Skip to the investigation
Anse Cochon inquiryEvidence through 28 October morning · 2026
Anse Cochon inquiryEvidence explorerExplore
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE · THROUGH 28 OCTOBER 2026

What was said, and what it establishes

A source-linked evidence register across five supplied dates. Follow each account back to its source, compare what later witnesses add, and keep observation separate from inference. The two 23 October sessions and the 28 October morning extract now sit alongside the earlier record.

— new entries · 23 PM / 28 October5 supplied dates10 transcript files
How to read and use the register

The main text of each entry is an analytical paraphrase. Expand its source excerpt to read the supplied wording, then open context to see the surrounding passage. Day 1 Part I, all Day 2 parts and the later supplied files contain recording offsets. Day 1 Parts II and III use editorial IDs, not timecodes.

Entries are shown with the latest sitting first. The 187 Day 1 entries retain their historical wording; dated follow-up notes point to new evidence instead of silently rewriting testimony. A new witness can corroborate a narrow detail without establishing its wider interpretation.

Person filters identify voices named in the analysis; some entries contain several people. Topic tags are keyword-assisted navigation and may overlap. Proper names and speaker attribution remain provisional where noted. Raw-source quotations retain automated spelling, even where a separate reading edition has a documented correction.

The supplied record extends to 28 October morning. Human transcript editing and audio verification are still pending for the later sources. The 21 and 28 October extracts end at announced recesses. English summaries of poorly transcribed Kwéyòl are identified as commissioners’ summaries. Family testimony about notification and support is not collision eyewitness evidence.

Export all matching entries

Loading the source record…

A record that can be checked. Read the source passages, compare accounts and distinguish evidence from analysis.

Sources, method & corrections →