[{"topic_id": "T01", "topic": "Source authority, reception and transition", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-917A", "CC-920", "CC-944", "CC-974A", "CC-1127A", "CC-2203"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C01", "C02", "C03"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E01", "E15"], "statute_ids": ["ST01", "ST02", "ST03"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill 4-20,32 and Schedule 1; Contract Model 1-4,39", "established_connections": "C01 confirms statutory as well as common-law reception through 917A. C03 is the reversed historical approach. ST01 supplies authentication evidence; ST03 supplies ordinary repeal savings.", "inference_or_unresolved": "C01 does not establish every English candidate’s reception or resolve every accrued-right question. The separate temporal construction of 920(2),944,974A and 1127A is not assumed identical to 917A.", "first_package_policy": "reform", "treatment_rationale": "Change future updating authority explicitly while preserving only the law actually applicable and its historical operation; the register records law rather than enacts it.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T02", "topic": "Capacity, cause, gratuitous commitments and third-person rights", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-1", "CC-917A", "CC-918", "CC-919", "CC-920", "CC-921", "CC-922", "CC-923", "CC-924", "CC-944", "CC-961", "CC-962", "CC-963", "CC-964"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C09", "C11", "C25"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E07"], "statute_ids": ["ST18"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill 13, Schedule 1.1-1.3; Contract Model 2-4,39", "established_connections": "C09 andC11 concern enforceable gratuitous cause; C25 connects onerous/gratuitous cause to land-registration classification.920(2) and 944 contain distinct English-law references.962 supplies local third-person rights.", "inference_or_unresolved": "E07 is an unconfirmed candidate with an express local-reservation issue. The selected cases do not settle disability-related capacity reform. ST18 is linked for property consequences inC25, not as a general capacity statute.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve cause and third-person rights; reform the future source authority in 920(2) and 944. Leave a substantive capacity/equality revision for explicit separate work.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T03", "topic": "Consent, fraud, misrepresentation and unfair terms", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-925", "CC-926", "CC-927", "CC-928", "CC-929", "CC-934", "CC-943", "CC-944", "CC-974A"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C06"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E05", "E06", "E16"], "statute_ids": ["ST05"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill Schedule 1.3-1.4; Contract Model 4(4),37", "established_connections": "The Code supplies error/fraud/lesion protections. C06 addresses unjust enrichment and actual wrongdoing while leaving unnecessary presumed-fraud/undue-influence issues undecided. ST05 establishes domestic consumer-term controls.", "inference_or_unresolved": "Reception ofE05 andE06 is unconfirmed in the reviewed cases. E16 is dependency evidence concerning a foreign amendment chain, not a domestic reception finding. No inference of a complete new consent code follows.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Keep existing validity and mandatory consumer protections while replacing selected source references; do not import foreign misrepresentation legislation merely because it is useful.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T04", "topic": "Performance, specific relief and work by another person", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-954", "CC-956", "CC-995", "CC-996", "CC-997", "CC-998"], "additional_code_references": "1387-1388;1583-1597 (additional Code references identified inC10,C15 andIF-005)", "case_ids": ["C10", "C11", "C15"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E08"], "statute_ids": ["ST06", "ST07", "ST19"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 2(3),4,7,18-20,25,32; Schedule 1A.1", "established_connections": "C10 applies existing 997 and special sale/earnest provisions; C11 grants performance in its own factual and statutory setting. C15 applies building and damages rules. ST19 limits relief against the Crown.", "inference_or_unresolved": "E08 remains a candidate, not an established general Saint Lucian services code. General performance remedies must be tested against the special contract and public-defendant rules.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve domestic performance-remedy foundations while supplying explicit conditions and substitute-work routes for covered contracts, with special-law priority.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T05", "topic": "Honesty, cooperation and contractual discretion", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-945", "CC-950", "CC-956", "CC-1015"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C13", "C14"], "english_candidate_ids": [], "statute_ids": ["ST13"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 4,6,11; Schedule 1B.3", "established_connections": "C13 andC14 concern contractual discretion and implied terms in employment-related settings.956 supplies incidents of contract;1015 addresses prevention of a condition. ST13 establishes mandatory employment priority.", "inference_or_unresolved": "These decisions do not by themselves establish every general honesty or cooperation duty proposed in section 6. The broader statutory formulation is an express policy choice, not a claim of universal existing doctrine.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Retain 956 and the anti-prevention principle while expressly supplementing performance with the proposed duties; preserve employment-specific protections.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T06", "topic": "Default, notices, cure and additional time", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-999", "CC-1000", "CC-1001", "CC-1093", "CC-1094", "CC-1095", "CC-1096", "CC-1099"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C08", "C15"], "english_candidate_ids": [], "statute_ids": ["ST10", "ST11", "ST12", "ST21"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 4,12-17,31(1); Schedule 1A.2-A.3", "established_connections": "C08 recognises default by suit under 999/1001. C15 uses existing default and building rules. ST10 contains special credit notice/cure requirements; ST11 identifies commenced electronic-transaction provisions.", "inference_or_unresolved": "ST12 flags enacted electronic provisions whose commencement was not established in the bounded search. ST21 records procedural amendments; it is not evidence of substantive 917A repeal. Generic notices cannot replace special statutory periods.", "first_package_policy": "reform", "treatment_rationale": "Deliberately redesign default and cure for covered obligations, while preserving statutory credit safeguards and distinguishing private notices from service of proceedings.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T07", "topic": "Anticipatory breach, termination and restoration", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-954", "CC-997", "CC-1019", "CC-1069"], "additional_code_references": "957;1382 (additional context inC17)", "case_ids": ["C16", "C17"], "english_candidate_ids": [], "statute_ids": ["ST07", "ST14", "ST18"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 4,17,21-24,32,39; Schedule 1A.1", "established_connections": "C16 andC17 address anticipatory breach, termination and contractual/land-law interfaces. ST07 contains existing consumer remedies; ST14 constrains termination and acceleration in specified insolvency situations.", "inference_or_unresolved": "The proposed Part 4 procedure and restoration scheme are not simply a transcription of those decisions. Property reversal and creditor priority require their own legal basis; ST18 governs land effects.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Provide a defined prospective termination process and coordinated restoration while preserving consumer, land and collective-insolvency limits.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T08", "topic": "Damages, causation, foreseeability and mitigation", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-996", "CC-998", "CC-1001", "CC-1002", "CC-1003", "CC-1004", "CC-1005", "CC-1006"], "additional_code_references": "1584;1590 (building context inC15)", "case_ids": ["C15"], "english_candidate_ids": [], "statute_ids": ["ST07", "ST19"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 18,25-29,32-37; Schedule 1A.3", "established_connections": "C15 applies Code damages/default/foreseeability provisions and repair-cost mitigation in a building dispute. ST07 supplies specific consumer remedial rights; ST19 supplies a public-defendant boundary.", "inference_or_unresolved": "C15 is a first-instance judgment and is not proof that every proposed causation, lost-chance or resource-sensitive mitigation formulation is already settled law. Crown restrictions matter only when the defendant and claim engage them.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve compensatory foundations while making assessment and mitigation explicit; identify substantive additions and keep specialised remedies and proof requirements intact.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T09", "topic": "Agreed payments, penal clauses and disproportionate sums", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-1007", "CC-1062", "CC-1063", "CC-1064", "CC-1065", "CC-1066", "CC-1067", "CC-1068"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": [], "english_candidate_ids": [], "statute_ids": ["ST05"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 5(2)(c),13,30,32; Schedule 1A.3-A.4", "established_connections": "Published 1007 and 1066 already permit reduction for partial performance or wholly disproportionate injury. ST05 independently controls unfair consumer terms and exclusions.", "inference_or_unresolved": "No directly relevant penalty merits case is identified in the selected case inventory. The proposed factors, default coordination, reasons and non-exclusion rule are legislative choices whose local consequences require review.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve existing judicial reduction, consolidate overlapping rules and disclose new safeguards; keep allocation under 1067/1068 subject to the enforceable amount.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "No directly relevant case identified in the selected 25-case inventory; this is not a finding that no such case exists."}, {"topic_id": "T10", "topic": "Interest, late payment and monetary performance", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-1008", "CC-1009", "CC-1009A", "CC-1070", "CC-1083", "CC-1084"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": [], "english_candidate_ids": ["E10"], "statute_ids": ["ST17", "ST19"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 8,13(5),31; Schedule 1B.1", "established_connections": "The Code supplies interest rules and exceptions. ST17 includes award interest; ST19 includes public-defendant interest and satisfaction rules. The module expressly preserves 1008-1009A.", "inference_or_unresolved": "E10 is an unconfirmed reception candidate with important express-local-conflict questions. No general late-payment rate is inferred from its existence, and the selected case inventory does not establish one.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Keep existing interest substance and rates while changing the default trigger for covered obligations; avoid duplicate compensation and unauthorised compounding.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "No directly relevant case identified in the selected 25-case inventory; this is not a finding that no such case exists."}, {"topic_id": "T11", "topic": "Impediments, frustration and hardship", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-1002", "CC-1003", "CC-1130", "CC-1131", "CC-1132", "CC-1132A", "CC-1132B"], "additional_code_references": "Commercial Code 278;1583-1586; Land Acquisition Act context inC12", "case_ids": ["C12"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E04"], "statute_ids": ["ST18", "ST22"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 4,33-36; Schedule 1A.5,B.2", "established_connections": "C12 distinguishes increased difficulty from later compulsory acquisition that frustrated completion.1132A/B already contain a domestic financial-adjustment scheme and exclusions. Construction loss rules and property effects remain material.", "inference_or_unresolved": "E04 is a candidate/analogue, not a confirmed finding that the whole English 1943 Act applies independently. C12 does not decide every hurricane, labour-only construction or insurance scenario. ST22 is a sectoral boundary, not a general frustration code.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Restate the general discharge test while retaining financial adjustments and indemnity rights; do not introduce judicial price rewriting merely through a hardship request.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T12", "topic": "Quasi-contract, mistaken payments and unjust enrichment", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-973", "CC-974", "CC-974A", "CC-975", "CC-976", "CC-977", "CC-978", "CC-979", "CC-980", "CC-981", "CC-982", "CC-983", "CC-984", "CC-1071"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C06"], "english_candidate_ids": [], "statute_ids": ["ST14", "ST15"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill Schedule 1.4,6-9,16-20; Contract Model 24(6),35", "established_connections": "C06 confirms the English-law direction for the unjust-enrichment issue considered. The Code independently regulates management of affairs and undue receipts. ST14/ST15 matter where recovery meets collective insolvency or set-off.", "inference_or_unresolved": "C06 does not establish every possible 974A action. The contract module’s restitution provision does not replace the complete quasi-contract chapter or confer creditor priority.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Reform source authority under 974A while retaining existing restitution actions; separate breach-based restoration, frustrated-contract adjustment and general unjust enrichment.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T13", "topic": "Set-off and reciprocal debts", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-1117", "CC-1118", "CC-1120", "CC-1121", "CC-1122", "CC-1124", "CC-1126", "CC-1127", "CC-1127A"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C07"], "english_candidate_ids": [], "statute_ids": ["ST15"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill Schedule 1.5,5-10; Contract Model 4(4),24(6)", "established_connections": "The Code supplies local set-off rules and 1127A adds an English-law connection. ST15 expressly identifies insolvency set-off/compensation and overriding fraud/preference constraints.", "inference_or_unresolved": "C07 is included only for the insolvency/creditor-ranking field boundary; it is not an identified merits holding construing 1127A. No such set-off merits case is identified in the selected inventory.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Replace the future foreign-source connection while preserving established set-off cases, third-person protection and overriding insolvency rules.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T14", "topic": "Defamation, serious harm, defences and local privilege", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-917A", "CC-989F", "CC-989G", "CC-989H", "CC-989I", "CC-989J", "CC-989K", "CC-989L", "CC-989M", "CC-989N", "CC-989O", "CC-989P", "CC-989Q", "CC-989R", "CC-989S"], "additional_code_references": "2123;989N Schedule", "case_ids": ["C01", "C02", "C03", "C23", "C24"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E01"], "statute_ids": ["ST20"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill 6-14,16-20; Contract Model 2,4(6) (scope exclusion)", "established_connections": "C01 establishes reception of the provisions considered. C23 is a procedural pleading application; C24 is a first-instance merits application. C03’s common-law-only approach was reversed. Local privilege and prescription provisions remain relevant.", "inference_or_unresolved": "This does not establish that every part ofE01 or every later amendment applies unchanged. ST20 is the evidence interface, not a defamation reception finding. The contract module does not rewrite tort law.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve the operative composite defamation law while ending automatic future updates through 917A; defer substantive defamation and equality reform to a dedicated module.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T15", "topic": "Negligence and responsibility for persons or things", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-985", "CC-986", "CC-987", "CC-989D", "CC-1137"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C20", "C21", "C22"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E12", "E13"], "statute_ids": ["ST20"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill 5-14; Contract Model 4(6),28(4) (separate contractual scope)", "established_connections": "C20 applies negligence with 985/986 and distinguishes the roles of a thing and human conduct. C21/C22 apply local negligence and fault rules. E12 is an analogue of positively used 989D.", "inference_or_unresolved": "E13 remains a historical/foreign-forum lead with local primary reception unverified in this audit. It must not be converted into a finding that the Occupiers Liability Act applies. Broader revision of 986 remains separate.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve established domestic tort protections while changing source authority; keep candidate statutes, local fault rules and evidential questions distinct.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T16", "topic": "Death, estate damages and dependants’ claims", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-917A", "CC-985", "CC-988", "CC-989D"], "additional_code_references": "609", "case_ids": ["C04", "C05", "C21", "C22"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E02", "E03"], "statute_ids": [], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill 6-10,16-20; Contract Model 2,4(6) (scope exclusion)", "established_connections": "C04 holds that the English lost-years change conflicted with 609;C05 was overruled on that issue. C21 applies the preserved local position subject to proof.988 separately governs specified dependant claims.", "inference_or_unresolved": "E02 is excluded for the conflict identified, not generally declared irrelevant to every subject. E03 is an analogue; it is not necessary to pretend the local 609 rule derives solely from current English statute.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Retain the established local priority and distinct claim structures while reforming the future update mechanism; do not merge estate and dependant loss into one entitlement.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T17", "topic": "Contributory fault and contribution between liable persons", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-989C", "CC-989D", "CC-989E", "CC-1034", "CC-1036", "CC-1037", "CC-1048", "CC-1049"], "additional_code_references": "", "case_ids": ["C21", "C22"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E11", "E12"], "statute_ids": [], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill 6-10; Contract Model 4(4),(6),28(4),32", "established_connections": "C21/C22 use local fault/death provisions.989C governs tortfeasor contribution;989D governs contributory negligence;1036-1037 address local joint-and-several rules. E12 is an analogue of the local rule used.", "inference_or_unresolved": "E11 reception is unconfirmed in the reviewed cases. The cases do not prove automatic receipt of the English 1978 Act or identity between contractual mitigation, contributory negligence and co-debtor contribution.", "first_package_policy": "mixed", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve local allocation rules and avoid double reduction or recovery; any extension of contribution beyond existing fields requires express justification.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T18", "topic": "Property, security and insolvency constraints on remedies", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-957", "CC-958", "CC-959", "CC-960", "CC-971", "CC-972", "CC-1023", "CC-1085", "CC-1086", "CC-1087", "CC-1088", "CC-1107", "CC-1108", "CC-1109", "CC-1110"], "additional_code_references": "1382;1387-1388;1908;1942 (case-linked additional references)", "case_ids": ["C07", "C08", "C10", "C17", "C25"], "english_candidate_ids": [], "statute_ids": ["ST14", "ST15", "ST16", "ST18"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill 5,10; Contract Model 4,23(4),24(6),39", "established_connections": "C07 preserves the insolvency field boundary; C08 distinguishes the personal obligation from security; C10/C17/C25 connect contracts to land effects. ST14-ST16 andST18 establish current specific priorities and constraints.", "inference_or_unresolved": "Older judgments must not be treated as statements of every post-2024 insolvency or post-2025 security rule. ST15 records the Commercial Code insolvency-title repeal; destination-law reconciliation remains necessary.", "first_package_policy": "retain", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve special statutory priority and property formalities; general termination or restitution should not silently alter security ranking, surety discharge or insolvency stays.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}, {"topic_id": "T19", "topic": "Product liability, consumer quality and repair remedies", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-985", "CC-986", "CC-987", "CC-995", "CC-997", "CC-1007"], "additional_code_references": "1432 and following (sale-warranty interface)", "case_ids": [], "english_candidate_ids": ["E06", "E08", "E09"], "statute_ids": ["ST04", "ST05", "ST06", "ST07", "ST09"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Contract Model 4,7,10,15,30,37; Reception Bill 5,10", "established_connections": "ST09 identifies domestic defective-product liability and restrictions on exclusions. ST06/ST07 identify existing quality, repair and consumer-remedy provisions. The contract module expressly preserves those protections.", "inference_or_unresolved": "No product-liability merits case is identified in the selected case inventory. E06/E08/E09 remain candidates and cannot be used to bypass the local statute’s definitions, scope, exceptions or commencement.", "first_package_policy": "retain", "treatment_rationale": "Keep domestic product and consumer protections controlling; distinguish a contractual service remedy from a statutory product-liability claim.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "No directly relevant case identified in the selected 25-case inventory; this is not a finding that no such case exists."}, {"topic_id": "T20", "topic": "Prescription, proof and trust boundaries", "code_article_row_ids": ["CC-916A", "CC-1069", "CC-1133", "CC-1134", "CC-1135", "CC-1136", "CC-1137"], "additional_code_references": "603(3);2103/2103A;2111;2121-2123;2129", "case_ids": ["C08", "C18", "C19"], "english_candidate_ids": ["E15"], "statute_ids": ["ST11", "ST12", "ST17", "ST20"], "proposed_bill_clauses": "Reception Bill 5(4),15-20; Contract Model 4,12,38-39", "established_connections": "C18/C19 distinguish a conspiracy-to-breach-trust delict from breach of trust itself, affecting prescription. C08 identifies local prescription/default issues.1137 is an independent evidence gap-filler;916A remains outside the selected freeze.", "inference_or_unresolved": "E15 is not presumed received over local prescription. ST12 flags commencement uncertainty. Digital form, proof, substantive validity and interruption of time are separate questions; a notice does not automatically preserve a claim.", "first_package_policy": "retain", "treatment_rationale": "Preserve independent trust/evidence sources and local time rules in this package; state the remaining dependencies and avoid a false claim that all English-law reception has ended.", "coverage_date": "2026-09-05", "join_status": "Analytical topic join of existing records; underlying authority and reception statuses are preserved.", "case_coverage_note": "See the stated case holding and court level; topic relevance does not expand the holding."}]