your boat captain. >> He's still he's not registered >> as your boat captain. Graham Matthew is the boat master, isn't he? >> Yes, he is. >> Graham Matthew, you have Darl Paul registered as crew. >> Yes, at the time.", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_regulator_account", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C32", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "certification arrangement admission", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_regulator_account", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says he named Graham Matthew as Boatmaster and regular captain Daryl Paul as crew after SLASPA requested a higher licence grade for captain.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0371", "P3-U0372", "P3-U0373", "P3-U0374", "P3-U0375", "P3-U0376", "P3-U0377", "P3-U0378", "P3-U0379", "P3-U0380", "P3-U0381", "P3-U0382", "P3-U0383", "P3-U0384", "P3-U0385", "P3-U0386", "P3-U0387", "P3-U0388", "P3-U0389", "P3-U0390", "P3-U0391", "P3-U0392", "P3-U0393", "P3-U0394", "P3-U0395", "P3-U0396", "P3-U0397", "P3-U0398", "P3-U0399", "P3-U0400", "P3-U0401", "P3-U0402", "P3-U0403", "P3-U0404", "P3-U0405", "P3-U0406", "P3-U0407", "P3-U0408", "P3-U0409", "P3-U0410", "P3-U0411", "P3-U0412", "P3-U0413", "P3-U0414", "P3-U0415", "P3-U0416", "P3-U0417", "P3-U0418" ], "start_char": 36012, "end_char_exclusive": 38686, "exact_source_excerpt": "Mr. Pascal, who is the registered B boat master for your vessel? Um, so with that being said, Daryl is my captain, registered captain, but I think the time I was supposed to reg um, how would I say it? Go to slasper, they was asking me for um, I think a grid two uh, grid two or grid grid three or grid two captain. And then at that point I end up um because I wanted to insure the boat. So I end up calling um Graham Mafra. Graham Mafra I could recall that I end up he has a higher grid than Dariel. So I end up putting him as the captain and I had um Darl as the crew. >> Right. So, you said on the night of the incident? >> Mhm. >> Your regular captain could not go because he went with his own boat. >> Yeah, he went with his own boat. >> Who is your regular captain? >> Well, it's Darla. Daryl what? Daryl Paul. So you're saying in the statement just prior that you could not have registered and inshot the boat >> with Daryl because of his level boat license. Yes, that's >> so you used Graham Matthew. >> Yes. >> However, you continue to use Darl Paul who because of his the level of his license certification >> would not have been accepted as the boat captain. >> Mhm. >> You agree? >> Repeat yourself. >> I am saying you could not have registered Darl Paul >> as the boat captain. >> Yeah. because of the level of his certification. >> Yes, the captain. >> Is that correct? >> Yes. >> That that Slasper and the insurance would not accept Daryl Paul. >> No, no, not the insurance. The insurance accept him. It's just um Slasper. >> So, Slasper would not >> Slasper tell me um my captain need a um license certificate like a grade two or grade whatever. Okay, good. So, Darl Paul did not have that. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. So, you used Graham Matthew >> Mhm. >> to get the boat registered. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> Mhm. >> But yet continued with Darl Paul >> who is not certified. >> He's certified. >> Yeah. But let's go again. >> He's certified and he could he could operate in the waters. >> Okay. So, why? >> They just asked me that. I don't know for what reason. They just tell me um my captain needs like a grid too, but he could operate in the waters. He could operate in the waters. So that is something we we that is something we need some clarity on, Mr. um >> Yes, you could you could clarify with them. He could operate in a waters. He's >> Yeah, but but he's still not registered as your boat captain. >> Repeat yourself. >> He's not registered as your boat captain. >> He's still he's not registered >> as your boat captain. Graham Matthew is the boat master, isn't he? >> Yes, he is. >> Graham Matthew, you have Darl Paul registered as crew. >> Yes, at the time.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-033", "P3-034", "P3-035" ], "caveat": "Names/grades unstable; no full licensing exhibit in supplied text. Graham is not a new separate person when ASR later says Charles.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C33", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Names Daryl Paul as regular captain who took his own boat to the event and was unavailable.", "status": "regular-captain identity", "source": "III P3-034, P3-035 / P3-U0372, P3-U0373, P3-U0374, P3-U0375, P3-U0376, P3-U0377, P3-U0378, P3-U0379, P3-U0380, P3-U0381, P3-U0382, P3-U0383, P3-U0384, P3-U0385, P3-U0386, P3-U0387, P3-U0388, P3-U0389, P3-U0390, P3-U0391, P3-U0392, P3-U0393, P3-U0394, P3-U0395, P3-U0396, P3-U0397, P3-U0398, P3-U0399, P3-U0400, P3-U0401, P3-U0402, P3-U0403, P3-U0404, P3-U0405, P3-U0406, P3-U0407, P3-U0408, P3-U0409, P3-U0410, P3-U0411, P3-U0412, P3-U0413, P3-U0414, P3-U0415, P3-U0416, P3-U0417, P3-U0418, P3-U0419, P3-U0420, P3-U0421", "source_anchor": "P3-034", "caveat": "Daryl is distinct from Tyrone Paul aboard Ocean Angel; do not merge surnames into identity.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Right. So, you said on the night of the incident? >> Mhm. >> Your regular captain could not go because he went with his own boat. >> Yeah, he went with his own boat. >> Who is your regular captain? >> Well, it's Darla. Daryl what? Daryl Paul. So you're saying in the statement just prior that you could not have registered and inshot the boat >> with Daryl because of his level boat license. Yes, that's >> so you used Graham Matthew. >> Yes. >> However, you continue to use Darl Paul who because of his the level of his license certification >> would not have been accepted as the boat captain. >> Mhm. >> You agree? >> Repeat yourself. >> I am saying you could not have registered Darl Paul >> as the boat captain. >> Yeah. because of the level of his certification. >> Yes, the captain. >> Is that correct? >> Yes. >> That that Slasper and the insurance would not accept Daryl Paul. >> No, no, not the insurance. The insurance accept him. It's just um Slasper. >> So, Slasper would not >> Slasper tell me um my captain need a um license certificate like a grade two or grade whatever. Okay, good. So, Darl Paul did not have that. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. So, you used Graham Matthew >> Mhm. >> to get the boat registered. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> Mhm. >> But yet continued with Darl Paul >> who is not certified. >> He's certified. >> Yeah. But let's go again. >> He's certified and he could he could operate in the waters. >> Okay. So, why? >> They just asked me that. I don't know for what reason. They just tell me um my captain needs like a grid too, but he could operate in the waters. He could operate in the waters. So that is something we we that is something we need some clarity on, Mr. um >> Yes, you could you could clarify with them. He could operate in a waters. He's >> Yeah, but but he's still not registered as your boat captain. >> Repeat yourself. >> He's not registered as your boat captain. >> He's still he's not registered >> as your boat captain. Graham Matthew is the boat master, isn't he? >> Yes, he is. >> Graham Matthew, you have Darl Paul registered as crew. >> Yes, at the time. >> Therefore, >> Mhm. >> he cannot be your regular captain. ", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C33", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "regular-captain identity", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Names Daryl Paul as regular captain who took his own boat to the event and was unavailable.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0372", "P3-U0373", "P3-U0374", "P3-U0375", "P3-U0376", "P3-U0377", "P3-U0378", "P3-U0379", "P3-U0380", "P3-U0381", "P3-U0382", "P3-U0383", "P3-U0384", "P3-U0385", "P3-U0386", "P3-U0387", "P3-U0388", "P3-U0389", "P3-U0390", "P3-U0391", "P3-U0392", "P3-U0393", "P3-U0394", "P3-U0395", "P3-U0396", "P3-U0397", "P3-U0398", "P3-U0399", "P3-U0400", "P3-U0401", "P3-U0402", "P3-U0403", "P3-U0404", "P3-U0405", "P3-U0406", "P3-U0407", "P3-U0408", "P3-U0409", "P3-U0410", "P3-U0411", "P3-U0412", "P3-U0413", "P3-U0414", "P3-U0415", "P3-U0416", "P3-U0417", "P3-U0418", "P3-U0419", "P3-U0420", "P3-U0421" ], "start_char": 36583, "end_char_exclusive": 38747, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Right. So, you said on the night of the incident? >> Mhm. >> Your regular captain could not go because he went with his own boat. >> Yeah, he went with his own boat. >> Who is your regular captain? >> Well, it's Darla. Daryl what? Daryl Paul. So you're saying in the statement just prior that you could not have registered and inshot the boat >> with Daryl because of his level boat license. Yes, that's >> so you used Graham Matthew. >> Yes. >> However, you continue to use Darl Paul who because of his the level of his license certification >> would not have been accepted as the boat captain. >> Mhm. >> You agree? >> Repeat yourself. >> I am saying you could not have registered Darl Paul >> as the boat captain. >> Yeah. because of the level of his certification. >> Yes, the captain. >> Is that correct? >> Yes. >> That that Slasper and the insurance would not accept Daryl Paul. >> No, no, not the insurance. The insurance accept him. It's just um Slasper. >> So, Slasper would not >> Slasper tell me um my captain need a um license certificate like a grade two or grade whatever. Okay, good. So, Darl Paul did not have that. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. So, you used Graham Matthew >> Mhm. >> to get the boat registered. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> Mhm. >> But yet continued with Darl Paul >> who is not certified. >> He's certified. >> Yeah. But let's go again. >> He's certified and he could he could operate in the waters. >> Okay. So, why? >> They just asked me that. I don't know for what reason. They just tell me um my captain needs like a grid too, but he could operate in the waters. He could operate in the waters. So that is something we we that is something we need some clarity on, Mr. um >> Yes, you could you could clarify with them. He could operate in a waters. He's >> Yeah, but but he's still not registered as your boat captain. >> Repeat yourself. >> He's not registered as your boat captain. >> He's still he's not registered >> as your boat captain. Graham Matthew is the boat master, isn't he? >> Yes, he is. >> Graham Matthew, you have Darl Paul registered as crew. >> Yes, at the time. >> Therefore, >> Mhm. >> he cannot be your regular captain. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-034", "P3-035" ], "caveat": "Daryl is distinct from Tyrone Paul aboard Ocean Angel; do not merge surnames into identity.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C34", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Clarifies that SLASPA, not his insurer, objected to Daryl's grade; says insurer accepted him.", "status": "regulator versus insurer account", "source": "III P3-034 / P3-U0392, P3-U0393, P3-U0394, P3-U0395", "source_anchor": "P3-034", "caveat": "SLASPA and insurer have not responded in Part III; original correspondence and policy schedule needed.", "exact_excerpt": "That that Slasper and the insurance would not accept Daryl Paul. >> No, no, not the insurance. The insurance accept him. It's just um Slasper. >> So, Slasper would not >> Slasper tell me um my captain need a um license certificate like a grade two or grade whatever. Okay, good. So, Darl Paul did not have that.", "epistemic_status": "unverified_institutional_account", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C34", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "regulator versus insurer account", "epistemic_status": "unverified_institutional_account", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Clarifies that SLASPA, not his insurer, objected to Daryl's grade; says insurer accepted him.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0392", "P3-U0393", "P3-U0394", "P3-U0395" ], "start_char": 37407, "end_char_exclusive": 37718, "exact_source_excerpt": "That that Slasper and the insurance would not accept Daryl Paul. >> No, no, not the insurance. The insurance accept him. It's just um Slasper. >> So, Slasper would not >> Slasper tell me um my captain need a um license certificate like a grade two or grade whatever. Okay, good. So, Darl Paul did not have that.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-034" ], "caveat": "SLASPA and insurer have not responded in Part III; original correspondence and policy schedule needed.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C35", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Continued to use Daryl as regular captain although named as crew; insists Daryl had a licence and could operate on the water.", "status": "continued-use admission and disputed legal understanding", "source": "III P3-035, P3-036, P3-037 / P3-U0396, P3-U0397, P3-U0398, P3-U0399, P3-U0400, P3-U0401, P3-U0402, P3-U0403, P3-U0404, P3-U0405, P3-U0406, P3-U0407, P3-U0408, P3-U0409, P3-U0410, P3-U0411, P3-U0412, P3-U0413, P3-U0414, P3-U0415, P3-U0416, P3-U0417, P3-U0418, P3-U0419, P3-U0420, P3-U0421, P3-U0422, P3-U0423, P3-U0424, P3-U0425, P3-U0426, P3-U0427, P3-U0428, P3-U0429, P3-U0430, P3-U0431, P3-U0432, P3-U0433, P3-U0434, P3-U0435, P3-U0436, P3-U0437, P3-U0438, P3-U0439, P3-U0440, P3-U0441, P3-U0442, P3-U0443, P3-U0444, P3-U0445, P3-U0446, P3-U0447, P3-U0448, P3-U0449, P3-U0450, P3-U0451", "source_anchor": "P3-035", "caveat": "Holding some licence is distinct from authority for this vessel/voyage. Do not describe him as never licensed.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Yeah. >> Yeah. So, you used Graham Matthew >> Mhm. >> to get the boat registered. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> Mhm. >> But yet continued with Darl Paul >> who is not certified. >> He's certified. >> Yeah. But let's go again. >> He's certified and he could he could operate in the waters. >> Okay. So, why? >> They just asked me that. I don't know for what reason. They just tell me um my captain needs like a grid too, but he could operate in the waters. He could operate in the waters. So that is something we we that is something we need some clarity on, Mr. um >> Yes, you could you could clarify with them. He could operate in a waters. He's >> Yeah, but but he's still not registered as your boat captain. >> Repeat yourself. >> He's not registered as your boat captain. >> He's still he's not registered >> as your boat captain. Graham Matthew is the boat master, isn't he? >> Yes, he is. >> Graham Matthew, you have Darl Paul registered as crew. >> Yes, at the time. >> Therefore, >> Mhm. >> he cannot be your regular captain. >> And he is, >> but he's not registered as your boat captain. >> Yes, but he's not registered. But he's legit. He could still run in the water. I am still asking if he was legit why would Slasp refuse him. >> You asked that question to you would take that into um Slash bags them why that you all have to make that research. I don't know. I don't know for what reason they told me such >> yeah he has yeah he would >> that's not a question I could answer why. >> So yeah but Darl Mafi Darl Paul >> Paul has a boat license. Yeah, he's like, >> but not at a level that's last accepted. >> He he has a level three, I think. >> I don't know what level they accept you to drive at cuz I've never gone to a boat captain license, but I know for sure you do have a license. >> Okay, so it says Graham Matthew certified boat license grade 3 expiry date 289 2026. So it means therefore that what certified crew won. So it means therefore that whatever whatever level of certification that Darl Paul has is is lower or of lesser certification than Graham Matthew >> but he can still operate. That's what I'm saying. My interest here is why would Slasper not have registered him as your boat master? >> But that question I cannot answer that question. You have to ask Slasper. They do the laws. I don't know. >> So I am still saying owing to the fact that Daryl Paul is not registered as your boat master. >> He cannot be your regular captain >> or should not be your regular captain or cannot be. I think I used the right term in the first instance. He cannot be your regular boat captain. >> Yep. >> Are you agreeing with me? >> That's the law and I agree. >> But I know once you have a a a captain like >> So So you are saying that Darl Paul has his own boat. >> Bigger P. >> Darl Paul has his own boat. >> Yeah, you do have a boat right now. >> He owns a boat. >> Yeah, he has. >> And he captains his boat. >> Well, yeah, he has a boat. You have seen him captain his own boat. >> Well, a dingy has how you call it those small mini boats. Those dingies. That's what ", "epistemic_status": "admission_plus_disputed_legal_understanding", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C35", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "continued-use admission and disputed legal understanding", "epistemic_status": "admission_plus_disputed_legal_understanding", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Continued to use Daryl as regular captain although named as crew; insists Daryl had a licence and could operate on the water.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0396", "P3-U0397", "P3-U0398", "P3-U0399", "P3-U0400", "P3-U0401", "P3-U0402", "P3-U0403", "P3-U0404", "P3-U0405", "P3-U0406", "P3-U0407", "P3-U0408", "P3-U0409", "P3-U0410", "P3-U0411", "P3-U0412", "P3-U0413", "P3-U0414", "P3-U0415", "P3-U0416", "P3-U0417", "P3-U0418", "P3-U0419", "P3-U0420", "P3-U0421", "P3-U0422", "P3-U0423", "P3-U0424", "P3-U0425", "P3-U0426", "P3-U0427", "P3-U0428", "P3-U0429", "P3-U0430", "P3-U0431", "P3-U0432", "P3-U0433", "P3-U0434", "P3-U0435", "P3-U0436", "P3-U0437", "P3-U0438", "P3-U0439", "P3-U0440", "P3-U0441", "P3-U0442", "P3-U0443", "P3-U0444", "P3-U0445", "P3-U0446", "P3-U0447", "P3-U0448", "P3-U0449", "P3-U0450", "P3-U0451" ], "start_char": 37719, "end_char_exclusive": 40805, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Yeah. >> Yeah. So, you used Graham Matthew >> Mhm. >> to get the boat registered. >> Mhm. >> Yeah. >> Mhm. >> But yet continued with Darl Paul >> who is not certified. >> He's certified. >> Yeah. But let's go again. >> He's certified and he could he could operate in the waters. >> Okay. So, why? >> They just asked me that. I don't know for what reason. They just tell me um my captain needs like a grid too, but he could operate in the waters. He could operate in the waters. So that is something we we that is something we need some clarity on, Mr. um >> Yes, you could you could clarify with them. He could operate in a waters. He's >> Yeah, but but he's still not registered as your boat captain. >> Repeat yourself. >> He's not registered as your boat captain. >> He's still he's not registered >> as your boat captain. Graham Matthew is the boat master, isn't he? >> Yes, he is. >> Graham Matthew, you have Darl Paul registered as crew. >> Yes, at the time. >> Therefore, >> Mhm. >> he cannot be your regular captain. >> And he is, >> but he's not registered as your boat captain. >> Yes, but he's not registered. But he's legit. He could still run in the water. I am still asking if he was legit why would Slasp refuse him. >> You asked that question to you would take that into um Slash bags them why that you all have to make that research. I don't know. I don't know for what reason they told me such >> yeah he has yeah he would >> that's not a question I could answer why. >> So yeah but Darl Mafi Darl Paul >> Paul has a boat license. Yeah, he's like, >> but not at a level that's last accepted. >> He he has a level three, I think. >> I don't know what level they accept you to drive at cuz I've never gone to a boat captain license, but I know for sure you do have a license. >> Okay, so it says Graham Matthew certified boat license grade 3 expiry date 289 2026. So it means therefore that what certified crew won. So it means therefore that whatever whatever level of certification that Darl Paul has is is lower or of lesser certification than Graham Matthew >> but he can still operate. That's what I'm saying. My interest here is why would Slasper not have registered him as your boat master? >> But that question I cannot answer that question. You have to ask Slasper. They do the laws. I don't know. >> So I am still saying owing to the fact that Daryl Paul is not registered as your boat master. >> He cannot be your regular captain >> or should not be your regular captain or cannot be. I think I used the right term in the first instance. He cannot be your regular boat captain. >> Yep. >> Are you agreeing with me? >> That's the law and I agree. >> But I know once you have a a a captain like >> So So you are saying that Darl Paul has his own boat. >> Bigger P. >> Darl Paul has his own boat. >> Yeah, you do have a boat right now. >> He owns a boat. >> Yeah, he has. >> And he captains his boat. >> Well, yeah, he has a boat. You have seen him captain his own boat. >> Well, a dingy has how you call it those small mini boats. Those dingies. That's what ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-035", "P3-036", "P3-037" ], "caveat": "Holding some licence is distinct from authority for this vessel/voyage. Do not describe him as never licensed.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C36", "part": "III", "speaker": "Commissioner readout; Pascal", "statement": "Questioner reads Graham Matthew certified Boatmaster grade 3, expiry 28 September 2026; Pascal thinks Daryl has grade 3 while recalling request for grade 2.", "status": "licence document readout and uncertainty", "source": "III P3-036, P3-037 / P3-U0422, P3-U0423, P3-U0424, P3-U0425, P3-U0426, P3-U0427, P3-U0428, P3-U0429, P3-U0430, P3-U0431, P3-U0432, P3-U0433, P3-U0434, P3-U0435, P3-U0436, P3-U0437, P3-U0438, P3-U0439, P3-U0440, P3-U0441, P3-U0442, P3-U0443, P3-U0444, P3-U0445, P3-U0446, P3-U0447, P3-U0448, P3-U0449, P3-U0450, P3-U0451", "source_anchor": "P3-036", "caveat": "Grade details internally unstable. The readout is not an inspected exhibit; do not infer a settled grade hierarchy.", "exact_excerpt": ">> And he is, >> but he's not registered as your boat captain. >> Yes, but he's not registered. But he's legit. He could still run in the water. I am still asking if he was legit why would Slasp refuse him. >> You asked that question to you would take that into um Slash bags them why that you all have to make that research. I don't know. I don't know for what reason they told me such >> yeah he has yeah he would >> that's not a question I could answer why. >> So yeah but Darl Mafi Darl Paul >> Paul has a boat license. Yeah, he's like, >> but not at a level that's last accepted. >> He he has a level three, I think. >> I don't know what level they accept you to drive at cuz I've never gone to a boat captain license, but I know for sure you do have a license. >> Okay, so it says Graham Matthew certified boat license grade 3 expiry date 289 2026. So it means therefore that what certified crew won. So it means therefore that whatever whatever level of certification that Darl Paul has is is lower or of lesser certification than Graham Matthew >> but he can still operate. That's what I'm saying. My interest here is why would Slasper not have registered him as your boat master? >> But that question I cannot answer that question. You have to ask Slasper. They do the laws. I don't know. >> So I am still saying owing to the fact that Daryl Paul is not registered as your boat master. >> He cannot be your regular captain >> or should not be your regular captain or cannot be. I think I used the right term in the first instance. He cannot be your regular boat captain. >> Yep. >> Are you agreeing with me? >> That's the law and I agree. >> But I know once you have a a a captain like >> So So you are saying that Darl Paul has his own boat. >> Bigger P. >> Darl Paul has his own boat. >> Yeah, you do have a boat right now. >> He owns a boat. >> Yeah, he has. >> And he captains his boat. >> Well, yeah, he has a boat. You have seen him captain his own boat. >> Well, a dingy has how you call it those small mini boats. Those dingies. That's what ", "epistemic_status": "document_readout", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for role; named questioner uncertain", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C36", "source_part": 3, "person": "Commissioner readout; Pascal", "evidence_category": "licence document readout and uncertainty", "epistemic_status": "document_readout", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for role; named questioner uncertain", "statement": "Questioner reads Graham Matthew certified Boatmaster grade 3, expiry 28 September 2026; Pascal thinks Daryl has grade 3 while recalling request for grade 2.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0422", "P3-U0423", "P3-U0424", "P3-U0425", "P3-U0426", "P3-U0427", "P3-U0428", "P3-U0429", "P3-U0430", "P3-U0431", "P3-U0432", "P3-U0433", "P3-U0434", "P3-U0435", "P3-U0436", "P3-U0437", "P3-U0438", "P3-U0439", "P3-U0440", "P3-U0441", "P3-U0442", "P3-U0443", "P3-U0444", "P3-U0445", "P3-U0446", "P3-U0447", "P3-U0448", "P3-U0449", "P3-U0450", "P3-U0451" ], "start_char": 38747, "end_char_exclusive": 40805, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> And he is, >> but he's not registered as your boat captain. >> Yes, but he's not registered. But he's legit. He could still run in the water. I am still asking if he was legit why would Slasp refuse him. >> You asked that question to you would take that into um Slash bags them why that you all have to make that research. I don't know. I don't know for what reason they told me such >> yeah he has yeah he would >> that's not a question I could answer why. >> So yeah but Darl Mafi Darl Paul >> Paul has a boat license. Yeah, he's like, >> but not at a level that's last accepted. >> He he has a level three, I think. >> I don't know what level they accept you to drive at cuz I've never gone to a boat captain license, but I know for sure you do have a license. >> Okay, so it says Graham Matthew certified boat license grade 3 expiry date 289 2026. So it means therefore that what certified crew won. So it means therefore that whatever whatever level of certification that Darl Paul has is is lower or of lesser certification than Graham Matthew >> but he can still operate. That's what I'm saying. My interest here is why would Slasper not have registered him as your boat master? >> But that question I cannot answer that question. You have to ask Slasper. They do the laws. I don't know. >> So I am still saying owing to the fact that Daryl Paul is not registered as your boat master. >> He cannot be your regular captain >> or should not be your regular captain or cannot be. I think I used the right term in the first instance. He cannot be your regular boat captain. >> Yep. >> Are you agreeing with me? >> That's the law and I agree. >> But I know once you have a a a captain like >> So So you are saying that Darl Paul has his own boat. >> Bigger P. >> Darl Paul has his own boat. >> Yeah, you do have a boat right now. >> He owns a boat. >> Yeah, he has. >> And he captains his boat. >> Well, yeah, he has a boat. You have seen him captain his own boat. >> Well, a dingy has how you call it those small mini boats. Those dingies. That's what ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-036", "P3-037" ], "caveat": "Grade details internally unstable. The readout is not an inspected exhibit; do not infer a settled grade hierarchy.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C37", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says Daryl supplied licence, was listed for two–three years without SLASPA issue, appears on insurance, and the same boat was not upgraded.", "status": "historical regulator account", "source": "III P3-038 / P3-U0454, P3-U0455, P3-U0456, P3-U0457, P3-U0458", "source_anchor": "P3-038", "caveat": "Requires dated applications, conditions, endorsements and regulator response; possible change of requirements not established.", "exact_excerpt": "Cuz he works for me is present. He had to present it to me for me to send to Slasper. I've registered my boat as Darl Paul as my captain with no issue with Slasper. I just just recently they just tell me that um Darl will need a higher grade or whatever they said. But I've always Daryl have been my captain for two three years with no issue. He's been the one on my insurance as the captain and you could check the files. >> And we and we talking about the same vessel. >> Yes. >> An upgrade to your vessel that would have caused you to ask him for an upgrading license. >> No, cuz Junior I haven't upgraded my boat. That's the only boat I've I've bought and that's the only boat I have right now. So how would it be upgraded? Daryl Paul have been my captain for two three years now. From the time I started operating, Daryl has been the one as the captain.", "epistemic_status": "unverified_institutional_account", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C37", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "historical regulator account", "epistemic_status": "unverified_institutional_account", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says Daryl supplied licence, was listed for two–three years without SLASPA issue, appears on insurance, and the same boat was not upgraded.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0454", "P3-U0455", "P3-U0456", "P3-U0457", "P3-U0458" ], "start_char": 41137, "end_char_exclusive": 41995, "exact_source_excerpt": "Cuz he works for me is present. He had to present it to me for me to send to Slasper. I've registered my boat as Darl Paul as my captain with no issue with Slasper. I just just recently they just tell me that um Darl will need a higher grade or whatever they said. But I've always Daryl have been my captain for two three years with no issue. He's been the one on my insurance as the captain and you could check the files. >> And we and we talking about the same vessel. >> Yes. >> An upgrade to your vessel that would have caused you to ask him for an upgrading license. >> No, cuz Junior I haven't upgraded my boat. That's the only boat I've I've bought and that's the only boat I have right now. So how would it be upgraded? Daryl Paul have been my captain for two three years now. From the time I started operating, Daryl has been the one as the captain.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-038" ], "caveat": "Requires dated applications, conditions, endorsements and regulator response; possible change of requirements not established.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C38", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Despite describing SLASPA declining Daryl as named master, accepted continued use of him because he believed his licence allowed it.", "status": "continued-operation acknowledgement", "source": "III P3-039, P3-040 / P3-U0459, P3-U0460, P3-U0461, P3-U0462, P3-U0463, P3-U0464, P3-U0465, P3-U0466, P3-U0467, P3-U0468, P3-U0469, P3-U0470, P3-U0471, P3-U0472, P3-U0473, P3-U0474, P3-U0475, P3-U0476, P3-U0477, P3-U0478, P3-U0479, P3-U0480, P3-U0481, P3-U0482, P3-U0483, P3-U0484", "source_anchor": "P3-039", "caveat": "No final finding of legal breach or regulator negligence; distinguish personal understanding from authority.", "exact_excerpt": ">> did not register him as your captain as a captain because he he was not to the requisite grade. >> Well, >> isn't that what you said? Yes, that's what that's what they said. >> Yeah, that's what you told us. We haven't we haven't heard from Slasbar. We're hearing from you >> and you are saying that Slasbar would not register him as your boat captain because he did not have the required level of certification. >> Well, that's well I that's what I assume. Yes, that's what they said. >> And yet despite Slasper not registering him as captain because he did not have the required level of certification, you engaged him as your captain. >> Yes. because he do have a license to operate and he has the license to operate in the waters as well. That's what I'm saying. >> Yes. But Slasper declined to register him as a boat captain. >> Mhm. >> Because he did not have the required level of certification. >> Mhm. >> That is what you have said. I have not I've not said so. But despite that you felt comfortable engaging him as a captain despite what Slasper which is the authority on those matters. >> Let me let me add to that. >> Just just hold on. Despite what Slasper has said which is the authority on those matters. It's okay. I mean he's been driving your boat so it's okay. He can continue to do that notwithstanding that Slasper has declined to register him. >> Yes. >> I mean Mr. Pascal what I you have to take this thing very seriously you know. >> Yes but I am but what I'm >> like your livelihood might depend on it people lives might depend on it not livelihood lives >> and I I do happen to find you a little casual >> given the enormity of the situation that we're dealing with further question. So again, let me let me just warn you that Graham Matthews boat license has expired on the 28th of September this year. >> Mhm. I'm not aware of it. Yeah, I'm just telling you now >> cuz he's >> the the the the other discrepancy I notice here, the expiration date of your >> certificate of inspection is November 22nd, 2026, >> which is next month. But yet the boat license of the captain expires before that. ", "epistemic_status": "admission_plus_disputed_legal_understanding", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C38", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "continued-operation acknowledgement", "epistemic_status": "admission_plus_disputed_legal_understanding", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Despite describing SLASPA declining Daryl as named master, accepted continued use of him because he believed his licence allowed it.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0459", "P3-U0460", "P3-U0461", "P3-U0462", "P3-U0463", "P3-U0464", "P3-U0465", "P3-U0466", "P3-U0467", "P3-U0468", "P3-U0469", "P3-U0470", "P3-U0471", "P3-U0472", "P3-U0473", "P3-U0474", "P3-U0475", "P3-U0476", "P3-U0477", "P3-U0478", "P3-U0479", "P3-U0480", "P3-U0481", "P3-U0482", "P3-U0483", "P3-U0484" ], "start_char": 42039, "end_char_exclusive": 44162, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> did not register him as your captain as a captain because he he was not to the requisite grade. >> Well, >> isn't that what you said? Yes, that's what that's what they said. >> Yeah, that's what you told us. We haven't we haven't heard from Slasbar. We're hearing from you >> and you are saying that Slasbar would not register him as your boat captain because he did not have the required level of certification. >> Well, that's well I that's what I assume. Yes, that's what they said. >> And yet despite Slasper not registering him as captain because he did not have the required level of certification, you engaged him as your captain. >> Yes. because he do have a license to operate and he has the license to operate in the waters as well. That's what I'm saying. >> Yes. But Slasper declined to register him as a boat captain. >> Mhm. >> Because he did not have the required level of certification. >> Mhm. >> That is what you have said. I have not I've not said so. But despite that you felt comfortable engaging him as a captain despite what Slasper which is the authority on those matters. >> Let me let me add to that. >> Just just hold on. Despite what Slasper has said which is the authority on those matters. It's okay. I mean he's been driving your boat so it's okay. He can continue to do that notwithstanding that Slasper has declined to register him. >> Yes. >> I mean Mr. Pascal what I you have to take this thing very seriously you know. >> Yes but I am but what I'm >> like your livelihood might depend on it people lives might depend on it not livelihood lives >> and I I do happen to find you a little casual >> given the enormity of the situation that we're dealing with further question. So again, let me let me just warn you that Graham Matthews boat license has expired on the 28th of September this year. >> Mhm. I'm not aware of it. Yeah, I'm just telling you now >> cuz he's >> the the the the other discrepancy I notice here, the expiration date of your >> certificate of inspection is November 22nd, 2026, >> which is next month. But yet the boat license of the captain expires before that. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-039", "P3-040" ], "caveat": "No final finding of legal breach or regulator negligence; distinguish personal understanding from authority.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C39", "part": "III", "speaker": "Commissioner and Chair", "statement": "Graham licence said expired 28 September 2026; vessel inspection certificate said expires 22 November 2026; chair notes driver/craft document expiries need not coincide.", "status": "licence/certificate dates readout", "source": "III P3-040, P3-041 / P3-U0472, P3-U0473, P3-U0474, P3-U0475, P3-U0476, P3-U0477, P3-U0478, P3-U0479, P3-U0480, P3-U0481, P3-U0482, P3-U0483, P3-U0484, P3-U0485, P3-U0486, P3-U0487, P3-U0488, P3-U0489, P3-U0490, P3-U0491, P3-U0492, P3-U0493, P3-U0494, P3-U0495, P3-U0496", "source_anchor": "P3-040", "caveat": "Graham date falls AFTER 18 July collision; this passage does not prove he lacked a valid licence then. Non-matching dates alone are not defect.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Let me let me add to that. >> Just just hold on. Despite what Slasper has said which is the authority on those matters. It's okay. I mean he's been driving your boat so it's okay. He can continue to do that notwithstanding that Slasper has declined to register him. >> Yes. >> I mean Mr. Pascal what I you have to take this thing very seriously you know. >> Yes but I am but what I'm >> like your livelihood might depend on it people lives might depend on it not livelihood lives >> and I I do happen to find you a little casual >> given the enormity of the situation that we're dealing with further question. So again, let me let me just warn you that Graham Matthews boat license has expired on the 28th of September this year. >> Mhm. I'm not aware of it. Yeah, I'm just telling you now >> cuz he's >> the the the the other discrepancy I notice here, the expiration date of your >> certificate of inspection is November 22nd, 2026, >> which is next month. But yet the boat license of the captain expires before that. >> Mhm. The boat captain's license expired last month, September, but the his boat is licensed or certified until November 22nd, which is next month. >> But that's why I'm saying Graham, we just >> we use I just use Graham. Graham is not my captain. He never drives for me. >> So, Mr. In your estimation, can can that happen that the boat is allowed to be certified until but the captain >> it can happen? But it's like my it's it's like my car it's like my car being insured or they don't run commensurate. They don't usually they can't run commensurate. The >> driver's license expire can expire before the insurance. Yeah. But but you need to check on Mr. Louis on Mr. Graham Matthew. >> Make a pan. >> You need to check on Mr. Graham Matthew because his his license expired last month. >> You need to check on him. >> You the captain in your boat. >> But no, he Graham Charles. I used Graham Charles. I've never used Graham Charles to drive my boat. You just use his name to get your license. >> Yes. ", "epistemic_status": "document_readout_and_procedural_comment", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for readout; chair intervention contextual", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C39", "source_part": 3, "person": "Commissioner and Chair", "evidence_category": "licence/certificate dates readout", "epistemic_status": "document_readout_and_procedural_comment", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for readout; chair intervention contextual", "statement": "Graham licence said expired 28 September 2026; vessel inspection certificate said expires 22 November 2026; chair notes driver/craft document expiries need not coincide.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0472", "P3-U0473", "P3-U0474", "P3-U0475", "P3-U0476", "P3-U0477", "P3-U0478", "P3-U0479", "P3-U0480", "P3-U0481", "P3-U0482", "P3-U0483", "P3-U0484", "P3-U0485", "P3-U0486", "P3-U0487", "P3-U0488", "P3-U0489", "P3-U0490", "P3-U0491", "P3-U0492", "P3-U0493", "P3-U0494", "P3-U0495", "P3-U0496" ], "start_char": 43139, "end_char_exclusive": 45167, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Let me let me add to that. >> Just just hold on. Despite what Slasper has said which is the authority on those matters. It's okay. I mean he's been driving your boat so it's okay. He can continue to do that notwithstanding that Slasper has declined to register him. >> Yes. >> I mean Mr. Pascal what I you have to take this thing very seriously you know. >> Yes but I am but what I'm >> like your livelihood might depend on it people lives might depend on it not livelihood lives >> and I I do happen to find you a little casual >> given the enormity of the situation that we're dealing with further question. So again, let me let me just warn you that Graham Matthews boat license has expired on the 28th of September this year. >> Mhm. I'm not aware of it. Yeah, I'm just telling you now >> cuz he's >> the the the the other discrepancy I notice here, the expiration date of your >> certificate of inspection is November 22nd, 2026, >> which is next month. But yet the boat license of the captain expires before that. >> Mhm. The boat captain's license expired last month, September, but the his boat is licensed or certified until November 22nd, which is next month. >> But that's why I'm saying Graham, we just >> we use I just use Graham. Graham is not my captain. He never drives for me. >> So, Mr. In your estimation, can can that happen that the boat is allowed to be certified until but the captain >> it can happen? But it's like my it's it's like my car it's like my car being insured or they don't run commensurate. They don't usually they can't run commensurate. The >> driver's license expire can expire before the insurance. Yeah. But but you need to check on Mr. Louis on Mr. Graham Matthew. >> Make a pan. >> You need to check on Mr. Graham Matthew because his his license expired last month. >> You need to check on him. >> You the captain in your boat. >> But no, he Graham Charles. I used Graham Charles. I've never used Graham Charles to drive my boat. You just use his name to get your license. >> Yes. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-040", "P3-041" ], "caveat": "Graham date falls AFTER 18 July collision; this passage does not prove he lacked a valid licence then. Non-matching dates alone are not defect.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C40", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Explicitly says Graham never drove his boat and he used Graham's name to obtain certification/licence.", "status": "nominal-master arrangement admission", "source": "III P3-041, P3-042 / P3-U0486, P3-U0487, P3-U0488, P3-U0489, P3-U0490, P3-U0491, P3-U0492, P3-U0493, P3-U0494, P3-U0495, P3-U0496, P3-U0497, P3-U0498, P3-U0499", "source_anchor": "P3-041", "caveat": "Significant admission, but intent to defraud, Graham knowledge/consent, authenticity and legal conclusion unestablished. Graham Charles wording probably name drift, requires recording.", "exact_excerpt": "But that's why I'm saying Graham, we just >> we use I just use Graham. Graham is not my captain. He never drives for me. >> So, Mr. In your estimation, can can that happen that the boat is allowed to be certified until but the captain >> it can happen? But it's like my it's it's like my car it's like my car being insured or they don't run commensurate. They don't usually they can't run commensurate. The >> driver's license expire can expire before the insurance. Yeah. But but you need to check on Mr. Louis on Mr. Graham Matthew. >> Make a pan. >> You need to check on Mr. Graham Matthew because his his license expired last month. >> You need to check on him. >> You the captain in your boat. >> But no, he Graham Charles. I used Graham Charles. I've never used Graham Charles to drive my boat. You just use his name to get your license. >> Yes. >> But you never use it. >> You never drive that boat. >> You never use him to actually do what you in the put on the the phone. just use his name. I, you know, I just use his name. I He never drive my boat.", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C40", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "nominal-master arrangement admission", "epistemic_status": "admission", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Explicitly says Graham never drove his boat and he used Graham's name to obtain certification/licence.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0486", "P3-U0487", "P3-U0488", "P3-U0489", "P3-U0490", "P3-U0491", "P3-U0492", "P3-U0493", "P3-U0494", "P3-U0495", "P3-U0496", "P3-U0497", "P3-U0498", "P3-U0499" ], "start_char": 44315, "end_char_exclusive": 45374, "exact_source_excerpt": "But that's why I'm saying Graham, we just >> we use I just use Graham. Graham is not my captain. He never drives for me. >> So, Mr. In your estimation, can can that happen that the boat is allowed to be certified until but the captain >> it can happen? But it's like my it's it's like my car it's like my car being insured or they don't run commensurate. They don't usually they can't run commensurate. The >> driver's license expire can expire before the insurance. Yeah. But but you need to check on Mr. Louis on Mr. Graham Matthew. >> Make a pan. >> You need to check on Mr. Graham Matthew because his his license expired last month. >> You need to check on him. >> You the captain in your boat. >> But no, he Graham Charles. I used Graham Charles. I've never used Graham Charles to drive my boat. You just use his name to get your license. >> Yes. >> But you never use it. >> You never drive that boat. >> You never use him to actually do what you in the put on the the phone. just use his name. I, you know, I just use his name. I He never drive my boat.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-041", "P3-042" ], "caveat": "Significant admission, but intent to defraud, Graham knowledge/consent, authenticity and legal conclusion unestablished. Graham Charles wording probably name drift, requires recording.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C41", "part": "III", "speaker": "Commissioner; Pascal answers", "statement": "Document described as stamped 22 May 2026, showing Pascal as lawful owner and Graham Matthew as master; examiner refers to Pascal signature.", "status": "certificate details readout", "source": "III P3-043, P3-044 / P3-U0505, P3-U0506, P3-U0507, P3-U0508, P3-U0509, P3-U0510, P3-U0511, P3-U0512, P3-U0513, P3-U0514, P3-U0515, P3-U0516, P3-U0517, P3-U0518, P3-U0519, P3-U0520, P3-U0521, P3-U0522, P3-U0523, P3-U0524, P3-U0525, P3-U0526, P3-U0527, P3-U0528, P3-U0529, P3-U0530, P3-U0531, P3-U0532, P3-U0533, P3-U0534, P3-U0535, P3-U0536", "source_anchor": "P3-043", "caveat": "Original not supplied; no Pascal signature denial here. This differs from Dylan's separate 23 January signature challenge.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Mhm. >> is not the one operating the vessel. Is that correct? >> Yes. >> I cannot hear you sir. Yes. Right. >> You are also aware that the person who is operating the vessel is not qualified to do so because the sole authority to give that responsibility is Flasper and he was denied. >> You are aware. >> I'm not aware of >> the person operating currently. You are aware that he's not the person because you use the other person to get through. >> Is that correct? >> Repeat. Repeat that statement. >> The person you have Just one second. Let me refer to the documents. Kazola Jr. know that Mr. Hippolit the registered captain. Thank you. according to the the paper from the St. Lucia and support authority the direct the division of maritime affairs right you Irenus Pascal have registered as the master of the vessel the person in charge of that vessel whose lives are dependent upon >> as Grum's Matthew Mhm. >> That's correct. >> Mhm. But you clearly stated that Mr. Matthew is >> important verbally. >> We need to hear. >> Oh, okay. Understood. >> Yeah, I understood. >> Right. So you have on the division of maritime affairs from the St. Lucia and support authority which is commonly called Slasper >> that you are the lawful owner of Kazola Jr. is that correct? Yes, I am. >> You have on that same document stamped the 22nd of May, 2026, that the operator, the master, the person with the responsibility for the nine lives you had >> Mhm. >> on the vessel that night in question >> Mhm. >> was supposed to be Mr. Graham Graham Matthew. >> Mhm. >> Is that correct? >> Well, if that's what stated. Yes. No, that is what you have because your signature is also on that document, remember? >> Yes. >> And you had another individual operating the vessel >> which is not what you have the person you have as the master of the vessel. >> Understood? But you would also be aware that in so doing you would have according to the laws engaging the master the captain of a vessel that by doing so on the 18th of July 2026 that you would have endangered the life of all the sea users and resulting in the death of four individual. I'm listening. It was a question. I thought it you was continuous me. I didn't take it as a question. Thank you. So, I'm still going back to navigational terms with you and I believe Commissioner Defrites was trying to understand what you were not bringing out. Your vessel is equipped with a 115 horsepower 115 or 150. ", "epistemic_status": "document_readout_with_acknowledgement", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for readout; named examiner uncertain", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C41", "source_part": 3, "person": "Commissioner; Pascal answers", "evidence_category": "certificate details readout", "epistemic_status": "document_readout_with_acknowledgement", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for readout; named examiner uncertain", "statement": "Document described as stamped 22 May 2026, showing Pascal as lawful owner and Graham Matthew as master; examiner refers to Pascal signature.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0505", "P3-U0506", "P3-U0507", "P3-U0508", "P3-U0509", "P3-U0510", "P3-U0511", "P3-U0512", "P3-U0513", "P3-U0514", "P3-U0515", "P3-U0516", "P3-U0517", "P3-U0518", "P3-U0519", "P3-U0520", "P3-U0521", "P3-U0522", "P3-U0523", "P3-U0524", "P3-U0525", "P3-U0526", "P3-U0527", "P3-U0528", "P3-U0529", "P3-U0530", "P3-U0531", "P3-U0532", "P3-U0533", "P3-U0534", "P3-U0535", "P3-U0536" ], "start_char": 46396, "end_char_exclusive": 48846, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Mhm. >> is not the one operating the vessel. Is that correct? >> Yes. >> I cannot hear you sir. Yes. Right. >> You are also aware that the person who is operating the vessel is not qualified to do so because the sole authority to give that responsibility is Flasper and he was denied. >> You are aware. >> I'm not aware of >> the person operating currently. You are aware that he's not the person because you use the other person to get through. >> Is that correct? >> Repeat. Repeat that statement. >> The person you have Just one second. Let me refer to the documents. Kazola Jr. know that Mr. Hippolit the registered captain. Thank you. according to the the paper from the St. Lucia and support authority the direct the division of maritime affairs right you Irenus Pascal have registered as the master of the vessel the person in charge of that vessel whose lives are dependent upon >> as Grum's Matthew Mhm. >> That's correct. >> Mhm. But you clearly stated that Mr. Matthew is >> important verbally. >> We need to hear. >> Oh, okay. Understood. >> Yeah, I understood. >> Right. So you have on the division of maritime affairs from the St. Lucia and support authority which is commonly called Slasper >> that you are the lawful owner of Kazola Jr. is that correct? Yes, I am. >> You have on that same document stamped the 22nd of May, 2026, that the operator, the master, the person with the responsibility for the nine lives you had >> Mhm. >> on the vessel that night in question >> Mhm. >> was supposed to be Mr. Graham Graham Matthew. >> Mhm. >> Is that correct? >> Well, if that's what stated. Yes. No, that is what you have because your signature is also on that document, remember? >> Yes. >> And you had another individual operating the vessel >> which is not what you have the person you have as the master of the vessel. >> Understood? But you would also be aware that in so doing you would have according to the laws engaging the master the captain of a vessel that by doing so on the 18th of July 2026 that you would have endangered the life of all the sea users and resulting in the death of four individual. I'm listening. It was a question. I thought it you was continuous me. I didn't take it as a question. Thank you. So, I'm still going back to navigational terms with you and I believe Commissioner Defrites was trying to understand what you were not bringing out. Your vessel is equipped with a 115 horsepower 115 or 150. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-043", "P3-044" ], "caveat": "Original not supplied; no Pascal signature denial here. This differs from Dylan's separate 23 January signature challenge.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C42", "part": "III", "speaker": "Commissioner", "statement": "Examiner suggests using another operator endangered other sea users and resulted in four deaths.", "status": "causation proposition", "source": "III P3-044 / P3-U0536", "source_anchor": "P3-044", "caveat": "Pascal says he was listening and had not understood a question; this is NOT a causation admission or finding.", "exact_excerpt": "But you would also be aware that in so doing you would have according to the laws engaging the master the captain of a vessel that by doing so on the 18th of July 2026 that you would have endangered the life of all the sea users and resulting in the death of four individual. I'm listening. It was a question. I thought it you was continuous me. I didn't take it as a question.", "epistemic_status": "panel_proposition", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high role; named examiner uncertain", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C42", "source_part": 3, "person": "Commissioner", "evidence_category": "causation proposition", "epistemic_status": "panel_proposition", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high role; named examiner uncertain", "statement": "Examiner suggests using another operator endangered other sea users and resulted in four deaths.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0536" ], "start_char": 48250, "end_char_exclusive": 48627, "exact_source_excerpt": "But you would also be aware that in so doing you would have according to the laws engaging the master the captain of a vessel that by doing so on the 18th of July 2026 that you would have endangered the life of all the sea users and resulting in the death of four individual. I'm listening. It was a question. I thought it you was continuous me. I didn't take it as a question.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-044" ], "caveat": "Pascal says he was listening and had not understood a question; this is NOT a causation admission or finding.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C43", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Owner expressly confirms 150-horsepower engine when asked 115 or 150.", "status": "vessel specification confirmation", "source": "III P3-044, P3-045 / P3-U0536, P3-U0537, P3-U0538, P3-U0539", "source_anchor": "P3-044", "caveat": "Upgrades Part II garbled specification to clear owner testimony; still not documentary engine make/model verification.", "exact_excerpt": "Your vessel is equipped with a 115 horsepower 115 or 150. >> 150 >> 150. >> Yes.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C43", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "vessel specification confirmation", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Owner expressly confirms 150-horsepower engine when asked 115 or 150.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0536", "P3-U0537", "P3-U0538", "P3-U0539" ], "start_char": 48788, "end_char_exclusive": 48868, "exact_source_excerpt": "Your vessel is equipped with a 115 horsepower 115 or 150. >> 150 >> 150. >> Yes.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-044", "P3-045" ], "caveat": "Upgrades Part II garbled specification to clear owner testimony; still not documentary engine make/model verification.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C44", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Corrects fifty-minutes-to-hour estimate as starting at slowdown near Windjammer; separately estimates departure about 10:45 and impact around 11:55, about an hour-plus including stop.", "status": "time-interval correction", "source": "III P3-045, P3-046 / P3-U0540, P3-U0541, P3-U0542, P3-U0543, P3-U0544, P3-U0545, P3-U0546, P3-U0547, P3-U0548, P3-U0549, P3-U0550, P3-U0551, P3-U0552, P3-U0553, P3-U0554, P3-U0555, P3-U0556, P3-U0557, P3-U0558, P3-U0559, P3-U0560", "source_anchor": "P3-045", "caveat": "Approximate recollection; collision time later attributed to what others said. Not measured chronology.", "exact_excerpt": "You clearly indicated to commissioner defes that you took about 50. Just one second. 50 to an hour. >> 50 to 1 hour from when I tell the guy to stop. That's after not from the destination to the collision. >> So we for the records we want to indicate that >> from win jama to the collision. >> Yeah. You didn't ask that question. You only asked after I told the guy to um um um take it easy. That's where that's the question you asked. You never asked me from the destination to the collision how long I took. >> We we are getting there. We getting there. What was that? I thought >> So for the purpose of this sitting, we would label um Rodney Bay as point A. >> Mhm. >> We would register the point of the collision as point B. >> Mhm. >> For clear guidance. So from point A to point B, how long did your vessel take to travel that distance? >> Um your own estimate. >> We left we left around a little like after 10 collision happened around 11:55. So I think we take like hour plus total to get to the collision cuz as I said we were going at a moderate speed. We we didn't have much speed. So from point A to point B, I'll say roughly an hour plus cuz we left Robo Grizzly >> for like after 10. After 10:00 >> closer to 11 or closer to >> Yeah, around like 10:45 there about 10:45 >> and the collision happened like 11:55. >> So that would be an hour >> like an hour plus approximately an hour plus >> including the stop. >> Yeah, including the stop and everything.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C44", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "time-interval correction", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Corrects fifty-minutes-to-hour estimate as starting at slowdown near Windjammer; separately estimates departure about 10:45 and impact around 11:55, about an hour-plus including stop.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0540", "P3-U0541", "P3-U0542", "P3-U0543", "P3-U0544", "P3-U0545", "P3-U0546", "P3-U0547", "P3-U0548", "P3-U0549", "P3-U0550", "P3-U0551", "P3-U0552", "P3-U0553", "P3-U0554", "P3-U0555", "P3-U0556", "P3-U0557", "P3-U0558", "P3-U0559", "P3-U0560" ], "start_char": 48872, "end_char_exclusive": 50340, "exact_source_excerpt": "You clearly indicated to commissioner defes that you took about 50. Just one second. 50 to an hour. >> 50 to 1 hour from when I tell the guy to stop. That's after not from the destination to the collision. >> So we for the records we want to indicate that >> from win jama to the collision. >> Yeah. You didn't ask that question. You only asked after I told the guy to um um um take it easy. That's where that's the question you asked. You never asked me from the destination to the collision how long I took. >> We we are getting there. We getting there. What was that? I thought >> So for the purpose of this sitting, we would label um Rodney Bay as point A. >> Mhm. >> We would register the point of the collision as point B. >> Mhm. >> For clear guidance. So from point A to point B, how long did your vessel take to travel that distance? >> Um your own estimate. >> We left we left around a little like after 10 collision happened around 11:55. So I think we take like hour plus total to get to the collision cuz as I said we were going at a moderate speed. We we didn't have much speed. So from point A to point B, I'll say roughly an hour plus cuz we left Robo Grizzly >> for like after 10. After 10:00 >> closer to 11 or closer to >> Yeah, around like 10:45 there about 10:45 >> and the collision happened like 11:55. >> So that would be an hour >> like an hour plus approximately an hour plus >> including the stop. >> Yeah, including the stop and everything.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-045", "P3-046" ], "caveat": "Approximate recollection; collision time later attributed to what others said. Not measured chronology.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C45", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal; examiner", "statement": "Pascal did not see a named offshore rock or its beacon; examiner describes a light flashing twice every five seconds near Windjammer.", "status": "navigation-aid observation", "source": "III P3-046, P3-047 / P3-U0553, P3-U0554, P3-U0555, P3-U0556, P3-U0557, P3-U0558, P3-U0559, P3-U0560, P3-U0561, P3-U0562, P3-U0563, P3-U0564, P3-U0565, P3-U0566, P3-U0567, P3-U0568, P3-U0569, P3-U0570, P3-U0571, P3-U0572, P3-U0573, P3-U0574, P3-U0575, P3-U0576, P3-U0577, P3-U0578, P3-U0579, P3-U0580, P3-U0581, P3-U0582, P3-U0583, P3-U0584", "source_anchor": "P3-046", "caveat": "Rock name Furo/Barl O garbled; beacon presence/characteristic not independently established. Passenger had restricted forward view.", "exact_excerpt": ">> for like after 10. After 10:00 >> closer to 11 or closer to >> Yeah, around like 10:45 there about 10:45 >> and the collision happened like 11:55. >> So that would be an hour >> like an hour plus approximately an hour plus >> including the stop. >> Yeah, including the stop and everything. So visibility was poor as you indicated. Yeah. >> But did you see it? >> Mhm. >> Did you see Furo rock? Barl O. You familiar with that area? >> Repeat yourself. >> There's a rock called Furo Rock or Barl Obif. It's the rock in the water between >> Well, where I was seated, you know, I'm a short individual. Where I was seated, I was seated right in front of the console. So I couldn't have seen much. you know, my focus I was just watching in front of my boat, you know, and sometimes I'd watch on the shoreline where I could have seen lights. >> Okay. So, you did not see that rock? >> I didn't. >> But would you you are familiar with that area? >> I'm aware of that. I know what you're talking the big rock outside of Brazil. >> Outside of Win Jama that area just >> Yes, we pass >> between we pass to the shoreline like close to the shoreline. But this light, you did not see the rock, but the rock is fitted with a flashing light. >> I didn't see the I didn't see that rocket. And Slasper ensure that that light I think you have two flashes every 5 seconds to indicate the presence of the rock. It's what you call a navigational aid, but you did not see it. >> Well, I didn't. >> So, my other question to you, you did not see the rock, but you had Mr. your lookout. >> Mhm. >> Sitting almost on the bow. >> Mhm. >> Did he receive any major injury? >> Did he receive any >> any major injury as a result of the accident? Actually, >> um from what I saw, yeah, he had received some blows to his his knee. He had a um how you call that? Uh how you calling that? A crutch. He had a crutch. But those guys don't take those things serious. He he I saw he was in I saw he had some some some >> some injuries. So from what commissioner defes was asking you we were trying and we are still trying to establish how could someone sit at that point if you look at the magnitude. Have you seen your vessel since the accident? Have you seen your boat since the accident? ", "epistemic_status": "non_observation_and_panel_proposition", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C45", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal; examiner", "evidence_category": "navigation-aid observation", "epistemic_status": "non_observation_and_panel_proposition", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Pascal did not see a named offshore rock or its beacon; examiner describes a light flashing twice every five seconds near Windjammer.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0553", "P3-U0554", "P3-U0555", "P3-U0556", "P3-U0557", "P3-U0558", "P3-U0559", "P3-U0560", "P3-U0561", "P3-U0562", "P3-U0563", "P3-U0564", "P3-U0565", "P3-U0566", "P3-U0567", "P3-U0568", "P3-U0569", "P3-U0570", "P3-U0571", "P3-U0572", "P3-U0573", "P3-U0574", "P3-U0575", "P3-U0576", "P3-U0577", "P3-U0578", "P3-U0579", "P3-U0580", "P3-U0581", "P3-U0582", "P3-U0583", "P3-U0584" ], "start_char": 50048, "end_char_exclusive": 52302, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> for like after 10. After 10:00 >> closer to 11 or closer to >> Yeah, around like 10:45 there about 10:45 >> and the collision happened like 11:55. >> So that would be an hour >> like an hour plus approximately an hour plus >> including the stop. >> Yeah, including the stop and everything. So visibility was poor as you indicated. Yeah. >> But did you see it? >> Mhm. >> Did you see Furo rock? Barl O. You familiar with that area? >> Repeat yourself. >> There's a rock called Furo Rock or Barl Obif. It's the rock in the water between >> Well, where I was seated, you know, I'm a short individual. Where I was seated, I was seated right in front of the console. So I couldn't have seen much. you know, my focus I was just watching in front of my boat, you know, and sometimes I'd watch on the shoreline where I could have seen lights. >> Okay. So, you did not see that rock? >> I didn't. >> But would you you are familiar with that area? >> I'm aware of that. I know what you're talking the big rock outside of Brazil. >> Outside of Win Jama that area just >> Yes, we pass >> between we pass to the shoreline like close to the shoreline. But this light, you did not see the rock, but the rock is fitted with a flashing light. >> I didn't see the I didn't see that rocket. And Slasper ensure that that light I think you have two flashes every 5 seconds to indicate the presence of the rock. It's what you call a navigational aid, but you did not see it. >> Well, I didn't. >> So, my other question to you, you did not see the rock, but you had Mr. your lookout. >> Mhm. >> Sitting almost on the bow. >> Mhm. >> Did he receive any major injury? >> Did he receive any >> any major injury as a result of the accident? Actually, >> um from what I saw, yeah, he had received some blows to his his knee. He had a um how you call that? Uh how you calling that? A crutch. He had a crutch. But those guys don't take those things serious. He he I saw he was in I saw he had some some some >> some injuries. So from what commissioner defes was asking you we were trying and we are still trying to establish how could someone sit at that point if you look at the magnitude. Have you seen your vessel since the accident? Have you seen your boat since the accident? ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-046", "P3-047" ], "caveat": "Rock name Furo/Barl O garbled; beacon presence/characteristic not independently established. Passenger had restricted forward view.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C46", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Saw lookout with knee injury/crutch; has seen wreck photos on a phone but not physically visited recovered boat.", "status": "injury and wreck-access testimony", "source": "III P3-047, P3-048 / P3-U0580, P3-U0581, P3-U0582, P3-U0583, P3-U0584, P3-U0585, P3-U0586, P3-U0587, P3-U0588, P3-U0589, P3-U0590, P3-U0591, P3-U0592, P3-U0593, P3-U0594", "source_anchor": "P3-047", "caveat": "Does not establish complete injury diagnosis or photographic chain of custody.", "exact_excerpt": "Did he receive any major injury? >> Did he receive any >> any major injury as a result of the accident? Actually, >> um from what I saw, yeah, he had received some blows to his his knee. He had a um how you call that? Uh how you calling that? A crutch. He had a crutch. But those guys don't take those things serious. He he I saw he was in I saw he had some some some >> some injuries. So from what commissioner defes was asking you we were trying and we are still trying to establish how could someone sit at that point if you look at the magnitude. Have you seen your vessel since the accident? Have you seen your boat since the accident? >> Repeat yourself. >> Have you seen your boat since the accident? >> Yes I've seen Well, I've seen pictures. The boat itself. Have you seen it? >> Yeah, I've seen pictures. >> The boat. Have you seen the boat itself? The boat. The physical boat. >> Like which boat? My boat or your boat? >> Your boat. >> My boat. I've seen it on photo on on phone. >> But you've not seen the boat itself? >> No, I haven't gone to see the boat ever since.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C46", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "injury and wreck-access testimony", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Saw lookout with knee injury/crutch; has seen wreck photos on a phone but not physically visited recovered boat.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0580", "P3-U0581", "P3-U0582", "P3-U0583", "P3-U0584", "P3-U0585", "P3-U0586", "P3-U0587", "P3-U0588", "P3-U0589", "P3-U0590", "P3-U0591", "P3-U0592", "P3-U0593", "P3-U0594" ], "start_char": 51661, "end_char_exclusive": 52741, "exact_source_excerpt": "Did he receive any major injury? >> Did he receive any >> any major injury as a result of the accident? Actually, >> um from what I saw, yeah, he had received some blows to his his knee. He had a um how you call that? Uh how you calling that? A crutch. He had a crutch. But those guys don't take those things serious. He he I saw he was in I saw he had some some some >> some injuries. So from what commissioner defes was asking you we were trying and we are still trying to establish how could someone sit at that point if you look at the magnitude. Have you seen your vessel since the accident? Have you seen your boat since the accident? >> Repeat yourself. >> Have you seen your boat since the accident? >> Yes I've seen Well, I've seen pictures. The boat itself. Have you seen it? >> Yeah, I've seen pictures. >> The boat. Have you seen the boat itself? The boat. The physical boat. >> Like which boat? My boat or your boat? >> Your boat. >> My boat. I've seen it on photo on on phone. >> But you've not seen the boat itself? >> No, I haven't gone to see the boat ever since.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-047", "P3-048" ], "caveat": "Does not establish complete injury diagnosis or photographic chain of custody.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C47", "part": "III", "speaker": "Commissioner; Pascal", "statement": "Examiner describes starboard-bow destruction and suggests severe/fatal injury should follow; Pascal says lookout was on left, damage on right, and was thrown out.", "status": "damage proposition and seat/ejection account", "source": "III P3-048 / P3-U0585, P3-U0586, P3-U0587, P3-U0588, P3-U0589, P3-U0590, P3-U0591, P3-U0592, P3-U0593, P3-U0594, P3-U0595", "source_anchor": "P3-048", "caveat": "Biomechanical death/injury inference is unproved. Pascal discussion may rely on photos; no full damage survey.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Repeat yourself. >> Have you seen your boat since the accident? >> Yes I've seen Well, I've seen pictures. The boat itself. Have you seen it? >> Yeah, I've seen pictures. >> The boat. Have you seen the boat itself? The boat. The physical boat. >> Like which boat? My boat or your boat? >> Your boat. >> My boat. I've seen it on photo on on phone. >> But you've not seen the boat itself? >> No, I haven't gone to see the boat ever since. But if you look at the magnitude of the destruction or the the damage to the boat, the entire portion of the bow towards the starboard side, which is the Raj side, is damaged, which means your lookout would have received severe damage or possibly died during the collision. >> Well, on what side it was? He was on the left hand side. The impact was more like on the on the right hand side. He was on that side of the boat. They say that's the boat. He was on that side. All impact was there. He was one of the guys who flew outside of the boat. He was flew outside of the boat from the impact. ", "epistemic_status": "panel_proposition_and_witness_response", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C47", "source_part": 3, "person": "Commissioner; Pascal", "evidence_category": "damage proposition and seat/ejection account", "epistemic_status": "panel_proposition_and_witness_response", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Examiner describes starboard-bow destruction and suggests severe/fatal injury should follow; Pascal says lookout was on left, damage on right, and was thrown out.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0585", "P3-U0586", "P3-U0587", "P3-U0588", "P3-U0589", "P3-U0590", "P3-U0591", "P3-U0592", "P3-U0593", "P3-U0594", "P3-U0595" ], "start_char": 52302, "end_char_exclusive": 53336, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Repeat yourself. >> Have you seen your boat since the accident? >> Yes I've seen Well, I've seen pictures. The boat itself. Have you seen it? >> Yeah, I've seen pictures. >> The boat. Have you seen the boat itself? The boat. The physical boat. >> Like which boat? My boat or your boat? >> Your boat. >> My boat. I've seen it on photo on on phone. >> But you've not seen the boat itself? >> No, I haven't gone to see the boat ever since. But if you look at the magnitude of the destruction or the the damage to the boat, the entire portion of the bow towards the starboard side, which is the Raj side, is damaged, which means your lookout would have received severe damage or possibly died during the collision. >> Well, on what side it was? He was on the left hand side. The impact was more like on the on the right hand side. He was on that side of the boat. They say that's the boat. He was on that side. All impact was there. He was one of the guys who flew outside of the boat. He was flew outside of the boat from the impact. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-048" ], "caveat": "Biomechanical death/injury inference is unproved. Pascal discussion may rely on photos; no full damage survey.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C48", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says he heard group discussions in which lookout said he saw nothing, though he did not personally question him.", "status": "lookout discussion clarification", "source": "III P3-049 / P3-U0596, P3-U0597, P3-U0598, P3-U0599, P3-U0600, P3-U0601, P3-U0602, P3-U0603, P3-U0604, P3-U0605, P3-U0606", "source_anchor": "P3-049", "caveat": "Nuances earlier no-conversation answer; not proof zero knowledge of lookout account.", "exact_excerpt": ">> But it it still does not give us the idea how he could have been seated in a specific area. >> Mhm. >> And would not have seen anything. And to compound the matter, you have not found it fit to ask him as the boat owner because that would have been your responsibility. >> Mhm. >> So would you say that you have failed in your responsibility? You would agree with me that you have >> I feel >> just wait. You would have agree with me that you have failed with your responsibility to ask the lookout what did he see? Did he see anything or what happened? Well, as I said, I haven't asked him, but from what the cap the captain has been questioning him and he's been saying that he didn't see anything. That's what he's been saying. But for me to go and ask him any question, I haven't asked him any question. But the captain did. >> So I am speaking in the context of you as the owner of the vessel. >> Mhm. >> Because remember here four individual lost their lives. Mhm. >> And to me, from the 18th of July to now, it would be rather strange that you have not as your lookout anything concerning what he may have seen or not. July, August, September, October. Well, as I said, I heard cuz we always among each other and you know, sometimes the topic come ups and you know, so I've known you know what was being said. But for me see I asked him I have not but I've already heard like what transpired like if if he saw anything if he didn't see anything and you know what he's been saying he didn't see anything coming. ", "epistemic_status": "hearsay", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C48", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "lookout discussion clarification", "epistemic_status": "hearsay", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says he heard group discussions in which lookout said he saw nothing, though he did not personally question him.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0596", "P3-U0597", "P3-U0598", "P3-U0599", "P3-U0600", "P3-U0601", "P3-U0602", "P3-U0603", "P3-U0604", "P3-U0605", "P3-U0606" ], "start_char": 53336, "end_char_exclusive": 54857, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> But it it still does not give us the idea how he could have been seated in a specific area. >> Mhm. >> And would not have seen anything. And to compound the matter, you have not found it fit to ask him as the boat owner because that would have been your responsibility. >> Mhm. >> So would you say that you have failed in your responsibility? You would agree with me that you have >> I feel >> just wait. You would have agree with me that you have failed with your responsibility to ask the lookout what did he see? Did he see anything or what happened? Well, as I said, I haven't asked him, but from what the cap the captain has been questioning him and he's been saying that he didn't see anything. That's what he's been saying. But for me to go and ask him any question, I haven't asked him any question. But the captain did. >> So I am speaking in the context of you as the owner of the vessel. >> Mhm. >> Because remember here four individual lost their lives. Mhm. >> And to me, from the 18th of July to now, it would be rather strange that you have not as your lookout anything concerning what he may have seen or not. July, August, September, October. Well, as I said, I heard cuz we always among each other and you know, sometimes the topic come ups and you know, so I've known you know what was being said. But for me see I asked him I have not but I've already heard like what transpired like if if he saw anything if he didn't see anything and you know what he's been saying he didn't see anything coming. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-049" ], "caveat": "Nuances earlier no-conversation answer; not proof zero knowledge of lookout account.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Butcher/Mavado gives his own evidence on Day 2 and denies being the lookout. Chris ultimately says his lookout description was inferred from the bow seat; Lester does not know of an appointment. Pascal’s Day 1 assignment claim remains part of the record, now disputed.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P2-142", "D2P2-280", "D2P3-S106" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C49", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal and commissioner", "statement": "Pascal says he gave no RPM or numerical speed; challenges assertion that his speed and elapsed time do not match, and qualifies approximate departure estimate.", "status": "speed/time disagreement", "source": "III P3-050, P3-051 / P3-U0607, P3-U0608, P3-U0609, P3-U0610, P3-U0611, P3-U0612, P3-U0613, P3-U0614, P3-U0615, P3-U0616, P3-U0617, P3-U0618, P3-U0619, P3-U0620, P3-U0621, P3-U0622, P3-U0623, P3-U0624, P3-U0625", "source_anchor": "P3-050", "caveat": "No route distance or actual speed established in exchange. Do not adopt examiner mathematical contradiction as demonstrated.", "exact_excerpt": ">> So we remain on navigational terms because the lookout failed. >> Mhm. >> The lights apparently did not assist. So I am going on basic navigational procedures with you. >> Mhm. If your vessel were traveling at how many RPMs did you say? >> I'm not sure. I'm not the captain to be honest. I didn't say how many RPM it was traveling. I've never said I've never said that. >> Okay. >> I've never never said boots traveling at whatever RPM. I haven't said that. I'm not the captain. >> So, you have no idea. Have you ever driven that vessel? >> Well, I've driven it. I've driven it, but I don't know how much RPM he was driving at that night. >> Because based on based on what based on what you're trying to describe here is that if you use the basic navigational calculations >> Mhm. >> the speed, the time, the distance is not matching. It's not >> like what speed and what that not matching. I haven't said anything about speed. I said the guy was driving at a moderate speed. Well, yes, we were driving at a moderate speed and that's the time we took. That's the time it happened. So maybe I might like the time phrase we left maybe might be wrong because I say approximately, you know, I wasn't cuz at the time that happened there sometimes you wouldn't check your time to see what time you left. It's just assuming like what time we left. So on my ends, you know, you cannot blame me because I at the moment when we left, I didn't check time. I just said, you know, we left around >> approximately 10:45. >> Yeah, around that time. So it could be. But would it would it always take you an hour, hour and 15 minutes from Gilelay to Sufre? >> Well, it depend on how you move. If it's a direct ride sometimes from suare to run there depend on the water some it will take you maybe an hour 30 minutes hour 25 it depend how you moving what engine not behind you you understand it depend it depend how fast you going what stops you making so it depend So, and I'm still I I'm still telling you that the the time the distance times multiply time speed is distance. >> Distance. If you're an owner of a boat, this it's simple calculation. >> Mhm. If you travel from point A to point B at such a speed, it will take you that amount of time. >> Yeah. Well, as I said, where we left from point A, it was about that time. Approximately that time when we get to the place when the incident happened, most people say it was around 11:55. But I'm saying what I could assume how long we take from point A to point B, I'd say within the range of 50 to an hour. Around that. ", "epistemic_status": "disputed_inference", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C49", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal and commissioner", "evidence_category": "speed/time disagreement", "epistemic_status": "disputed_inference", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Pascal says he gave no RPM or numerical speed; challenges assertion that his speed and elapsed time do not match, and qualifies approximate departure estimate.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0607", "P3-U0608", "P3-U0609", "P3-U0610", "P3-U0611", "P3-U0612", "P3-U0613", "P3-U0614", "P3-U0615", "P3-U0616", "P3-U0617", "P3-U0618", "P3-U0619", "P3-U0620", "P3-U0621", "P3-U0622", "P3-U0623", "P3-U0624", "P3-U0625" ], "start_char": 54857, "end_char_exclusive": 57419, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> So we remain on navigational terms because the lookout failed. >> Mhm. >> The lights apparently did not assist. So I am going on basic navigational procedures with you. >> Mhm. If your vessel were traveling at how many RPMs did you say? >> I'm not sure. I'm not the captain to be honest. I didn't say how many RPM it was traveling. I've never said I've never said that. >> Okay. >> I've never never said boots traveling at whatever RPM. I haven't said that. I'm not the captain. >> So, you have no idea. Have you ever driven that vessel? >> Well, I've driven it. I've driven it, but I don't know how much RPM he was driving at that night. >> Because based on based on what based on what you're trying to describe here is that if you use the basic navigational calculations >> Mhm. >> the speed, the time, the distance is not matching. It's not >> like what speed and what that not matching. I haven't said anything about speed. I said the guy was driving at a moderate speed. Well, yes, we were driving at a moderate speed and that's the time we took. That's the time it happened. So maybe I might like the time phrase we left maybe might be wrong because I say approximately, you know, I wasn't cuz at the time that happened there sometimes you wouldn't check your time to see what time you left. It's just assuming like what time we left. So on my ends, you know, you cannot blame me because I at the moment when we left, I didn't check time. I just said, you know, we left around >> approximately 10:45. >> Yeah, around that time. So it could be. But would it would it always take you an hour, hour and 15 minutes from Gilelay to Sufre? >> Well, it depend on how you move. If it's a direct ride sometimes from suare to run there depend on the water some it will take you maybe an hour 30 minutes hour 25 it depend how you moving what engine not behind you you understand it depend it depend how fast you going what stops you making so it depend So, and I'm still I I'm still telling you that the the time the distance times multiply time speed is distance. >> Distance. If you're an owner of a boat, this it's simple calculation. >> Mhm. If you travel from point A to point B at such a speed, it will take you that amount of time. >> Yeah. Well, as I said, where we left from point A, it was about that time. Approximately that time when we get to the place when the incident happened, most people say it was around 11:55. But I'm saying what I could assume how long we take from point A to point B, I'd say within the range of 50 to an hour. Around that. ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-050", "P3-051" ], "caveat": "No route distance or actual speed established in exchange. Do not adopt examiner mathematical contradiction as demonstrated.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C50", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says most people place incident around 11:55, while his own duration estimate remains roughly fifty minutes to an hour.", "status": "collision-time hearsay", "source": "III P3-051 / P3-U0625", "source_anchor": "P3-051", "caveat": "Distinguish others' time from his observation; later estimate differs from earlier hour-plus.", "exact_excerpt": "Well, as I said, where we left from point A, it was about that time. Approximately that time when we get to the place when the incident happened, most people say it was around 11:55. But I'm saying what I could assume how long we take from point A to point B, I'd say within the range of 50 to an hour. Around that.", "epistemic_status": "approximation_and_hearsay", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C50", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "collision-time hearsay", "epistemic_status": "approximation_and_hearsay", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says most people place incident around 11:55, while his own duration estimate remains roughly fifty minutes to an hour.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0625" ], "start_char": 57103, "end_char_exclusive": 57418, "exact_source_excerpt": "Well, as I said, where we left from point A, it was about that time. Approximately that time when we get to the place when the incident happened, most people say it was around 11:55. But I'm saying what I could assume how long we take from point A to point B, I'd say within the range of 50 to an hour. Around that.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-051" ], "caveat": "Distinguish others' time from his observation; later estimate differs from earlier hour-plus.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C51", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says Tyson went to assist when calls for help were heard.", "status": "post-impact response account", "source": "III P3-052 / P3-U0628, P3-U0629, P3-U0630, P3-U0631", "source_anchor": "P3-052", "caveat": "Supports broad sequence of Tyson leaving controls; does not corroborate number or identity of people rescued.", "exact_excerpt": "So what did you do immediately upon impact? >> Um >> as the owner of the vessel. >> Well um what happened? Tyson. Tyson end up going assist after we heard some help.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C51", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "post-impact response account", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says Tyson went to assist when calls for help were heard.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0628", "P3-U0629", "P3-U0630", "P3-U0631" ], "start_char": 57448, "end_char_exclusive": 57613, "exact_source_excerpt": "So what did you do immediately upon impact? >> Um >> as the owner of the vessel. >> Well um what happened? Tyson. Tyson end up going assist after we heard some help.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-052" ], "caveat": "Supports broad sequence of Tyson leaving controls; does not corroborate number or identity of people rescued.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C52", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Says he went to controls and Mavado/Jonel to engine because steering was disconnected though engine still running, attempting slowly to reach shore with passengers aboard.", "status": "post-impact steering/mechanical account", "source": "III P3-052 / P3-U0635", "source_anchor": "P3-052", "caveat": "Damage described AFTER impact; not evidence pre-collision mechanical failure. Need both participants, survey and controls examination.", "exact_excerpt": "I went behind the I went behind the stair. I went behind the stair and try and bring the boat closer to shore cuz there was still passengers on board. So my intention was to try and bring the boat closer. So I went behind the stair. um Jonel which is Movado went behind the um the engine because at the time the steering it wasn't turning like everything had already disconnected but the engine was still on so Jel Movado went on control but I wasn't putting too much speed because you know the power of the 150 so you know I went at a little speed to try and reach closer to shore you know but we did not reach too far the boat end Same.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C52", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "post-impact steering/mechanical account", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Says he went to controls and Mavado/Jonel to engine because steering was disconnected though engine still running, attempting slowly to reach shore with passengers aboard.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0635" ], "start_char": 57688, "end_char_exclusive": 58326, "exact_source_excerpt": "I went behind the I went behind the stair. I went behind the stair and try and bring the boat closer to shore cuz there was still passengers on board. So my intention was to try and bring the boat closer. So I went behind the stair. um Jonel which is Movado went behind the um the engine because at the time the steering it wasn't turning like everything had already disconnected but the engine was still on so Jel Movado went on control but I wasn't putting too much speed because you know the power of the 150 so you know I went at a little speed to try and reach closer to shore you know but we did not reach too far the boat end Same.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-052" ], "caveat": "Damage described AFTER impact; not evidence pre-collision mechanical failure. Need both participants, survey and controls examination.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C53", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "Expressly says boat sank; grabbed life jacket and swam to nearest catamaran/yacht.", "status": "firsthand sinking and escape account", "source": "III P3-052, P3-053 / P3-U0638, P3-U0639, P3-U0640, P3-U0641, P3-U0642", "source_anchor": "P3-052", "caveat": "Upgrades Cazorla sinking from early press attribution to owner eyewitness testimony. Still not final wreck survey or precise sinking coordinate.", "exact_excerpt": "so when the boat sunk, I grab a live vest and then I swim to the nearest boat which was a a catamaran or yacht. >> Okay. >> Or you may call it. >> Okay. Understood. >> Went to there. So that's it.", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C53", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "firsthand sinking and escape account", "epistemic_status": "testimony", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Expressly says boat sank; grabbed life jacket and swam to nearest catamaran/yacht.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0638", "P3-U0639", "P3-U0640", "P3-U0641", "P3-U0642" ], "start_char": 58385, "end_char_exclusive": 58581, "exact_source_excerpt": "so when the boat sunk, I grab a live vest and then I swim to the nearest boat which was a a catamaran or yacht. >> Okay. >> Or you may call it. >> Okay. Understood. >> Went to there. So that's it.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-052", "P3-053" ], "caveat": "Upgrades Cazorla sinking from early press attribution to owner eyewitness testimony. Still not final wreck survey or precise sinking coordinate.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 adds survivors’ accounts of Cazorla flooding/sinking, attempted movement and life-jacket retrieval. The engine state, powered movement and hatch condition need reconciliation with physical evidence.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P2-170", "D2P3-S061", "D2P3-S065" ] } }, { "id": "P3-C54", "part": "III", "speaker": "Pascal", "statement": "At other boat borrowed/accessed a phone and first called his aunt; says panic left this the number he remembered.", "status": "emergency-call account", "source": "III P3-053 / P3-U0644, P3-U0645, P3-U0646, P3-U0647, P3-U0648", "source_anchor": "P3-053", "caveat": "No call log, emergency dispatch time or onward action established; do not attribute delay/deaths to this alone.", "exact_excerpt": "Yeah, that's what I'm saying. So when I reached there, that's why I started making some calls. There was a guy with a phone. >> I called my auntie. First person I called was my auntie and tell her that happened. So yes, I did make calls. >> But as a boat owner, you would be you would be um you should be familiar with the first person you call is 999 911, the emergency services. So even if you call 999 or 911 and you explain to them what happened, they would pass you on to the marine unit, the ancillary suare police and so on. The emergency services is the first person you call because you have nine persons whose life is in danger, not your auntie. >> Yeah, but at the time at the time panic mode and and and that's the only number I could remember. I didn't remember no police >> 911 and 91. I'm just telling you you telling me that there at the moment but in the event the the moment that happening there sometimes panic you know you you traumatize you you think is is your closest person you'll think to call so I call my auntie that's who I thought of that's the number I remembered at the time I called my auntie Because what what is key", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_context", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C54", "source_part": 3, "person": "Pascal", "evidence_category": "emergency-call account", "epistemic_status": "admission_and_context", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "At other boat borrowed/accessed a phone and first called his aunt; says panic left this the number he remembered.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0644", "P3-U0645", "P3-U0646", "P3-U0647", "P3-U0648" ], "start_char": 58664, "end_char_exclusive": 59813, "exact_source_excerpt": "Yeah, that's what I'm saying. So when I reached there, that's why I started making some calls. There was a guy with a phone. >> I called my auntie. First person I called was my auntie and tell her that happened. So yes, I did make calls. >> But as a boat owner, you would be you would be um you should be familiar with the first person you call is 999 911, the emergency services. So even if you call 999 or 911 and you explain to them what happened, they would pass you on to the marine unit, the ancillary suare police and so on. The emergency services is the first person you call because you have nine persons whose life is in danger, not your auntie. >> Yeah, but at the time at the time panic mode and and and that's the only number I could remember. I didn't remember no police >> 911 and 91. I'm just telling you you telling me that there at the moment but in the event the the moment that happening there sometimes panic you know you you traumatize you you think is is your closest person you'll think to call so I call my auntie that's who I thought of that's the number I remembered at the time I called my auntie Because what what is key", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-053" ], "caveat": "No call log, emergency dispatch time or onward action established; do not attribute delay/deaths to this alone.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C55", "part": "III", "speaker": "Commissioner", "statement": "Examiner says emergency services through 999/911 should be first call.", "status": "emergency-number advice", "source": "III P3-053 / P3-U0646", "source_anchor": "P3-053", "caveat": "Verify actual local emergency routing before publishing numbers as safety instructions; questioning is not telecom evidence.", "exact_excerpt": "But as a boat owner, you would be you would be um you should be familiar with the first person you call is 999 911, the emergency services. So even if you call 999 or 911 and you explain to them what happened, they would pass you on to the marine unit, the ancillary suare police and so on. The emergency services is the first person you call because you have nine persons whose life is in danger, not your auntie.", "epistemic_status": "panel_advice", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high role; named examiner uncertain", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C55", "source_part": 3, "person": "Commissioner", "evidence_category": "emergency-number advice", "epistemic_status": "panel_advice", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high role; named examiner uncertain", "statement": "Examiner says emergency services through 999/911 should be first call.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0646" ], "start_char": 58905, "end_char_exclusive": 59319, "exact_source_excerpt": "But as a boat owner, you would be you would be um you should be familiar with the first person you call is 999 911, the emergency services. So even if you call 999 or 911 and you explain to them what happened, they would pass you on to the marine unit, the ancillary suare police and so on. The emergency services is the first person you call because you have nine persons whose life is in danger, not your auntie.", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-053" ], "caveat": "Verify actual local emergency routing before publishing numbers as safety instructions; questioning is not telecom evidence.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C56", "part": "III", "speaker": "Chair/commissioner; Pascal", "statement": "Questioners call answers casual and chair refers to a vibe; Pascal rejects indifference, saying he is being honest about practice.", "status": "demeanour assessment and response", "source": "III P3-054, P3-055, P3-056 / P3-U0649, P3-U0650, P3-U0651, P3-U0652, P3-U0653, P3-U0654, P3-U0655, P3-U0656, P3-U0657, P3-U0658, P3-U0659, P3-U0660", "source_anchor": "P3-054", "caveat": "Demeanour is not proof of dishonesty, intent or responsibility. Hearing loss, interruptions and question framing matter.", "exact_excerpt": ">> very casual the the mood and all of that it seems to be I am not sure if I am mistaken in my interpretation of your composure but it seems to be a very casual one that like casual about the situation. >> Yes. >> Uh no, I wouldn't say such. >> I think um there may be other questions but um Mr. Chair probably at another One more. Yeah, thank you for your evidence. Um, I do know do hope that you've taken note of a number of things which which came from us. I'm hoping that you did take note of a number of things that were put to you or questions asked of you because there are it you may have given the impression I'm sure unintentionally but you may have given the impression that you you were a little casual about this and there yeah I'm not casual about it >> and there is nothing casual in this situation I'm saying I I doubt if you intended to convey that but I'm telling you what came across to us there is that you were a little casual. You know, we do that with story. >> That's what you took it as. But no, >> I I'm speaking I'm speaking and I'm telling you how you came across to the commission as being a little casual about the procedures that yes, you're supposed to do that, but we do that with with guests, but we don't do that uh with with with locals. Um yes. Well, that's the what you that's what you say, that's what the papers say. This is much more serious than that. As I indicated, not just we have we have the lives of four people who were lost as a result of the collision and we have a number of incidents that have taken place, maritime incidents and accidents. All of this opportunity is being taken to explore all of that and to see what it is that has been done wrong and right and how we can correct it. And you are a boat operator and you should more than any of us here be taking this situation very very seriously. >> The impact it can have on your livelihood and on the lives of others. And as I said, this is what you were giving off to us. Doesn't mean that as you sat there, that is what you intended. But in terms of the way in which you were answering questions, I'm just telling you, you were giving off, you know, let's use colloquial terms. You were giving off a vibe. That wasn't good. That wasn't cool. >> Yeah. >> No, but that's the honest truth. I You wanted me to lie about the whole situation. I just we clearly not understanding each other. >> Yeah, I understand what you're saying. I'm casual like I answering the things like you know I don't it's not like I don't care and I'm casual about it. I'm just being realistic about you know how everything happened and what happened. It's not like I I casual about that's what you take it but that's not what it is with me. >> Yeah. And I'm just telling you that that you were coming off in that way. That as much as I want to think that you did not intend to come off that way, that you were coming off that way. I say this for your your benefit, for your guidance, you're in a a business that that things are happening that can cause modes of operation, operational practices, procedures, regulations, legislation to be altered based on what happened. and what should have happened and what didn't happen and you you should take very seriously this incident not just for it and of itself but for the whole future of the business that you you involved in. So I want to I want to take the opportunity to tell you those things. you are a boat owner, a boat operator and what as I said what has happened not just what has happened in this incident is extremely serious but there are other things that have happened or not happened uh which this commission will address and is addressing so just be mindful of that as I said and and be very much aware that we're into some serious serious what is it pun intended okay is there anything you wanted to say to to the commission before you end your your evidence? ", "epistemic_status": "procedural_assessment_and_dispute", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for chair in concluding exchange; earlier examiner uncertain", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C56", "source_part": 3, "person": "Chair/commissioner; Pascal", "evidence_category": "demeanour assessment and response", "epistemic_status": "procedural_assessment_and_dispute", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high for chair in concluding exchange; earlier examiner uncertain", "statement": "Questioners call answers casual and chair refers to a vibe; Pascal rejects indifference, saying he is being honest about practice.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0649", "P3-U0650", "P3-U0651", "P3-U0652", "P3-U0653", "P3-U0654", "P3-U0655", "P3-U0656", "P3-U0657", "P3-U0658", "P3-U0659", "P3-U0660" ], "start_char": 60150, "end_char_exclusive": 64058, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> very casual the the mood and all of that it seems to be I am not sure if I am mistaken in my interpretation of your composure but it seems to be a very casual one that like casual about the situation. >> Yes. >> Uh no, I wouldn't say such. >> I think um there may be other questions but um Mr. Chair probably at another One more. Yeah, thank you for your evidence. Um, I do know do hope that you've taken note of a number of things which which came from us. I'm hoping that you did take note of a number of things that were put to you or questions asked of you because there are it you may have given the impression I'm sure unintentionally but you may have given the impression that you you were a little casual about this and there yeah I'm not casual about it >> and there is nothing casual in this situation I'm saying I I doubt if you intended to convey that but I'm telling you what came across to us there is that you were a little casual. You know, we do that with story. >> That's what you took it as. But no, >> I I'm speaking I'm speaking and I'm telling you how you came across to the commission as being a little casual about the procedures that yes, you're supposed to do that, but we do that with with guests, but we don't do that uh with with with locals. Um yes. Well, that's the what you that's what you say, that's what the papers say. This is much more serious than that. As I indicated, not just we have we have the lives of four people who were lost as a result of the collision and we have a number of incidents that have taken place, maritime incidents and accidents. All of this opportunity is being taken to explore all of that and to see what it is that has been done wrong and right and how we can correct it. And you are a boat operator and you should more than any of us here be taking this situation very very seriously. >> The impact it can have on your livelihood and on the lives of others. And as I said, this is what you were giving off to us. Doesn't mean that as you sat there, that is what you intended. But in terms of the way in which you were answering questions, I'm just telling you, you were giving off, you know, let's use colloquial terms. You were giving off a vibe. That wasn't good. That wasn't cool. >> Yeah. >> No, but that's the honest truth. I You wanted me to lie about the whole situation. I just we clearly not understanding each other. >> Yeah, I understand what you're saying. I'm casual like I answering the things like you know I don't it's not like I don't care and I'm casual about it. I'm just being realistic about you know how everything happened and what happened. It's not like I I casual about that's what you take it but that's not what it is with me. >> Yeah. And I'm just telling you that that you were coming off in that way. That as much as I want to think that you did not intend to come off that way, that you were coming off that way. I say this for your your benefit, for your guidance, you're in a a business that that things are happening that can cause modes of operation, operational practices, procedures, regulations, legislation to be altered based on what happened. and what should have happened and what didn't happen and you you should take very seriously this incident not just for it and of itself but for the whole future of the business that you you involved in. So I want to I want to take the opportunity to tell you those things. you are a boat owner, a boat operator and what as I said what has happened not just what has happened in this incident is extremely serious but there are other things that have happened or not happened uh which this commission will address and is addressing so just be mindful of that as I said and and be very much aware that we're into some serious serious what is it pun intended okay is there anything you wanted to say to to the commission before you end your your evidence? ", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-054", "P3-055", "P3-056" ], "caveat": "Demeanour is not proof of dishonesty, intent or responsibility. Hearing loss, interruptions and question framing matter.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13" }, { "id": "P3-C57", "part": "III", "speaker": "Chair; Pascal", "statement": "Pascal offers nothing further, is released subject to recall, and hearing adjourns until tomorrow at 10 a.m.", "status": "procedural endpoint", "source": "III P3-057 / P3-U0661, P3-U0662, P3-U0663, P3-U0664, P3-U0665, P3-U0666, P3-U0667", "source_anchor": "P3-057", "caveat": "On stated 13 October hearing date this announces 14 October; does not prove next sitting actually occurred.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Uh, not really. >> Very well. >> Not really. >> Very well. You it is possible that you may be recalled at some stage. If that is being done, you will be appropriately informed and appropriately summoned in the event that anything arises that causes the commission to require further evidence from you. >> Very well. >> Yeah. So the business of this commission is adjourned until tomorrow morning at 10:00. >> Thank you, Mr. Pascal.\n", "epistemic_status": "procedural_record", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "original": { "claim_id": "P3-C57", "source_part": 3, "person": "Chair; Pascal", "evidence_category": "procedural endpoint", "epistemic_status": "procedural_record", "speaker_attribution_confidence": "high", "statement": "Pascal offers nothing further, is released subject to recall, and hearing adjourns until tomorrow at 10 a.m.", "source_file": "Commission_of_Inquiry_PT_III_Oct_13_2026.md", "source_units": [ "P3-U0661", "P3-U0662", "P3-U0663", "P3-U0664", "P3-U0665", "P3-U0666", "P3-U0667" ], "start_char": 64058, "end_char_exclusive": 64493, "exact_source_excerpt": ">> Uh, not really. >> Very well. >> Not really. >> Very well. You it is possible that you may be recalled at some stage. If that is being done, you will be appropriately informed and appropriately summoned in the event that anything arises that causes the commission to require further evidence from you. >> Very well. >> Yeah. So the business of this commission is adjourned until tomorrow morning at 10:00. >> Thank you, Mr. Pascal.\n", "audio_timestamp": null, "reading_block_ids": [ "P3-057" ], "caveat": "On stated 13 October hearing date this announces 14 October; does not prove next sitting actually occurred.", "publication_guidance": "Attribute testimony and document descriptions; not a final Commission finding. Check proper-name spellings and material numbers against recording/exhibits." }, "day": 1, "date": "2026-10-13", "followup": { "text": "Day 2 is now included in this register. Its final part records a provisional further sitting on 21 October, subject to confirmation; this is not the final inquiry report.", "segmentIds": [ "D2P3-S119", "D2P3-S120" ] } }, { "id": "D2P1-C01", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Romeon Williams", "statement": "The second witness identifies himself as Romeon Williams; the surname ending S is explicitly confirmed.", "status": "identity clarification", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0105 (01:29:09), D2P1-P0106 (01:30:40)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0106", "caveat": "Given-name orthography still needs witness list/audio confirmation; no separate Romanian person.", "exact_excerpt": "That's William. with an S or without? >> With a with an S. >> With an S. >> Could you state your Can you speak into the mic, please? >> Could you state your name, your address, and your occupation? >> My name is Romeon Williams. I'm from Soufriere and I'm a kitchen steward at Sugar Beach. >> Where you from? Was that Jack? Soufriere. And what job do you have at Trigger Beach? >> Kitchen Stewart.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-001", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:30:40", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0106", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0105", "D2P1-P0106" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C02", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Rivier describes illuminated red and green lights at the bow; Williams recalls two colors already illuminated as the boat came to collect them at Pigeon Island.", "status": "corroborating testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0040 (00:39:06), D2P1-P0041 (00:40:17), D2P1-P0159 (02:03:33), D2P1-P0160 (02:04:14)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0041", "caveat": "Does not establish full lighting compliance, continuous operation or Ocean Angel lights.", "exact_excerpt": "Can you tell us what color lights? >> Red and green. >> What can you tell us about these lights? They were at the tip of the boat all the way to the front. >> Just to be clear, we are talking about we're talking about Kaza here. >> Yes. And these lights you speak of, were they on? >> Yes, they were. Upon embarking the vessel to commence your journey back to Soufriere, Did you hear anything from the captain of that vessel", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-002", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:40:17", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0041", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0040", "D2P1-P0041", "D2P1-P0159", "D2P1-P0160" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C03", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Rivier was looking at stars; Williams had his head down in prayer; neither saw Ocean Angel approaching.", "status": "limits of observation", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0059 (00:58:42), D2P1-P0065 (01:03:17), D2P1-P0100 (01:26:23), D2P1-P0120 (01:38:57), D2P1-P0121 (01:39:24), D2P1-P0161 (02:05:00)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0120", "caveat": "Failure to see lights must not become observed absence of lights.", "exact_excerpt": ">> No. >> You didn't hear what sounded like a a collision of of two boats? >> It sounded like sounded normal. Like a wave. >> Like a wave? >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> At impact. On impact. I mean, >> on impact. It just sounded like a wave. >> Like a wave. Yeah. >> Did you see anything prior to the impact? Any light? Any oncoming object? anything at all? >> No. My head was down. I was saying a", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-003", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:38:57", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0120", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0059", "D2P1-P0065", "D2P1-P0100", "D2P1-P0120", "D2P1-P0121", "D2P1-P0161" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C04", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Both passengers report no safety briefing; Williams says no life jacket was offered on boarding.", "status": "safety-practice testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0049 (00:51:46), D2P1-P0051 (00:53:18), D2P1-P0111 (01:33:54), D2P1-P0141 (01:50:23)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0141", "caveat": "Distinguish equipment carried from offered, located, fitted and worn.", "exact_excerpt": "of the ocean. When you bought it, were you offered a life jacket? >> No. >> Did you request one? >> No. >> If I may ask, why why didn't you? Yeah, the guys are not new to this. So, >> excuse me. >> The guys are not new to this. So, I trusted them. >> You trusted them. And when you say them, you're speaking specifically to reference to >> those owner, the captain.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-004", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:50:23", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0141", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0049", "D2P1-P0051", "D2P1-P0111", "D2P1-P0141" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C05", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Romeon Williams", "statement": "Williams heard Pascal tell Tyson to take it easy; he says speed reduced immediately and stayed reduced until collision.", "status": "corroborating testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0116 (01:36:38), D2P1-P0143 (01:51:32), D2P1-P0155 (02:00:31)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0155", "caveat": "No measured impact speed; initial quick return speed must not be assigned to final approach.", "exact_excerpt": "than moderate speed? Is it because Mr. Pascal said to slow down? >> Yes. Anything else that prompted you to think that it was more than moderate? >> No. Since he said that. >> And when Mr. Pascal said to slow down, did um the captain reduce the speed immediately? >> Yes, he did. >> So, did the vessel continue to travel at the reduced speed up until the collision? >> Yes. And you also said that the vessel stopped so that you could have been", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-005", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:00:31", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0155", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0116", "D2P1-P0143", "D2P1-P0155" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C06", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Both support Taylor requesting the jacket for Romeon; Williams says Pascal fetched it and Taylor helped fit it after boat movement stopped.", "status": "corroboration with timing differences", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0015 (00:11:13), D2P1-P0018 (00:14:31), D2P1-P0118 (01:37:53), D2P1-P0119 (01:38:29), D2P1-P0156 (02:01:08), D2P1-P0164 (02:07:30)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0156", "caveat": "Cannot establish engine off; locked storage explicitly rejected; no precise waypoint.", "exact_excerpt": "given a life jacket. Did the engine stopped completely or did the vessel simply stop moving forward? >> I wouldn't be able to tell you that, but the vessel stopped. And how long was the vessel How long did the vessel stop? Roughly 2 minutes. A minute. >> Roughly 2 minutes. >> Yeah, >> cuz I had to put on the life jacket before the party. >> And who assisted you in putting on the life jacket? >> Taylor.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-006", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:01:08", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0156", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0015", "D2P1-P0018", "D2P1-P0118", "D2P1-P0119", "D2P1-P0156", "D2P1-P0164" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C07", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Both witnesses say Tyson swam to them and helped them reach an Ocean Angel fragment.", "status": "corroborating rescue testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0020 (00:17:05), D2P1-P0021 (00:18:20), D2P1-P0022 (00:19:30), D2P1-P0122 (01:39:55), D2P1-P0123 (01:40:28), D2P1-P0124 (01:40:59)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0123", "caveat": "Positive post-impact conduct does not settle collision responsibility.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Yes. Tyson came to us. >> I beg your pause. >> Tyson swam to us. >> Tyson swam >> to us >> from the from your boat. >> No. Yeah. He was I I believe he was still on board the boat. Yeah. >> Yeah. So he swam and met you and Taylor. That's right. >> Just the two of you. >> That's right. >> And what when he met the two of you, where did where were you all taken? >> To uh to a piece of a boat. At the time,", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-007", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:40:28", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0123", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0020", "D2P1-P0021", "D2P1-P0022", "D2P1-P0122", "D2P1-P0123", "D2P1-P0124" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C08", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Romeon called Taylor's father from the fragment and signaled an approaching rescuer with his phone light; Taylor also describes Dylan signaling.", "status": "communication and rescue testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0025 (00:22:51), D2P1-P0027 (00:24:44), D2P1-P0028 (00:26:06), D2P1-P0124 (01:40:59), D2P1-P0125 (01:41:35), D2P1-P0126 (01:42:13)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0028", "caveat": "Do not infer father occupation from suspect ASR or absence of onward emergency calls.", "exact_excerpt": "Yes. What next happened? >> Uh, so we were waiting for a while. Maybe a few minutes after that, we saw a boat coming from the direction of Castries. So Dylan and Romeon had their flashlights on. They waved for the boat to come to us for assistance. See Dylan and Romeon had their flash files. >> Yes. Is it their flashlights or their phone lights? You said >> phone lights. Flashlights on their phone.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-008", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:26:06", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0028", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0025", "D2P1-P0027", "D2P1-P0028", "D2P1-P0124", "D2P1-P0125", "D2P1-P0126" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C09", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Both witnesses describe a very slow approach by the rescuer; nickname provisionally Kafu/Cafu, formal name and boat unresolved.", "status": "rescue testimony with limits", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0092 (01:20:03), D2P1-P0093 (01:20:24), D2P1-P0095 (01:21:51), D2P1-P0127 (01:42:48), D2P1-P0130 (01:44:23)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0093", "caveat": "A prompted theoretical possibility of contact is not affirmative evidence a rescuer hit someone.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Okay. Okay. So, I want to take you through a delicate process and I I just want you to be kind of mindful during the assist. What speed did the rescue vessel move through the wreckage coming to assist you all? on the five of you on the the partially damaged boat, the white the floating object. >> Um, he took his time. He came in very slow. >> From what distance? >> I cannot estimate that. >> Closer to the shore. I can tell you for", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-009", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:20:24", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0093", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0092", "D2P1-P0093", "D2P1-P0095", "D2P1-P0127", "D2P1-P0130" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C10", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Final clarified accounts from both passengers place Dylan and Tyson on the Ocean Angel fragment as the first rescue load left.", "status": "clarified rescue sequence", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0031 (00:29:55), D2P1-P0033 (00:31:36), D2P1-P0129 (01:43:52), D2P1-P0130 (01:44:23)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0033", "caveat": "Preserve initial ambiguity in transcript; use explicit later corrections in narrative. Day 2 Parts II–III describe other survivors using a yacht and Ti Kaye; those are separate rescue routes.", "exact_excerpt": "Dylan was on the boat when it left Can >> No, they stayed on the broken piece of Ocean Angel. That's why he had to go back to get them. >> Sorry, I didn't get that. I didn't get that. You said >> Dylan and Tyson stayed on the broken piece of Ocean Angel. That's why the rescue captain had to go back to get them. >> Dylan. And who was the other name? Tyson >> and Tyson. So you and Shakabe and Makita,", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-010", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:31:36", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0033", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0031", "D2P1-P0033", "D2P1-P0129", "D2P1-P0130" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C11", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier", "statement": "Taylor says Z/Miss Nestor, unsure of given name, was retrieved unresponsive and taken ashore with her; Elias Day1 recalls Debbie on his rescue boat.", "status": "identity unresolved", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0029 (00:27:15), D2P1-P0030 (00:28:30), D2P1-P0034 (00:32:43), D2P1-P0091 (01:19:28)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0030", "caveat": "Do not assume same rescue load or Shakabe=Elias. Unresponsive is not a death pronouncement.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Uh, Makita or I'm not too sure. You found Makita Nesta alive. >> Unresponsive. >> Yes. What next happened? >> Uh from there he took us to Caneries to be offloaded. He had to go back to assist the others that stayed on the boat. So the captain of that other boat >> Mhm. >> dropped you and Roxan >> Mhm. >> Romeon was still with you. >> Yes.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-011", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:28:30", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0030", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0029", "D2P1-P0030", "D2P1-P0034", "D2P1-P0091" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C12", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Taylor and Romeon say they went by pickup from Canaries to Soufriere, later to St Jude; Romeon expressly says he had no injuries.", "status": "outcome and transport testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0036 (00:34:23), D2P1-P0037 (00:35:27), D2P1-P0132 (01:45:30), D2P1-P0133 (01:45:56), D2P1-P0135 (01:47:01), D2P1-P0140 (01:49:46)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0140", "caveat": "Fourteen injured plus four deceased does not validate a manifest or every survivor's injury.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Good afternoon, Mr. Williams. >> Good afternoon. Um before I start, did you suffer any injuries? >> No. >> In there? None at all? >> No. >> You mentioned that you don't like the ocean? >> No. >> However, and you're not a swimmer, I'm correct. >> No. So when you boarded the vessel at 4:30 or so at Soufriere Jetty, you're not a swimmer and you have a fear", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-012", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:49:46", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0140", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0036", "D2P1-P0037", "D2P1-P0132", "D2P1-P0133", "D2P1-P0135", "D2P1-P0140" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C13", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Both passengers place outbound departure near 4:30 rather than Tyson's about 3; Taylor estimates about 35 minutes return travel to impact, shorter than Pascal's estimates.", "status": "chronology unresolved", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0008 (00:04:33), D2P1-P0074 (01:09:30), D2P1-P0108 (01:31:59), D2P1-P0109 (01:32:40)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0008", "caveat": "Separate embarkation, departure, stop, collision and report time; no authenticated clock readings.", "exact_excerpt": "started. Did the trip start in Soufriere or in or in Gary? >> Uh we started at Soufriere. We left around almost close to 4:30. >> Okay, just a minute. The trip started at Soufriere close to 4:30. On what vessel did you travel to Su from Soufriere? I did not know the name of the boat at the time, but Mago's boat. >> I'm sorry. >> Mr. Pascal's boat. >> You do not know the name of it up to now? >> Cazorla Junior.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-013", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:04:33", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0008", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0008", "D2P1-P0074", "D2P1-P0108", "D2P1-P0109" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C14", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Passengers place Mavado at the front but cannot establish his assigned duty; Taylor says she was not paying attention to his vigilance.", "status": "role not established", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0075 (01:10:05), D2P1-P0076 (01:10:35), D2P1-P0077 (01:11:10), D2P1-P0078 (01:11:43), D2P1-P0165 (02:07:59), D2P1-P0166 (02:08:33)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0077", "caveat": "Examiner statements about employment/role are not new witness evidence; Lester and Mavado not merged.", "exact_excerpt": ">> no. >> Anything between you and I I would have seen coming? >> No. >> Just to be I I need to get that answer clear. You saying that he was seated casually and not looking out or are you saying that you don't know or you don't remember? I just need to hear that very clearly. >> Um, well, it could be both cuz he was casually sitting, but being on a boat, you would look around at your surroundings. So, I'm not sure it was designated for being a lookout.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-014", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:11:10", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0077", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0075", "D2P1-P0076", "D2P1-P0077", "D2P1-P0078", "D2P1-P0165", "D2P1-P0166" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C15", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Commission secretary; Taylor Rivier; Romeon Williams", "statement": "Commission lacks both witnesses' police statements; Williams says his was typed, read back and not signed.", "status": "statement-handling gap", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0005 (00:01:42), D2P1-P0006 (00:02:59), D2P1-P0107 (01:31:20), D2P1-P0108 (01:31:59)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0107", "caveat": "Not proof no signed/later statement exists or police deliberately withheld evidence.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Kitchen Stewart. Yeah, >> Mr. Chair, sorry. May I also note that u Mr. Williams did indicate that he had made a a statement to the police, but we do not have um sight of that document either. >> Thank you, Madam Secretary. So, confirming that you did make a statement to the police in relation to what happened on 18th July? >> Yes, I did. >> Did you sign that statement? >> No. >> Was the statement ever read over to you? >> Was that", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-015", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:31:20", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0107", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0005", "D2P1-P0006", "D2P1-P0107", "D2P1-P0108" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P1-C16", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "I", "speaker": "Questioner; SLPA arithmetic check", "statement": "A questioner uses a 14–15 nautical mile route estimate and a 45-minute journey to suggest at least 30 knots. SLPA’s conditional arithmetic gives about 18.7–20 knots for those inputs; the witness had earlier estimated 45–60 minutes.", "status": "editorial arithmetic check", "source": "Day 2, Part I · D2P1-P0114 (01:35:33), D2P1-P0146 (01:53:49), D2P1-P0147 (01:54:42)", "source_anchor": "D2P1-P0147", "caveat": "The distance and times are not verified measurements. This is an editorial arithmetic check of a proposition, not an established voyage speed. Average speed cannot establish collision speed after a slowdown and stop.", "exact_excerpt": "which is considerable speed. So it is my fair judgment to believe and we can do the calculation. It's very easy to do that based on what you may have experienced because you said you left at 4:30 approximate. >> Yeah. >> 4:30 in the afternoon. You all took about 45 minutes roughly to get there. That vessel would have to to push up at least 30 knots. So just imagine a vessel with so that vessel would have to travel at approximately 20 between 20 to 30 knots.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "D2-016", "source_part": 1, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:54:42", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P1-P0147", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P1-P0114", "D2P1-P0146", "D2P1-P0147" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C01", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward says he joined the southbound return journey after staying in Rodney Bay, attending Remedy and accompanying a friend he calls Wabi/Wabby. He did not travel north on Cazorla Jr. He describes himself as a passenger on this trip.", "status": "direct testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-005 (00:05:11), D2P2-010 (00:09:40), D2P2-011 (00:10:22), D2P2-012 (00:11:04), D2P2-020 (00:16:09), D2P2-033 (00:26:20)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-020", "caveat": "This establishes his own claimed presence; it does not settle all nine occupants or Wabby’s formal identity. His residence is garbled as Lennisil Suare and should not be silently expanded.", "exact_excerpt": "person were you the driving the boat or somebody else >> no I was there as like a passenger >> a passenger >> but being a crew member from another vessel being a captaincertified a crew certified person, you would have seen something. >> Well, the the place I sitted, I couldn't see anything cuz it was dark. >> Okay. When you left Rodney Bay, there is a rock or a reef outside Winjama slightly. You familiar with that", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E01", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:16:09", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-020", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-005", "D2P2-010", "D2P2-011", "D2P2-012", "D2P2-020", "D2P2-033" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C02", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "Edward first says he sat on starboard, then reverses port/starboard light colours. After a commissioner explains red-port/green-starboard, he agrees he sat on the red/port side. Later he again says right-hand side.", "status": "internal inconsistency", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-013 (00:11:45), D2P2-014 (00:12:12), D2P2-015 (00:12:43), D2P2-016 (00:13:30), D2P2-017 (00:14:09), D2P2-044 (00:34:23), D2P2-076 (00:55:45)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-016", "caveat": "This is not proof the actual boat’s lights were installed backwards. Use an unresolved side marker in seating diagrams. His colour terminology is unreliable even though he consistently reports that red and green lights were on.", "exact_excerpt": "knowledge, the port side is red and the starboard side is green. In other words, the red side is on your left, which is the port side of the vessel. And the right side, which is green, is the opposite. >> As I see, it's a red and a green light. >> Okay. >> Yeah. So you were sitting on the side of the green or the red? >> The red. >> So which means you were sitting on the port side of the vessel. Is that correct?", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E02", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:13:30", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-016", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-013", "D2P2-014", "D2P2-015", "D2P2-016", "D2P2-017", "D2P2-044", "D2P2-076" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C03", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "He initially identifies Windjammer as the stop for a life jacket, then corrects himself to a place transcribed as an slurry / on slurry, contextually likely Anse La Raye, and says they did not stop at Windjammer.", "status": "internal correction", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-018 (00:14:46), D2P2-019 (00:15:34), D2P2-039 (00:30:26), D2P2-040 (00:31:14)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-019", "caveat": "Treat Anse La Raye as a context-supported proposed correction, with raw text retained and audio review recommended. Do not place an exact stop coordinate from this answer.", "exact_excerpt": "the coast because you are certified. >> Sorry about it. It was an slurry slurry asked for the live vest >> on slurry. >> Yeah. >> So why did you stop at wing jama? Any particular reason? >> No we didn't stop at wjama. our answer and slowly we stop >> because it win jama have kept have been in that conversation twice so I'm just wondering did something happen at wing jamba >> no >> what speed do you estimate that your the", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E03", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:15:34", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-019", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-018", "D2P2-019", "D2P2-039", "D2P2-040" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C04", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "He says he saw neither the other vessel nor its lights before impact and heard no warning. He describes being thrown into the sea.", "status": "non-observation", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-025 (00:19:53), D2P2-045 (00:35:06), D2P2-077 (00:56:34)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-045", "caveat": "His inability to see the other vessel does not establish that Ocean Angel was unlit or its heading, speed, hull angle or first contact point.", "exact_excerpt": "vest the guy asked for and after five minutes to 6 minutes after I we got a huge impact and after that I fly over. >> A huge impact. Was there a loud noise? >> Well, I didn't know any noise. I just like heard like a impact like a little sound of impact because I fly over the boats into the sea. Okay. And what happened while you were in the sea? Immediately I saw Taylor and a boyfriend. They asking for help. I told Tyson assist them. After that we took the boat. I swim to the boat. We bought the boat. I saw one of my friends", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E06", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:35:06", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-045", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-025", "D2P2-045", "D2P2-077" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C05", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "Edward says he saw Taylor and her partner asking for help, directed Tyson toward them, and saw Tyson swim to help. His police statement, read aloud, says Tyson saved them.", "status": "direct testimony with quoted prior statement", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-025 (00:19:53), D2P2-026 (00:20:40), D2P2-045 (00:35:06), D2P2-079 (00:58:01), D2P2-080 (00:59:00), D2P2-086 (01:03:10)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-086", "caveat": "Keep partner wording or established name from other testimony; Edward himself alternates boyfriend/husband and does not know the man’s name. This does not settle every rescue action by every occupant.", "exact_excerpt": "boat, I swim back to the boat to help the one of my friends and the people that was on the boat cuz I saw the captain jump in the sea to help one of the people that couldn't swim. >> Yes, that is established. You clearly said that he saved Tyson, jump over the boat and saved Taylor and her husband. So that is the responsibility of a captain in the event of an incident. He tried to save as many persons as possible. So it is established that Tyson did just that. >> Yeah. Yeah, but it is also in your statement that the owner of the vessel", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E07", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:03:10", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-086", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-025", "D2P2-026", "D2P2-045", "D2P2-079", "D2P2-080", "D2P2-086" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C06", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "Edward’s oral evidence identifies only Taylor’s partner as wearing a life jacket. A commissioner reads his police statement as saying Taylor’s husband and about two others wore them. He attributes the earlier discrepancy to not remembering everything and maintains the one-wearer account.", "status": "documentary confrontation", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-048 (00:37:33), D2P2-049 (00:38:11), D2P2-050 (00:38:56), D2P2-051 (00:39:35)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-050", "caveat": "Present both versions. The quoted police statement is available here only through the hearing transcript; the underlying signed exhibit was not independently inspected.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Taylor boyfriend alone? So when you said to the police in your statement that two other persons, Taylor's husband and about two other persons were the only ones wearing life jackets. >> Why? Why did you say so? >> Maybe I couldn't remember. It was I was fresh. I couldn't remember anything. I couldn't remember everything. >> So you couldn't remember everything. Yeah, cuz I know he's the only person that as for a live vest. >> So now you're saying that the only person who was wearing a live vest was", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E09", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:38:56", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-050", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-048", "D2P2-049", "D2P2-050", "D2P2-051" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C07", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "Edward says his own experience suggests close proximity to navigation lights can impair seeing ahead. He says Mavado told him he saw nothing approaching; Edward then supplies glare as his own explanation and confirms Mavado did not tell him that.", "status": "hypothesis", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-057 (00:43:16), D2P2-059 (00:44:41), D2P2-060 (00:45:10), D2P2-062 (00:46:09), D2P2-064 (00:47:30), D2P2-065 (00:48:18), D2P2-066 (00:48:45)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-065", "caveat": "Do not report navigation-light glare as the established reason the collision occurred or as Mavado’s explanation. The dialogue explores hypotheticals, including an unlit approaching boat.", "exact_excerpt": "accident? >> Yeah, we talk about that cuz we stay the same place. >> Okay. Um >> live the same place. >> And what what what has he told you about the oncoming vessel? >> Well, he told me he didn't say anything coming. >> He said he didn't see anything coming. by muffing was the reflection of the light prevent him from seeing. >> Did he tell you that? >> He didn't tell me nothing after that. >> No, I'm saying why would you think it", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E10", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:48:18", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-065", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-057", "D2P2-059", "D2P2-060", "D2P2-062", "D2P2-064", "D2P2-065", "D2P2-066" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C08", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "Edward repeatedly describes himself as certified captain, then says he has a course certificate but lacks an operating card/licence. The end of questioning resolves toward completion of captain/coxswain coursework, no captain’s operating licence, and intention to pursue crew qualification. The chair orders all relevant certificates/licences delivered to Soufrière police by noon Friday 16 October.", "status": "documentary clarification still pending", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-029 (00:23:07), D2P2-031 (00:24:39), D2P2-068 (00:49:57), D2P2-069 (00:50:55), D2P2-104 (01:15:55), D2P2-106 (01:17:04), D2P2-108 (01:18:19), D2P2-127 (01:29:40), D2P2-129 (01:30:46), D2P2-130 (01:31:12), D2P2-131 (01:31:39), D2P2-134 (01:33:06), D2P2-135 (01:33:47)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-134", "caveat": "His answers contain reversals even during the clarification. Publication should say the distinction was exposed and documents ordered, not claim independent verification of his legal licence status or the requirements for every class of vessel.", "exact_excerpt": "now? Friday the >> Yes, chairman. >> Friday 16th October. >> Yeah. Friday 16th October at 12:00 noon or by 12 noon you will deliver you will take the certificate and any other license or certificate that you have concerning the operation of boats you should make them available you take the copy to the super police station Joseph the secretary of the commission will arrange for an officer to be available to receive it from All right.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E11", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:33:06", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-134", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-029", "D2P2-031", "D2P2-068", "D2P2-069", "D2P2-104", "D2P2-106", "D2P2-108", "D2P2-127", "D2P2-129", "D2P2-130", "D2P2-131", "D2P2-134", "D2P2-135" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C09", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Jean Pierre Ralph Edward", "statement": "A commissioner challenges whether moving the damaged boat toward shore put property before people. Edward responds that people were still aboard, first gives inconsistent yes/no responses to claims the owner and bow passenger failed, and the chair intervenes before the exchange moves on.", "status": "questioning hypothesis and contested answer", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-080 (00:59:00), D2P2-081 (00:59:44), D2P2-082 (01:00:20), D2P2-083 (01:01:15), D2P2-084 (01:01:56), D2P2-087 (01:03:46), D2P2-088 (01:04:29), D2P2-089 (01:05:06), D2P2-090 (01:05:39)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-083", "caveat": "Do not turn the question’s claimed motive into fact. Movement, engine operation, onboard survivors and intention require reconstruction; avoid a headline saying they abandoned victims to save the boat.", "exact_excerpt": "I will say yes. >> You believe that it was the right thing for the owner of a boat to save the boat rather than to save persons in the water? >> Well, in the water, I would say in the water, it's much better saving them cuz in the boat, they in the boat already. Yes. >> If you were the captain of the vessel that evening, would you pay attention to the persons who were crying for help in the water or would you try to save your boat? >> I would um save the person in the water.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "E14", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:01:15", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-083", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-080", "D2P2-081", "D2P2-082", "D2P2-083", "D2P2-084", "D2P2-087", "D2P2-088", "D2P2-089", "D2P2-090" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C10", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Butcher (known as Mavado; given name unverified)", "statement": "The witness introduced as Janelle/General Butcher, also acknowledging Mavado, says he joined the return trip as a passenger, sat at the bow and was not the lookout. Edward and Chris identify him as lookout; Chris eventually explains that inference rests on seat position.", "status": "direct testimony and cross-witness disagreement", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-136 (01:34:22), D2P2-137 (01:35:44), D2P2-141 (01:38:19), D2P2-142 (01:39:04), D2P2-167 (01:54:32), D2P2-178 (02:02:46), D2P2-191 (02:12:23), D2P2-280 (03:12:53), D2P2-281 (03:13:45)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-142", "caveat": "Use Butcher (known as Mavado), with formal first-name spelling pending verification. Do not merge him with Lester/Soya. Sitting at the bow is not proof that lookout duties were assigned, accepted or performed.", "exact_excerpt": ">> No. >> So you were the person way up front? >> Yeah. >> Were there anybody sitting just behind you? >> The other one. >> Who? >> Two of them sitting behind me. >> Do you know this person's by name or nickname? No. >> You think you do not know them at all? >> I don't know them because I I was Brazil and they give me a ride to go to Sufra. So I never go up on their boat. >> Do you know a gentleman by the name of", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "B01", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:39:04", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-142", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-136", "D2P2-137", "D2P2-141", "D2P2-142", "D2P2-167", "D2P2-178", "D2P2-191", "D2P2-280", "D2P2-281" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C11", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Butcher (known as Mavado; given name unverified)", "statement": "He says he knows Tyson and saw him aboard but cannot recall him driving. His police statement is read as saying he noticed Tyson driving.", "status": "documentary discrepancy", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-143 (01:39:35), D2P2-144 (01:40:07), D2P2-145 (01:40:37), D2P2-150 (01:44:17), D2P2-151 (01:45:02)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-151", "caveat": "The dialogue does not resolve the difference. Do not diagnose intoxication, evasion or deliberate falsehood from this alone.", "exact_excerpt": "what you said before? Because before you said you notice he was the one driving the boat and now you're saying you don't know what he was doing. So which of those two statements are correct? Well, at the time I asked them to ride. >> Can you bring the mic a little closer? Just shift it up a bit up. Right. >> At the time I asked Mango to ride. I didn't see who I was being staring. >> So Mango is the owner of the boat. >> Yeah. >> That's how you all call him. >> Yeah. >> Right.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "B02", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:45:02", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-151", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-143", "D2P2-144", "D2P2-145", "D2P2-150", "D2P2-151" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C12", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Butcher (known as Mavado; given name unverified)", "statement": "Butcher repeatedly says a girl received and wore the jacket. Later he explains that after handing it over he resumed facing forward, did not watch who wore it, and had assumed it was for the girl.", "status": "corrected inference", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-152 (01:45:37), D2P2-153 (01:46:07), D2P2-173 (01:58:49), D2P2-174 (01:59:46), D2P2-175 (02:00:45), D2P2-190 (02:11:40), D2P2-191 (02:12:23), D2P2-192 (02:13:04)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-191", "caveat": "This later explanation must accompany any earlier contradiction. Avoid portraying the first assertion as equally weighted direct observation after the witness disclaims seeing the wearer.", "exact_excerpt": ">> When I give the life jacket, I sit back. So, I'm not watching what they doing. You won't you only see me back. So, I didn't I never turn to see you giving the life jacket. So, so I thought it was the girl because I know girls cannot swim. >> So, you thought it was the girl? You're not sure? >> Okay. Is that a yes or a no? >> Yes. >> So, yes. You you assume that the life jacket was for the girl? >> Yes. But you did you actually at any one", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "B03", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:12:23", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-191", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-152", "D2P2-153", "D2P2-173", "D2P2-174", "D2P2-175", "D2P2-190", "D2P2-191", "D2P2-192" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C13", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Butcher (known as Mavado; given name unverified)", "statement": "He recalls red and green lights, cannot confirm a white light, reports seeing no approaching boat, wake or lights, and says he was suddenly in the water.", "status": "direct perception and non-observation", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-149 (01:43:53), D2P2-158 (01:49:08), D2P2-159 (01:49:44), D2P2-160 (01:50:18), D2P2-161 (01:50:47), D2P2-162 (01:51:19), D2P2-163 (01:51:50), D2P2-195 (02:15:17), D2P2-196 (02:16:08), D2P2-209 (02:26:34), D2P2-210 (02:27:15)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-209", "caveat": "A commissioner’s suggestion that absent visible water reflection means lights were off is not a finding; Butcher explains his seat prevented seeing that patch of water. His statement that the other boat had no lights lacks direct observation of that boat.", "exact_excerpt": "Mango Tours, which is Gazola Jr. >> Yeah. >> You would have seen the boat, but you probably choose not to say anything. Is that correct? >> So, what are you saying there? You trying to tell me? >> I asked No, I asked you a question. >> You trying to tell me I see the Hello. >> Yeah. >> I ask you a question. Did you see the boat just ahead of you and choose not to say anything or you did not see the boat at all? If you were at the point where you said you were", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "B05", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:26:34", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-209", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-149", "D2P2-158", "D2P2-159", "D2P2-160", "D2P2-161", "D2P2-162", "D2P2-163", "D2P2-195", "D2P2-196", "D2P2-209", "D2P2-210" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C14", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Butcher (known as Mavado; given name unverified)", "statement": "Butcher’s police statement is read as describing reaching the steering, attempting to drive closer to shore, and the boat sinking when about two minutes from shore. Orally he says he did go to the steering but could not drive because the engine was off. Edward’s quoted statement attributes movement toward shore to Mango.", "status": "documentary discrepancy", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-080 (00:59:00), D2P2-168 (01:55:12), D2P2-169 (01:56:09), D2P2-170 (01:56:45), D2P2-171 (01:57:21)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-170", "caveat": "Attempting to drive is not proof of powered movement. Two minutes from shore is not a measured distance. Preserve all accounts, and seek engine, damage, drift and rescue-position evidence.", "exact_excerpt": "after the accident? >> I couldn't drive it. It It wasn't driving. >> But you tried to. You went to the steering, didn't you? I went to the steering. Yeah. But I never drive the boat. >> Yeah. But you said and attempted to drive it closer to shore. When we arrive about 2 minutes from shore, the boat sunk. So at that point, who was driving the boat? >> I wasn't driving the boat because the engine wasn't", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "B06", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:56:45", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-170", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-080", "D2P2-168", "D2P2-169", "D2P2-170", "D2P2-171" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C15", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Butcher (known as Mavado; given name unverified)", "statement": "He initially says there was a pre-departure briefing, but says he arrived as the captain was talking to people and cannot explain its content.", "status": "limited observation", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-180 (02:04:06), D2P2-181 (02:04:55), D2P2-182 (02:05:35)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-181", "caveat": "This is not full corroboration that an adequate safety briefing occurred; nor should his account be erased because others say none occurred.", "exact_excerpt": "briefing >> before we leave? >> Yes. And what did that briefing entail? >> Well, at the time he was giving this briefing, I just reached so I cannot explain the briefing for you, but I hear you was talking to the guys about something like when you're going down, you know. >> Can you just fix the mic so you speak into it? Thank you. So after that briefing, do you remember what time you departed Rodney Bay?", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "B07", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:04:55", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-181", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-180", "D2P2-181", "D2P2-182" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C16", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chris (surname unverified)", "statement": "Chris, surname transcribed Jabatis/Jabbatis, describes himself as a painter from Soufrière, a friend of Dwight Pascal, riding without charge. He places himself left, Dwight in the middle, and Lester Jean on the right of the seat ahead of the console; Butcher sat at the bow facing forward and Tyson was at the controls.", "status": "direct testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-213 (02:30:08), D2P2-238 (02:45:52), D2P2-239 (02:46:31), D2P2-240 (02:46:56), D2P2-248 (02:51:00), D2P2-249 (02:51:53)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-249", "caveat": "Formal surname and the small locality in his introduction need checking. Do not merge his name with Pascal or interpret ASR Ireina Jabatis as a distinct owner. This is one witness’s seating account, not a measured deck plan.", "exact_excerpt": ">> So when you all usually hire boats, do you all pay or is it that you just >> No, they pay. >> But on this particular >> No, but Mango Mango Dwight Pascal is my friend. >> Okay. Um, you also said that you had traveled on the boat many times before. >> Yeah. >> And during your past travels, has Tyson ever captained the boat? >> No. >> And do you know the name of the person who usually captains the boat?", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "C01", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:51:53", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-249", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-213", "D2P2-238", "D2P2-239", "D2P2-240", "D2P2-248", "D2P2-249" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C17", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chris (surname unverified)", "statement": "At the start he asks to remove the police-statement clause saying he could not tell if there were enough life jackets. Later he admits he did not count them or know the number, but believes there were enough because the owner is responsible, and agrees that is an assumption. He still maintains sufficiency.", "status": "documentary correction with weak knowledge basis", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-215 (02:31:33), D2P2-216 (02:32:06), D2P2-217 (02:32:41), D2P2-219 (02:34:23), D2P2-220 (02:35:07), D2P2-221 (02:35:38), D2P2-269 (03:05:43), D2P2-270 (03:06:24), D2P2-271 (03:06:48), D2P2-272 (03:07:17), D2P2-273 (03:07:43), D2P2-274 (03:08:12), D2P2-275 (03:08:38), D2P2-276 (03:09:13)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-274", "caveat": "Do not silently overwrite the prior uncertainty as a proven inventory. The request, the commission’s recorded amendment, and the later qualification belong together.", "exact_excerpt": "everybody. >> Yes. >> But you are not sure that there was sufficient for everybody. >> Outside of counting how many vests there were, you cannot say that there was sufficient for everybody. I know there was sufficient for everybody. >> But did you count? >> No, I did not count. >> Right. So apart so you just basing it again on the premise that the captain is responsible and you've come to the conclusion that there were sufficient", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "C02", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "03:08:12", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-274", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-215", "D2P2-216", "D2P2-217", "D2P2-219", "D2P2-220", "D2P2-221", "D2P2-269", "D2P2-270", "D2P2-271", "D2P2-272", "D2P2-273", "D2P2-274", "D2P2-275", "D2P2-276" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C18", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chris (surname unverified)", "statement": "He says Dwight asked Tyson once to take it easy, Tyson reduced speed immediately, and nobody else complained. He describes fast but not full speed and says he personally felt safe.", "status": "direct testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-223 (02:37:00), D2P2-224 (02:37:46), D2P2-225 (02:38:16), D2P2-228 (02:40:02), D2P2-233 (02:43:07), D2P2-235 (02:44:18), D2P2-251 (02:53:16), D2P2-252 (02:54:04), D2P2-265 (03:03:04), D2P2-266 (03:03:40)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-266", "caveat": "Personal comfort and below-maximum throttle are not proof of a safe speed for the conditions. His timeline varies and geographic knowledge is limited.", "exact_excerpt": "And and you stick by that. >> Yes. And could you describe the vessel for want of a better word? The behavior. How was the vessel operating in that weather? Was it >> The vessel was stable. >> Very stable. >> Yes. So, I'm going to move to the the point of impact. You see here, I felt a big impact accompanied by a loud crashing noise. Prior to the impact, was the sound", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "C03", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "03:03:40", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-266", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-223", "D2P2-224", "D2P2-225", "D2P2-228", "D2P2-233", "D2P2-235", "D2P2-251", "D2P2-252", "D2P2-265", "D2P2-266" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C19", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chris (surname unverified)", "statement": "He says he saw red, green and bright white lights aboard their boat, on at departure and throughout the journey. He saw no other vessel lights.", "status": "direct testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-242 (02:47:56), D2P2-252 (02:54:04), D2P2-253 (02:54:38)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-253", "caveat": "This adds a witness account of Cazorla lights; it does not establish visibility sectors, range, maintenance compliance or Ocean Angel’s light status.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Yes. >> And did it remain on during the throughout the entire journey? >> Yeah, it never went off. And did you observe any other lights in the water before the collision apart from the lights on your boat? >> No. >> You stated that the vessel was moving fast but not at full speed. How did you come to the conclusion that the vessel was not traveling at full speed? >> Like I tell you, I've been on it. You have been on it when it was traveling on at full speed.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "C04", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:54:38", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-253", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-242", "D2P2-252", "D2P2-253" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C20", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chris (surname unverified)", "statement": "He says he remained aboard with the others on his seat and the captain, heard a crash followed by a rough engine sound, and Tyson then stopped the engine. He heard cries for help to the right, not ahead, but cannot locate them precisely.", "status": "direct auditory account", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-243 (02:48:23), D2P2-244 (02:48:55), D2P2-245 (02:49:38), D2P2-246 (02:49:59), D2P2-247 (02:50:30), D2P2-248 (02:51:00)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-244", "caveat": "He saw nothing strike the engine and cannot attribute the second sound to a propeller/person/hull contact. Engine damage, propeller causation and impact angle remain unproven.", "exact_excerpt": "Vessel probably hit something. >> Yeah. And then you heard the engine made a sound. >> Yeah. Made a sound. >> Is it of hitting something or after the impact? >> That's after the impact. >> So the engine there was another sound in the engine after the impact. Did you see anything or anybody in the area of the engine after that second sound? >> No. What did the captain do at that point?", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "C05", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:48:55", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-244", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-243", "D2P2-244", "D2P2-245", "D2P2-246", "D2P2-247", "D2P2-248" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C21", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chris (surname unverified)", "statement": "He recalls no warning, no last-second slowing or course change, no approaching craft, and no observed distraction. He says no music was playing and he did not observe VHF use.", "status": "non-observation", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-236 (02:44:46), D2P2-237 (02:45:21), D2P2-238 (02:45:52), D2P2-250 (02:52:25), D2P2-254 (02:55:20), D2P2-255 (02:56:18), D2P2-267 (03:04:28), D2P2-268 (03:05:06)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-237", "caveat": "Absence of his observation is not proof that no call was made, no other boat existed nearby, or that any captain was legally at fault. His account adds no reliable approach vector.", "exact_excerpt": "or to the back of you? >> No. So you were the only vessel heading down to Sufre at that time? >> Yes sir. >> Do you know if there were any other vessel from Sufre attending the fet that may have left just after you or just before you? >> No, >> there were no others. Okay. >> You don't not know. >> You got pardon? >> You do not know or there were none >> that left before us be? >> You're right. The question is, do you", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "C06", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "02:45:21", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-237", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-236", "D2P2-237", "D2P2-238", "D2P2-250", "D2P2-254", "D2P2-255", "D2P2-267", "D2P2-268" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C22", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chris (surname unverified)", "statement": "Chris first names Butcher as lookout, briefly agrees when challenged that this could be incorrect, later insists there was a lookout, and finally confirms to the chair that he inferred the role because Butcher sat at the bow.", "status": "explicit inference", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-254 (02:55:20), D2P2-256 (02:57:16), D2P2-257 (02:58:00), D2P2-258 (02:58:34), D2P2-278 (03:11:12), D2P2-279 (03:12:03), D2P2-280 (03:12:53), D2P2-281 (03:13:45)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-280", "caveat": "The correct synthesis is a disputed/unverified assignment, not a finding that there definitely was or definitely was not an effective lookout.", "exact_excerpt": "questions from the commissioners, is there anything in your oral statement that you now wish to change? >> No. Just what what caused you to say that that Janelle Butcher was the lookout? What what's causing you to say that when when he's saying otherwise? I'm just trying to understand. Is it because he was seated on the bow that that that caused you to think, well, he must have been the lookout because that's where the lookout would normally sit. >> Yes. >> That is the basis upon which you say he", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "C07", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "03:12:53", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-280", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-254", "D2P2-256", "D2P2-257", "D2P2-258", "D2P2-278", "D2P2-279", "D2P2-280", "D2P2-281" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P2-C23", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "II", "speaker": "Chris (surname unverified)", "statement": "He says boat travel to shows can return around 2 a.m., estimates around five such trips without safety briefings, and says jacket use was sparse. He earlier describes some safety communication on previous Cazorla journeys, so trip scope needs care.", "status": "participant account of practice", "source": "Day 2, Part II · D2P2-250 (02:52:25), D2P2-251 (02:53:16), D2P2-260 (03:00:00), D2P2-261 (03:00:41), D2P2-262 (03:01:14), D2P2-283 (03:15:13), D2P2-284 (03:16:01)", "source_anchor": "D2P2-284", "caveat": "Do not turn one participant’s experience into measured island-wide prevalence or an unconditional claim every operator omits briefings. He distinguishes his personal practice from seeing occasional others wear jackets.", "exact_excerpt": ">> On any boat? And have you ever heard the captain or anyone giving safety briefings before the start of the the voyage? No. Did you sustain any injuries in the accident? Did you sustain any injuries as a result of the collision? >> Yes, sir. Lower down my knee. >> I beg your pardon? >> Lower down my knee. My shin. >> Okay. >> A bad injury. >> Just a split.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "C08", "source_part": 2, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "03:16:01", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P2-284", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P2-250", "D2P2-251", "D2P2-260", "D2P2-261", "D2P2-262", "D2P2-283", "D2P2-284" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C01", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "Lester is introduced as the final Day 2 witness and a Cazorla Jr. passenger. He says he gave police a statement on 19 July concerning the 18 July collision. His surname is variously rendered Ja, Jean, John and J in the automated text.", "status": "witness identity and self-report", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S001 (00:02:56), D2P3-S002 (00:06:45), D2P3-S003 (00:07:54), D2P3-S042 (00:37:09), D2P3-S043 (00:37:42)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S002", "caveat": "Formal surname spelling remains unverified. Lester/Soya is not Butcher/Mavado; the record must not merge them.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Yeah. >> I do swear. Do solemnly swear to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. So help me God. >> Sit close to the mic. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Can also even Yes, sir. >> Okay. Could you for the record state your name, address, and occupation? >> My name Lester Ja. I live in Soulet Street. occupation, I do maintenance, everything.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F01", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:06:45", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S002", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S001", "D2P3-S002", "D2P3-S003", "D2P3-S042", "D2P3-S043" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C02", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "The account supports an outbound group of seven including Lester: Tyson, Nyal/Niall, Taylor, Taylor's boyfriend, Taylor's sister and Mango. He says the sister stayed behind and three men joined for the return, named in this ASR as General Butcher, Japier and Wabi. That yields nine return occupants by arithmetic.", "status": "witness list plus clearly identified editorial arithmetic", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S006 (00:10:24), D2P3-S007 (00:11:03), D2P3-S011 (00:15:01), D2P3-S012 (00:16:08)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S012", "caveat": "This is a testimony-derived roster, not a signed manifest. The three added men need a source-backed alias crosswalk. Do not count a sister as a return passenger or merge/double-count an alias.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Mad Japier. >> Yes. And Wabi. >> Wabi. W A B I. >> Yes. I don't know how you spell it, but I know it's Wabi. Okay. Yeah. And when you left Pigeon Point, was any briefing given? Any safety briefing given? >> I tell you in the start, locals, we don't do briefings for locals. >> Very well. How often do you go on boat trips like the one you went on? How often do you go on these", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F02", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:16:08", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S012", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S006", "D2P3-S007", "D2P3-S011", "D2P3-S012" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C03", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "Lester says no safety briefing was given on either leg, and nobody was wearing or carrying a lifejacket at departure. He then describes Taylor asking for one for her boyfriend: Mavado supplied it from the bow to Mango, who passed it to Taylor, who fitted it on the boyfriend.", "status": "direct passenger testimony", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S008 (00:11:53), D2P3-S012 (00:16:08), D2P3-S014 (00:18:06), D2P3-S015 (00:19:36), D2P3-S016 (00:20:14), D2P3-S017 (00:21:06)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S017", "caveat": "The departure condition and later fitting are different times. Do not turn this into a claim that nobody wore a jacket throughout the return. ASR varies Mavado and Taylor names; cross-reference Day 2 Part I.", "exact_excerpt": "Taylor put it on. >> Put it on the boyfriend. >> Okay. >> Yes. >> And what is the next thing that happened? y'all going along the way. >> After that, >> Kayla asks for a life jacket for her boyfriend. Uh, Mango asks Mada to take it. Mado does that, hands it to to Mango. Mango hands it to Taylor. Taylor fits it on her boyfriend. What is the next thing that happened?", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F03", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:21:06", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S017", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S008", "D2P3-S012", "D2P3-S014", "D2P3-S015", "D2P3-S016", "D2P3-S017" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C04", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "He repeatedly says he saw no approaching boat or lights and first became aware of the incident through a loud impact. He could see shore lights, hotel lights and a parked yacht light, distinguishing those from the approaching craft.", "status": "direct report of perception", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S018 (00:21:40), D2P3-S019 (00:22:29), D2P3-S020 (00:23:42), D2P3-S088 (01:03:49), D2P3-S089 (01:04:30), D2P3-S090 (01:05:02)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S089", "caveat": "Failure to see a light is not proof that the other boat had no navigation lights. He was not an eyewitness to the incoming vessel's track or its approach angle. He later explains a pre-existing visual limitation.", "exact_excerpt": ">> last and anything that you remember that you observed before impact? No, I just know we are going down to sufly, you know. But to tell you like I noticed anything. We just I just heard a noise and that's it. >> So there was nothing out of the ordinary? >> No. No, nothing. >> You did not notice any lights coming towards you? >> No lights. Nothing. So no, >> no, nothing. >> No.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F04", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:04:30", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S089", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S018", "D2P3-S019", "D2P3-S020", "D2P3-S088", "D2P3-S089", "D2P3-S090" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C05", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "He identifies himself, Dwight/Mango, Nyal/Niall and Mavado as still aboard Cazorla Jr. He says four people were already in the water and Tyson jumped in to help. The examiner summarizes five in the water including Tyson; Lester corrects any implication that Tyson was thrown.", "status": "passenger account, with important clarification", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S023 (00:26:22), D2P3-S024 (00:27:10), D2P3-S025 (00:27:37), D2P3-S068 (00:51:13)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S025", "caveat": "He did not see individual people being ejected. The four-thrown-plus-captain-jumped reconstruction is based on absence from the boat and subsequent knowledge.", "exact_excerpt": ">> What were you doing at that moment? >> I was there on the boat trying to figure out how we could help the people. Went in the bow trying to look for life jacket in the bow. Open the bow. When I open the bow, then the boat stopped sinking. So the life jacket, I take life jacket and just throw it on the boat. Throw it anywhere. And I grab one and I jump in the sea to swim to go look for help. >> Where did you throw the life jackets? Into the boat or outside the boat? >> Into the water. Because the boat was already so I show it. It was in the", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F05", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:27:37", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S025", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S023", "D2P3-S024", "D2P3-S025", "D2P3-S068" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C06", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "Lester describes a damaged, unstable engine/control arrangement; Mango attempted to get toward shore and Mavado tried to hold the engine steady. The boat could not maintain a straight course. He nonetheless accepts some movement before sinking.", "status": "direct post-impact recollection", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S022 (00:25:54), D2P3-S023 (00:26:22), D2P3-S064 (00:49:08), D2P3-S065 (00:49:37), D2P3-S066 (00:50:07), D2P3-S068 (00:51:13), D2P3-S069 (00:51:51), D2P3-S070 (00:52:28), D2P3-S071 (00:53:14), D2P3-S072 (00:53:49), D2P3-S073 (00:54:19)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S065", "caveat": "The damaged component is not reliably identified. The examiner supplies ram, while the witness alternates steering, control and attachment descriptions. Do not diagnose a steering ram or transom failure as established.", "exact_excerpt": ">> So the boat was spinning around. >> No, it was it could never hold it the boat straight. Even though you give it spin cuz the thing break. So the engine is >> the thing in terms of >> to keep the engine >> the control. >> Yeah. Not the not the steering wheel. >> Okay. >> It's by the engine itself to keep it stable. So I think that damage. So the engine >> the ram I I jo >> the thing the the the part of the boat", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F06", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:49:37", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S065", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S022", "D2P3-S023", "D2P3-S064", "D2P3-S065", "D2P3-S066", "D2P3-S068", "D2P3-S069", "D2P3-S070", "D2P3-S071", "D2P3-S072", "D2P3-S073" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C07", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "He says he opened a square hatch at the bow, took out lifejackets, threw them into the flooding boat/water, grabbed a jacket and entered the water to seek help. He says the boat did not sink immediately at impact and associates the final sinking with an attempt to add engine power.", "status": "direct action recollection and temporal association", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S025 (00:27:37), D2P3-S026 (00:28:15), D2P3-S027 (00:28:37), D2P3-S059 (00:46:01), D2P3-S060 (00:46:34), D2P3-S063 (00:48:26), D2P3-S064 (00:49:08), D2P3-S066 (00:50:07), D2P3-S070 (00:52:28), D2P3-S073 (00:54:19)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S026", "caveat": "Do not claim opening the hatch caused the sinking, or that adding power was the technically established cause. He gives a sequence during a rapidly developing emergency.", "exact_excerpt": "water. It could be in the boat, but the boat had water to sinking. So in the water. So you had thrown these life jackets out of the boat. >> Yeah. >> In order for >> So who get it? Who get it? Yeah. >> And you say you jumped into the water yourself. >> You jumped into the water. >> When I say about sinking, I jump before life jacket too. >> Yeah. >> Okay. >> Yeah.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F07", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:28:15", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S026", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S025", "D2P3-S026", "D2P3-S027", "D2P3-S059", "D2P3-S060", "D2P3-S063", "D2P3-S064", "D2P3-S066", "D2P3-S070", "D2P3-S073" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C08", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "An examiner says the recovered vessel's severe damage meant there was no hatch left to open and calls Lester's statement incorrect. Lester maintains a bow cover was present when he retrieved jackets and raises possible subsequent damage or salvage effects.", "status": "disputed witness account versus examiner premise", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S057 (00:44:52), D2P3-S058 (00:45:26), D2P3-S059 (00:46:01), D2P3-S060 (00:46:34), D2P3-S061 (00:47:20), D2P3-S062 (00:47:55)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S061", "caveat": "The examiner's assertion is not a commission finding. Recovered condition is not automatically identical to the condition seconds after impact. A damaged mid/starboard area and a bow storage cover may not be the same location.", "exact_excerpt": "accident the the cover for the life jacket in the bow was there still >> do you know what part of the boat got damaged >> no sir I could not tell you it's only in the bow or standing in the bow the other hole water was coming in the bow But the bow was good. The whole boat was good. >> So I'm still saying to you the impact from the accident severely damage the port the mid which would be kind of made towards the stab side which is mid leading to the right", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F08", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:47:20", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S061", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S057", "D2P3-S058", "D2P3-S059", "D2P3-S060", "D2P3-S061", "D2P3-S062" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C09", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "When asked how far from impact the vessel sank, Lester first offers approximately 300 feet, then clarifies that as shore-to-impact distance; he estimates 30–40 feet from impact to sinking. Later questioning produces a much less clear 10 feet/5 feet exchange.", "status": "rough witness estimates with clarification", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S067 (00:50:34), D2P3-S068 (00:51:13), D2P3-S071 (00:53:14)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S068", "caveat": "Do not map a precise collision coordinate or drift distance from this exchange. The 300 feet is not the final impact-to-sinking estimate.", "exact_excerpt": ">> from the impact. >> From the impact. >> So there was movement. >> Yeah. Yes. >> Right. And how many persons were on the boat while it was sinking? >> I think four. Four of us. >> Four of you. >> Nyall Mango and Mado. Did the captain drive that boat at all after the impact? Not the captain, the owner. No, I just think he tried to just speed because it wasn't moving anywhere. That's the that gifa.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F09", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:51:13", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S068", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S067", "D2P3-S068", "D2P3-S071" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C10", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "Lester says he swam to a nearby yacht seeking help, later left on a rescue boat for Ti Kaye, waited for an ambulance that did not arrive during his wait, and travelled on a different boat to Soufrière hospital. He lists himself, Nyal, Wabi, Mango and Mavado in the later male group and says that rescue group contained no Ocean Angel passengers.", "status": "witness account of own evacuation", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S028 (00:29:13), D2P3-S029 (00:29:37), D2P3-S030 (00:30:18), D2P3-S031 (00:30:52), D2P3-S033 (00:31:55), D2P3-S034 (00:32:29), D2P3-S035 (00:32:55), D2P3-S036 (00:33:25), D2P3-S037 (00:33:44), D2P3-S038 (00:34:20), D2P3-S039 (00:34:50)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S037", "caveat": "Do not collapse the two rescue boats into one. A single witness's experience of ambulance non-arrival does not establish why, whether dispatched, or system-wide failure. He did not know what happened to Taylor until later.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Yeah. >> And took you all to Suare. >> To the Sufra hospital. >> Yes. Yes. And who were who were the persons there with you at that point on that rescue board that took you all to to the hospital? Do you remember who the persons were? They had me, they had NY, they had Wabi, they had Mango, they had and they had Mado. >> Okay. >> Yes. >> It was only only men. >> Only men. Yeah. At that time. Yeah. Yes. So where were the ladies? As far as you", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F10", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "00:33:44", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S037", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S028", "D2P3-S029", "D2P3-S030", "D2P3-S031", "D2P3-S033", "D2P3-S034", "D2P3-S035", "D2P3-S036", "D2P3-S037", "D2P3-S038", "D2P3-S039" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C11", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "He describes the return as dark, not raining and a little choppy on the surface rather than large rolling seas. He estimates 1,500 RPM and calls the speed normal/easy.", "status": "witness impressions and uninstrumented estimate", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S085 (01:01:46), D2P3-S086 (01:02:24), D2P3-S087 (01:03:06)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S087", "caveat": "RPM is engine rotation, not boat speed. It must not be presented as 1,500 knots, a measured speed, or proof of compliance with safe-speed rules. No precise visibility distance is established.", "exact_excerpt": ">> I could say 1,500 RPM. >> 1,00 >> 500 RPM. Yeah. Normal speed. Take it easy. Take it light. >> Okay. The night in question before the accident. Where were you seated on the vessel? >> At the back. In front of the captain. >> In front of the captain. >> Yeah. >> And how many persons were in front of you?", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F12", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:03:06", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S087", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S085", "D2P3-S086", "D2P3-S087" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C12", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "He recalls no flare or siren immediately after impact and says he had no cellphone. At Ti Kaye he saw another person with a phone but did not know whom that person called.", "status": "negative observation and explicit uncertainty", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S090 (01:05:02), D2P3-S091 (01:05:38), D2P3-S092 (01:06:09)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S091", "caveat": "Say he did not observe signals; do not claim no one anywhere sent a distress message. Do not invent the call recipient or exact notification time.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Any nothing at all? Nothing. >> And And what exactly was the captain doing at that time? >> Driving the boat. >> Driving the boat immediately after the impact. >> No, no, no. The captain I thought was saying why we was going down. We was driving the boat. >> Okay. But after the impact, the captains jump in the sea to help all those people. >> Okay. >> Yeah.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F13", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:05:38", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S091", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S090", "D2P3-S091", "D2P3-S092" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C13", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "Lester repeatedly says local leisure trips he attended lacked safety briefings while tourist trips received them. When asked how he could know about tourists after earlier saying he travelled only with locals, he clarifies that only-locals referred to party trips and describes other tourism work/trips.", "status": "experience-based allegation narrowed through questioning", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S008 (00:11:53), D2P3-S012 (00:16:08), D2P3-S013 (00:17:02), D2P3-S014 (00:18:06), D2P3-S074 (00:54:57), D2P3-S075 (00:55:32), D2P3-S076 (00:56:13), D2P3-S093 (01:06:46), D2P3-S094 (01:07:21), D2P3-S095 (01:07:52), D2P3-S096 (01:08:16), D2P3-S097 (01:08:51), D2P3-S101 (01:11:30), D2P3-S102 (01:12:00)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S096", "caveat": "This is testimony about his experience, not a representative industry survey. His suggestion about tourists paying more is an asserted explanation, not established motive. Do not publish a racial or industry-wide conclusion as fact.", "exact_excerpt": ">> yes. >> For all of these trips that you can count, it has been locals. >> Mostly when we go party. Oh, mostly when you go parties. >> Yeah, party. >> But tourist is more I know since no tourist trip is afternoon. >> So how how how often have you been on boating trips with tourists? >> That mean a long time. >> How often? How many times a day a year or I could say in a year maybe like sometimes not too much maybe like 20", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F14", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:08:16", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S096", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S008", "D2P3-S012", "D2P3-S013", "D2P3-S014", "D2P3-S074", "D2P3-S075", "D2P3-S076", "D2P3-S093", "D2P3-S094", "D2P3-S095", "D2P3-S096", "D2P3-S097", "D2P3-S101", "D2P3-S102" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C14", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "He says he lacks a captain's licence and SLASPA training, knows red/green lights but not the navigation rules, and reports no personal contact or interception by SLASPA, marine police, Soufrière police or SMMA rangers during the operations he described.", "status": "self-report of competence and enforcement encounters", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S044 (00:38:10), D2P3-S045 (00:38:37), D2P3-S046 (00:39:13), D2P3-S081 (00:59:09), D2P3-S082 (00:59:47), D2P3-S099 (01:09:49), D2P3-S100 (01:10:31), D2P3-S101 (01:11:30), D2P3-S103 (01:12:40), D2P3-S104 (01:13:21), D2P3-S110 (01:17:17), D2P3-S111 (01:17:42), D2P3-S112 (01:18:12)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S111", "caveat": "Lack of an encounter known to this witness is not proof those bodies carried out no enforcement. Determine which entity had which duty for that vessel class and period. Do not give a legal conclusion without checking applicable law.", "exact_excerpt": ">> Just two questions. I heard you said to the chair that you were never in contact with Slasper any means of communication where your license or otherwise is concerned. That's correct. >> Yes sir. >> Neither the marine police unit. >> Yes sir. >> The suare police >> of license. >> Have the su police ever warned you or cautioned you about operating a vessel? >> No sir. >> Never did.", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F16", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:17:42", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S111", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S044", "D2P3-S045", "D2P3-S046", "D2P3-S081", "D2P3-S082", "D2P3-S099", "D2P3-S100", "D2P3-S101", "D2P3-S103", "D2P3-S104", "D2P3-S110", "D2P3-S111", "D2P3-S112" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C15", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Lester (surname unverified)", "statement": "An intervention corrects an examiner who labels the person at the bow the lookout. Later, Lester denies having said Mavado was the lookout and says only that he normally sat at the front; he does not know whether anyone appointed him.", "status": "role clarification and uncertainty", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S052 (00:42:33), D2P3-S053 (00:43:00), D2P3-S105 (01:13:52), D2P3-S106 (01:14:30), D2P3-S107 (01:15:24)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S106", "caveat": "Do not place a definitive LOOKOUT badge on Mavado in diagrams. Several passengers looking forward does not establish a formal lookout arrangement or compliance.", "exact_excerpt": ">> No. >> Understand? I thought I heard you say that. So, as far as you're aware, there was no lookout on the boat. Please move out the seat in the front of that Wrong bow. They just have a little bit of stick, fin stick. That is where he just sit on that. >> Who sits there? Sorry. >> Mad. >> Okay. >> Yeah, that's his number one sit. I don't", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F17", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:14:30", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S106", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S052", "D2P3-S053", "D2P3-S105", "D2P3-S106", "D2P3-S107" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } }, { "id": "D2P3-C16", "day": 2, "date": "2026-10-14", "part": "III", "speaker": "Chair", "statement": "The chair closes public sittings for that week and provisionally adjourns to Wednesday 21 October at 10 a.m., subject to confirmation with the Parliament office; witnesses may be recalled.", "status": "procedural announcement", "source": "Day 2, Part III · D2P3-S118 (01:22:21), D2P3-S119 (01:23:01), D2P3-S120 (01:23:47)", "source_anchor": "D2P3-S119", "caveat": "A current site should say this was the provisional date announced at the close of Day 2 and verify later scheduling before treating it as current. Coverage of two days is not a final inquiry report.", "exact_excerpt": "ought not to be surprised. >> Yes sir. >> Thank you very much for your evidence. You may step down. >> Okay sir. Okay. to this brings an end to our our public our sittings public sittings for for this week. Um unfortunately the one of our members will be off Ireland Thursday from Thursday tomorrow until Monday. So the earliest date that would would normally have been available is Tuesday. However, there's likely to be a sitting of parliament on Tuesday. So, uh, more", "epistemic_status": "attributed_record_not_commission_finding", "original": { "analysis_item": "P3-F19", "source_part": 3, "source_day": 2, "recording_timestamp": "01:23:01", "excerpt_segment_id": "D2P3-S119", "reading_block_ids": [ "D2P3-S118", "D2P3-S119", "D2P3-S120" ], "source_note": "Exact excerpt is one raw automated-source paragraph; supporting passages link the full account and its qualifications. Recording offsets are not clock times." } } ], "published": true }