Working surface · 32 decision records

Search, shortlist and compare the choices.

Start with the issue or outcome you care about. Every result keeps the recommendation, first proposed move, delivery record and full evidence link together.

Policy area
Evidence view

These filters describe what each brief publishes. They do not rank policy merit, readiness or evidence quality.

Comparison traySelect 2–3 proposals

Use “Add to comparison” on any proposal. No score will be created.

Showing 6 of 32 matching proposals · 32 total

Research 46Cross-cutting

New policy proposal · 23 September 2026

Transport, time and productivity

North–Castries Journey Reliability Pilot

Recover time through coordinated operating changes while protecting safety, access and affordable travel.

First proposed move · Days 1–21

Name the delivery lead and publish an affordable spending cap after costing.

Mechanisms
4
Delivery phases
3
Measures
5
Cited sources
9
Inspect the proposed mechanisms
  1. 01
    One measured corridor

    Select by passenger delay and bottleneck evidence. Include side roads and both peak directions.

  2. 02
    A dependable minibus service

    Agree permissions, departures, boarding space, rider information and transparent operator compensation.

  3. 03
    Roadside space that works

    Coordinate deliveries, school loading, safe walking routes and essential access.

  4. 04
    A shared roadworks calendar

    Join utility and road plans; preserve emergency access and publish justified closure windows.

Research 37Cross-cutting

Updated 12 October 2026

Water service & household protection

Water Service and Household Protection Programme

Pair measurable service duties and accessible remedies with funded household protection and the operating capacity to deliver safe, dependable water.

First proposed move · Days 1–30

Publish the tariff guide, incident log and service-agreement status.

Mechanisms
5
Delivery phases
4
Measures
5
Cited sources
4
Inspect the proposed mechanisms
  1. 01
    Publish the service record

    Define supply-zone boundaries, validate instruments and report interruptions, pressure, water quality, repairs and emergency access through a lawful public summary.

  2. 02
    Fund practical delivery

    Assign staff, essential spares, bounded repairs, verification and six critical-site backup allowances for a twelve-month programme.

  3. 03
    Reach households through their actual arrangements

    Calibrate assistance to local resources and interruption burdens, including tenants, shared accounts and people without a direct utility account. Fund eligible credits and an accessible appeal route.

  4. 04
    Act on a dated readiness review

    Publish the review by 15 December 2026, identify unfinished commitments and initiate reasoned corrective action or any justified formal tariff proceeding.

  5. 05
    Protect the next year’s service

    Reconcile restricted capital funds, operating receipts and recurrent commitments. Expand only after independently checked results and an affordable continuing budget.

Research 36Cross-cutting

Updated 15 October 2026

Maritime safety, law & public policy

Maritime safety and capability programme

Make every duty deliverable and every major transition reviewable.

First proposed move · First 90 days

Reconcile laws and treaty obligations

Mechanisms
4
Delivery phases
3
Measures
3
Cited sources
3
Inspect the proposed mechanisms
  1. 01
    A safe departure

    Connect vessel condition, capacity, crew, weather, communications and return arrangements to the actual voyage.

  2. 02
    Independent learning

    Protect investigation from interference, preserve evidence and publish recommendations with visible follow-through.

  3. 03
    Protection that can pay

    Preserve treaty regimes and test domestic insurance, pollution and wreck arrangements against real terms and costs.

  4. 04
    Ready institutions

    Assign lawful responsibilities, staff, recurrent finance, public guidance and appeal routes before new requirements commence.

Research 35Capable state & public trust

Updated 6 September 2026

Law, sovereignty & state capability

Article 917A Replacement Package

Saint Lucia should import information before it imports legal effect: monitor useful foreign developments continuously, then make their domestic authority visible, reviewable and Saint Lucian.

First proposed move · Before introduction

Publish an official plain-language note on Article 917A and the current governing legal position.

Mechanisms
6
Delivery phases
4
Measures
6
Cited sources
14
Inspect the proposed mechanisms
  1. 01
    Preserve the operative baseline

    Preserve every rule actually applicable through the specified routes at the cut-off, whether or not it was already identified or litigated. State the transition for existing legal relations.

  2. 02
    Monitor with machines, verify with lawyers

    Use automated feeds to detect changes, trace dependencies and draft comparisons. Require named legal reviewers to verify the source, scope, version and uncertainty.

  3. 03
    Require domestic legislation for substantive updates

    Under the proposed process, substantive changes require primary legislation. Administrative regulations cannot activate new private-law rules. Lawful domestic judicial development remains.

  4. 04
    Treat judgments as comparative authority

    Index later English cases for research, let Saint Lucian courts weigh their reasoning in actual disputes, and reserve legislation for major policy choices.

  5. 05
    Keep the register informational

    Publish sources, versions, reception evidence and uncertainty. Registration cannot create a right, and omission cannot erase an otherwise valid rule.

  6. 06
    Build permanent mixed-system capability

    Create a small Saint Lucian law-reform unit with OECS-shared monitoring and comparative research, while keeping domestic authorization local and sustaining modular Civil Code modernization.

Research 34Capable state & public trust

Updated 14 September 2026

Migration, rights & state capacity

Eight operating-design variables

The legal and fiscal exposure changes with the design of eight linked fields. The public record currently answers parts of some fields and leaves others open.

First proposed move · Before a completed transfer can be verified

Authoritative event status: proposed, scheduled, departed, arrived, admitted or still unverified.

Mechanisms
8
Delivery phases
3
Measures
14
Cited sources
65
Inspect the proposed mechanisms
  1. 01
    Instrument and side terms

    Public status: the MOU is reported signed and non-binding. The text, annexes, financial schedule, redactions and side letters are not public.

  2. 02
    Individual case decision

    Public status: Saint Lucia reportedly may accept all, some or none of a U.S. list. The rule for an incomplete file, extension or request for more information is unknown.

  3. 03
    Protection review

    Legal baseline: CAT article 3 applies. The screen, counsel, interpretation, reasons, UNHCR referral and review with suspensive effect have not been published.

  4. 04
    Reception and liberty

    Public status: the minister said people will not be treated as prisoners. Accommodation, conditions, case management and any custody exception remain unpublished.

  5. 05
    Lifecycle funding

    The relevant cost includes the full number of case-months, not only reception. Direct funding, IOM services, flights, audit, contingency and residual cases are separate fields.

  6. 06
    Service capacity

    The announced flow is small, but one complex case can use immigration, health, court, legal, police, housing and interpreter capacity for months.

  7. 07
    Independent visibility

    The public record does not identify an independent monitor, private-access rule, complaint channel or schedule for case totals, costs, incidents and delays.

  8. 08
    Pause, termination and tail

    The MOU is reported terminable, but notice, pause triggers, renewal, take-back and responsibility for people still present at closure are not public.

Research 33Capable state & public trust

Updated 16 September 2026

Justice infrastructure · public finance · Castries

Halls of Justice Public Value and Readiness Account

Make the project auditable from financial close through transfer, and make lease commencement depend on a safe, accessible and operationally ready justice service rather than the appearance of a finished building.

First proposed move · Within 30 days

Publish the signed BOLT, land lease and revised-site amendment with a redaction schedule.

Mechanisms
8
Delivery phases
5
Measures
16
Cited sources
49
Inspect the proposed mechanisms
  1. 01
    Publish the contract account

    Release the BOLT and revised-site amendment with narrow redactions, plus quarterly payments, total and present-value cost, financing, fees, maintenance, risk allocation, deductions, termination and handback terms.

  2. 02
    Reconstruct the value-for-money decision

    Publish the procurement route, business case, public-sector comparator, affordability and fiscal-risk tests, evaluation or sole-capability justification, legal review milestone and approvals.

  3. 03
    Control the current design

    Issue one dated pack with approved sites, areas, rooms, floors, capacity, parking, accessibility, circulation, resilience criteria, consultants, approvals and completion baseline.

  4. 04
    Name the supply chain

    List every material consultant, subcontractor and supplier, contract scope and value, nationality, local labour and material share, training, safety record and payment performance.

  5. 05
    Build an intelligent public client

    Give NIPRO and Government an independent cost, contract, commissioning, facilities, fiscal, accessibility, court-operations and ICT team with change control and public reporting.

  6. 06
    Commission before paying

    Tie service commencement to independent integrated tests, operational simulations, statutory approvals, critical-defect closure, complete asset records and trained staff.

  7. 07
    Open the justice service

    Fund the case-management, registry, family, witness, legal-aid, interpretation, custody, security, digital, records, ICT and facilities operating model before migration.

  8. 08
    Measure outcomes and condition

    Publish quarterly case, access, user, technology, building, fiscal and local-value results; independently assure them annually and prepare the asset for EC$1 transfer.

New tool · proposal comparator

Compare the decision records, not a made-up score.

Place two or three SLPA proposals side by side. The comparison exposes proposed actions, named responsibility, public tests and evidence trails; it does not declare a winner.

Choose two or three proposals above.

The desk will assemble the first move, named responsibility, success measures and evidence trail for each selection.